Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Video Game News › Company of Heroes Goes DirectX 10
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Company of Heroes Goes DirectX 10

post #1 of 13
Thread Starter 
Quote:


At 1280x1024 all of the video cards were above 30FPS with the overclocked XFX GeForce 8800 Ultra XXX Edition video card leading the pack. The battle between the GeForce 8800 GTS 640MB and the ATI Radeon 2900XT was close with just 4.5 frame per second difference between the two cards. The just released Forceware 158.45 and CATALYST 7.5 drivers were both able to render everything correctly. Let's see what happens when we enable 8x AA.




With the resolution still set to 1280 x 1024 we enabled 8x AA on all the cards to see how they do with antialiasing on. In the options menu on NVIDIA G80 series graphics cards you get to pick between Coverage Sampled AA (CSAA) and Quality Antialiasing (QAA). CSAA produces antialiased images that rival the quality of 8x or 16x MSAA, while introducing only a minimal performance hit over standard (typically 4x) MSAA. It works by introducing the concept of a new sample type: a sample that represents coverage. This differs from previous AA techniques where coverage was always inherently tied to another sample type. Basically it allows developers to use fewer Color/Z/Stencil samples than standard MSAA, and as a result the game will run faster at the cost of some quality. We ran the CoH benchmark with the 8Q setting, not the 8x CSAA setting because the 8Q setting is equivalent to ATI’s 8x MSAA in terms of quality. It seems here that having 8x AA enabled on both series cards turned out to reduce performance by 10 FPS across the board.

Let's turn up the resolution...





At 1600 x 1200 we see both the GeForce 8800 GTS 640MB and the Radeon 2900XT drop below 30FPS with no AA enabled. It should be noted that testing was done on an AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600+ processor, which some might think limit the performance levels. On an Intel Core 2 Duo X6800 processor the GeForce 8800 GTS 640MB scored 32.6 FPS, which might imply that Company of Heroes could be shader bound and not CPU bound. This also could explain why the performance increases so much between each GeForce 8 series video card.




With 4x Antialiasing enabled at 1600 x 1200 all the cards take a performance hit, but just slightly. It was enough to make the game not playable on the GeoForce 8800 GTS and Radeon 2900 XT as both averaged in the mid 20's with the lows well into the low single digits

http://www.legitreviews.com/article/507/1/
Quote:
The Company of Heroes DirectX 10 patch is finally here! The ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT doesn't have enough muscle to beat out the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 640MB in Company of Heroes when using the latest drivers from both companies.
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
T5200 Intel 945 Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 950 2GB DDR2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD 160GB SATA Multiformat Double Layer DVD RW Windows Vista Home Premium 15.4" Ultra Bright WXGA TFT/WestingHouse 22" LCD 
KeyboardCaseMouse
Dynex Gateway Dynex 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
T5200 Intel 945 Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 950 2GB DDR2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD 160GB SATA Multiformat Double Layer DVD RW Windows Vista Home Premium 15.4" Ultra Bright WXGA TFT/WestingHouse 22" LCD 
KeyboardCaseMouse
Dynex Gateway Dynex 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2 of 13
Right, because a GTX that musters a paltry 32 FPS with a little eye candy is that much better. Gimme a break.

Yea the ATI cards suck, but nVidias offering is NOT that much better. Quite frankly anyone with a GTX, or an XT for that matter, should be concerned if their cards can run DX10 native games.
ElRigTheRig
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Q6600 G0 @ 2.4 GHz Asus Maximus Formula Asus EN8800GT 512MB 4GB G.Skill DDR2-1000 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
1.858TB (3x JBOD) HP 16x DVD Burner Vista Ultimate x64 SP2 24" FPD2485 Gateway LCD 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Razer Lycosa Ultra X3 1000w Antec P182 Logitech G5 
Mouse Pad
Razer Xact Mat 
  hide details  
Reply
ElRigTheRig
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Q6600 G0 @ 2.4 GHz Asus Maximus Formula Asus EN8800GT 512MB 4GB G.Skill DDR2-1000 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
1.858TB (3x JBOD) HP 16x DVD Burner Vista Ultimate x64 SP2 24" FPD2485 Gateway LCD 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Razer Lycosa Ultra X3 1000w Antec P182 Logitech G5 
Mouse Pad
Razer Xact Mat 
  hide details  
Reply
post #3 of 13
Rut-ro! Hrm... pondering if I shall wait longer to make the DX10 card switch..
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Q6600 @ 3.6GHz DFI Lanparty DK P35-T2RS XFX 7950GT 512mb G.SKILL 2x1gb DDR2 800 HZ's 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Seagate 2x320gb SATA, RAID 0 Plextor PX-755SA DVD-RW SATA XP SP3 Hanns-G HX-192RPB 19" LCD 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Ideazon Merc Tt Toughpower 700w Lian Li PC-V1000BPLUSII Razer Copperhead, Green 
Mouse Pad
WOWPAD 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Q6600 @ 3.6GHz DFI Lanparty DK P35-T2RS XFX 7950GT 512mb G.SKILL 2x1gb DDR2 800 HZ's 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Seagate 2x320gb SATA, RAID 0 Plextor PX-755SA DVD-RW SATA XP SP3 Hanns-G HX-192RPB 19" LCD 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Ideazon Merc Tt Toughpower 700w Lian Li PC-V1000BPLUSII Razer Copperhead, Green 
Mouse Pad
WOWPAD 
  hide details  
Reply
post #4 of 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElMikeTheMike View Post
Right, because a GTX that musters a paltry 32 FPS with a little eye candy is that much better. Gimme a break.

Yea the ATI cards suck, but nVidias offering is NOT that much better. Quite frankly anyone with a GTX, or an XT for that matter, should be concerned if their cards can run DX10 native games.
They should of tested the 8600 cards too. Probably like 10fps .
Magicbox
(17 items)
 
crapbox
(13 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
FX 8320 Sabertooth 990FX Nitro+ RX480 Kingston HyperX Fury 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Samsung 850 EVO  Kingston HyperX 3K Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 Noctua NH-D15 
OSOSMonitorKeyboard
Kubuntu  Windows 10 Pro Dell U2515H CM Quickfire TK (Cherry Blue) 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Cooler Master Silent Pro M 850W Enthoo Pro Logitech G502 Logitech G440 
Audio
Xonar DX 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Sempron 3300+ HP stock mobo (laptop) 200M (IGP) 2x1GB PC3200 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
100GB ATA133 DVD/CDRW Kubuntu 32 bit 14.1" (1280x768) 
Power
6 cell 
  hide details  
Reply
Magicbox
(17 items)
 
crapbox
(13 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
FX 8320 Sabertooth 990FX Nitro+ RX480 Kingston HyperX Fury 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Samsung 850 EVO  Kingston HyperX 3K Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 Noctua NH-D15 
OSOSMonitorKeyboard
Kubuntu  Windows 10 Pro Dell U2515H CM Quickfire TK (Cherry Blue) 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Cooler Master Silent Pro M 850W Enthoo Pro Logitech G502 Logitech G440 
Audio
Xonar DX 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Sempron 3300+ HP stock mobo (laptop) 200M (IGP) 2x1GB PC3200 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
100GB ATA133 DVD/CDRW Kubuntu 32 bit 14.1" (1280x768) 
Power
6 cell 
  hide details  
Reply
post #5 of 13
Oh man... I feel like the 8800GTS was really a good buy now. ^_^
Main
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i5 3570K ASRock Z77 Pro3 Galaxy 560Ti G.Skills DDR3 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
WD Cavier 250GB + SimpleTech 320GB EXHDD Windows 7 x64 Samsung 19" SyncMaster 940BW OCZ 600w GameXStream 
Case
COOLER MASTER Centurion 5 
  hide details  
Reply
Main
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i5 3570K ASRock Z77 Pro3 Galaxy 560Ti G.Skills DDR3 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
WD Cavier 250GB + SimpleTech 320GB EXHDD Windows 7 x64 Samsung 19" SyncMaster 940BW OCZ 600w GameXStream 
Case
COOLER MASTER Centurion 5 
  hide details  
Reply
post #6 of 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Melcar View Post
They should of tested the 8600 cards too. Probably like 10fps .
You're not kidding. The 8600 is a pathetic excuse for a DX10 card. I really dont see how anyone could recommend that card to anyone here. If you think its a cheap way to DX10...well, it is, but also a cheap way to horrendus frame rates. You're really getting what you pay for in the 8600's case.
ElRigTheRig
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Q6600 G0 @ 2.4 GHz Asus Maximus Formula Asus EN8800GT 512MB 4GB G.Skill DDR2-1000 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
1.858TB (3x JBOD) HP 16x DVD Burner Vista Ultimate x64 SP2 24" FPD2485 Gateway LCD 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Razer Lycosa Ultra X3 1000w Antec P182 Logitech G5 
Mouse Pad
Razer Xact Mat 
  hide details  
Reply
ElRigTheRig
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Q6600 G0 @ 2.4 GHz Asus Maximus Formula Asus EN8800GT 512MB 4GB G.Skill DDR2-1000 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
1.858TB (3x JBOD) HP 16x DVD Burner Vista Ultimate x64 SP2 24" FPD2485 Gateway LCD 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Razer Lycosa Ultra X3 1000w Antec P182 Logitech G5 
Mouse Pad
Razer Xact Mat 
  hide details  
Reply
post #7 of 13
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElMikeTheMike View Post
You're not kidding. The 8600 is a pathetic excuse for a DX10 card. I really dont see how anyone could recommend that card to anyone here. If you think its a cheap way to DX10...well, it is, but also a cheap way to horrendus frame rates. You're really getting what you pay for in the 8600's case.
Why the 8600?? the 2900 xt is targeted to 8800 gts
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
T5200 Intel 945 Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 950 2GB DDR2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD 160GB SATA Multiformat Double Layer DVD RW Windows Vista Home Premium 15.4" Ultra Bright WXGA TFT/WestingHouse 22" LCD 
KeyboardCaseMouse
Dynex Gateway Dynex 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
T5200 Intel 945 Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 950 2GB DDR2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD 160GB SATA Multiformat Double Layer DVD RW Windows Vista Home Premium 15.4" Ultra Bright WXGA TFT/WestingHouse 22" LCD 
KeyboardCaseMouse
Dynex Gateway Dynex 
  hide details  
Reply
post #8 of 13
These new DX10 cards don't seem up to what they are supposed to. Think I'ma stick to my AGP x1950pro for awhile til $200 DX10 card can play every DX10 game at decent frame rate at 1600x1200 here.
Of A Down Redux
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E4300 @ 3.0Ghz GIGABYTE GA-P35-DS3L VisionTek HD4850 Corsair XMS2 2GB DDR2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD320 + WD400 HP DVD burner Windows XP PRO Samsung 226BW 22" 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Generic Hp keyboard FSP 450W + TT 430W Antec 3000B MX518 
Mouse Pad
Staples' 
  hide details  
Reply
Of A Down Redux
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E4300 @ 3.0Ghz GIGABYTE GA-P35-DS3L VisionTek HD4850 Corsair XMS2 2GB DDR2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD320 + WD400 HP DVD burner Windows XP PRO Samsung 226BW 22" 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Generic Hp keyboard FSP 450W + TT 430W Antec 3000B MX518 
Mouse Pad
Staples' 
  hide details  
Reply
post #9 of 13
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by shajbot View Post
These new DX10 cards don't seem up to what they are supposed to. Think I'ma stick to my AGP x1950pro for awhile til $200 DX10 card can play every DX10 game at decent frame rate at 1600x1200 here.
Agreed. Not worth buying right now plus i heard by the time the DX10 games comes out,the top of the line GTX will become a Mid range card as far as performance
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
T5200 Intel 945 Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 950 2GB DDR2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD 160GB SATA Multiformat Double Layer DVD RW Windows Vista Home Premium 15.4" Ultra Bright WXGA TFT/WestingHouse 22" LCD 
KeyboardCaseMouse
Dynex Gateway Dynex 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
T5200 Intel 945 Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 950 2GB DDR2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD 160GB SATA Multiformat Double Layer DVD RW Windows Vista Home Premium 15.4" Ultra Bright WXGA TFT/WestingHouse 22" LCD 
KeyboardCaseMouse
Dynex Gateway Dynex 
  hide details  
Reply
post #10 of 13
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaiDinh View Post
Oh man... I feel like the 8800GTS was really a good buy now. ^_^
it is better or equal to performance for less price
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
T5200 Intel 945 Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 950 2GB DDR2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD 160GB SATA Multiformat Double Layer DVD RW Windows Vista Home Premium 15.4" Ultra Bright WXGA TFT/WestingHouse 22" LCD 
KeyboardCaseMouse
Dynex Gateway Dynex 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
T5200 Intel 945 Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 950 2GB DDR2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD 160GB SATA Multiformat Double Layer DVD RW Windows Vista Home Premium 15.4" Ultra Bright WXGA TFT/WestingHouse 22" LCD 
KeyboardCaseMouse
Dynex Gateway Dynex 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Video Game News
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Video Game News › Company of Heroes Goes DirectX 10