Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Software News › XP vs. Vista - A Tale of Framerates: Redux
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

XP vs. Vista - A Tale of Framerates: Redux

post #1 of 8
Thread Starter 
Quote:
The results for ATI were largely very impressive. On ATI hardware, we saw that there was generally only a modest difference between XP and Vista in performance. In our previous article, we noted dramatic framerate discrepancies between the two OSes and perhaps drew a bit too much attention to Windows Vista as being the common denominator. As our readers noted, it would have been better to qualify those statements by stating that our experiences were with NVIDIA hardware alone, and it’s not possible to tell if the problem is intrinsic to the operating system, the NVIDIA hardware or driver revisions, or possibly all of the above.


We’ll make that distinction now – the implementation of the driver revision that we used for our NVIDIA hardware was woefully underperforming in a Vista environment. Again, NVIDIA recently released a new driver set, and we wanted to see if there was any effect in some of the games that were disappointing when run under Vista. From the graph above, we see that the new driver set has closed some of the gaps, while others remain wide open. This is interesting to see, as ATI seems to largely have its ducks in a row concerning Vista.


We were intrigued by the 158.xx revision of the NVIDIA driver set as some games showed marked improvement since our last go-around. However, some titles still exhibited large performance gaps - notably, Need for Speed: Carbon. It's important to note, however, that EA has not patched this title since before the retail release of Vista (about six months ago). Between the recent developer patches and perhaps the new driver revision, the performance gap for Company of Heroes closed to a much more reasonable interval.


It's still very interesting to see the overall trend, though. Even on ATI hardware, seven of our eight gaming titles showed a higher framerate in XP over Vista. In the one case where Vista outpaced XP, it was by an average of 0.9fps. Even on the new NVIDIA drivers, our panel showed the same trend.


Now that we've used new drivers and a more comprehensive panel of hardware, we're at a point where we have to look at this profound trend in the data as significant. Even though it's only by a few frames here and there, it's curious to see that Vista continues to underperform (albeit slightly in most cases) in 3D gaming applications compared to XP.


We hope that this follow-up has placated some of the curiosities about what ATI is doing to make sure that gamers are happy with their gaming experiences in Vista. It’s obvious now that ATI should have been included in our previous round-up as it would have been an interesting contrasting element and would have made the article more complete. In effect, NVIDIA got a pass while we put the blame on Microsoft. From our results, it looks like some blame still does go to Microsoft, but it's also clear that NVIDIA's previous driver revision was largely underperforming. We want to express our thanks to our readers for their thoughts and always holding us accountable for the content that we produce.

http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/articl...50aHVzaWFzdA==


EDIT: Here's Part 1 http://www.overclock.net/news-overcl...+of+Framerates
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
T5200 Intel 945 Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 950 2GB DDR2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD 160GB SATA Multiformat Double Layer DVD RW Windows Vista Home Premium 15.4" Ultra Bright WXGA TFT/WestingHouse 22" LCD 
KeyboardCaseMouse
Dynex Gateway Dynex 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
T5200 Intel 945 Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 950 2GB DDR2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD 160GB SATA Multiformat Double Layer DVD RW Windows Vista Home Premium 15.4" Ultra Bright WXGA TFT/WestingHouse 22" LCD 
KeyboardCaseMouse
Dynex Gateway Dynex 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2 of 8
i think this is all a run around that is made to confuse the consumer...

"Vista is better because its new, and has more eye candy!!!"

Its a ploy... IMO... XP will be better for gaming for a while longer...

But i do agree that some day, vista will pass xp... that day just hasn't came yet...
good enough
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E6600 3ghz Gigabyte GA-EP45-DS3L 9800GT 2x2gb fatility DDR2 1066 
Hard DriveOSMonitorMouse
2 x 74gb raptor raid0 win7 64bit Samsung 245BW Razer 3G diamondback 
Mouse Pad
glass core pad 
  hide details  
Reply
good enough
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E6600 3ghz Gigabyte GA-EP45-DS3L 9800GT 2x2gb fatility DDR2 1066 
Hard DriveOSMonitorMouse
2 x 74gb raptor raid0 win7 64bit Samsung 245BW Razer 3G diamondback 
Mouse Pad
glass core pad 
  hide details  
Reply
post #3 of 8
Quote:
On ATI hardware, we saw that there was generally only a modest difference between XP and Vista in performance.
Well given ATI's current... downfall... this is probly cuz it sucked on both

no further flames plz
It's a computer
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
e6300 @ 2.1Ghz biostar 945p-a7a bfg 7900gs 1x1024MB, 2x512 MB ddr2 667 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD 160GB SATA2 +40gig ide philips combo drive Windows xp pro sp2 21" trinitron crt 
PowerCaseMouse
ultra 500watt coolermaster centurion5 razer diamondback 
  hide details  
Reply
It's a computer
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
e6300 @ 2.1Ghz biostar 945p-a7a bfg 7900gs 1x1024MB, 2x512 MB ddr2 667 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD 160GB SATA2 +40gig ide philips combo drive Windows xp pro sp2 21" trinitron crt 
PowerCaseMouse
ultra 500watt coolermaster centurion5 razer diamondback 
  hide details  
Reply
post #4 of 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoBlo69 View Post
i think this is all a run around that is made to confuse the consumer...

"Vista is better because its new, and has more eye candy!!!"

Its a ploy... IMO... XP will be better for gaming for a while longer...

But i do agree that some day, vista will pass xp... that day just hasn't came yet...
Vista is better than XP. Where you get 50 FPS in Game 1, I still get 45. I can live with that 5 FPS drop when I get better security, a smoother interface, faster load times and an all around better operating system.
Derp Machine
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 7 1800X AX370-Gaming K7 EVGA GTX 1070 FTW 16GB Dark Pro 3200MHz 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB + 2TB Firecuda NZXT Kraken X62 Windows 10 Pro Predator XB271 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Ducky Shine 5 (MX Red) EVGA 850 P2 NZXT S340 Elite Razer DeathAdder Elite 
Mouse PadAudio
Razer Manticor Asus Xonar Essence STX 
  hide details  
Reply
Derp Machine
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 7 1800X AX370-Gaming K7 EVGA GTX 1070 FTW 16GB Dark Pro 3200MHz 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB + 2TB Firecuda NZXT Kraken X62 Windows 10 Pro Predator XB271 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Ducky Shine 5 (MX Red) EVGA 850 P2 NZXT S340 Elite Razer DeathAdder Elite 
Mouse PadAudio
Razer Manticor Asus Xonar Essence STX 
  hide details  
Reply
post #5 of 8
No doubt that vista is the winner.The main theme beats xp.But to me i find that xp is good for now until they fix things up a little more for vista.
 
Back Up PC
(13 items)
 
GF Laptop
(8 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-7700K (Delidded) Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming  ASUS GTX 1070 ROG Strix 8GB 16GB (2x8GB) Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400MHz 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Samsung 850 Pro Series 1TB Samsung F3 1TB  Samsung SH-S223Q/BEBS DVD Burner Corsair Hydro Series H100i v2 
CoolingCoolingCoolingCooling
2 x Scythe Gentle Typhoon AP-15 120MM fans 4 x Enermax TB Silence Red 120mm fans 1 x Coolermaster 200mm fan 1 x Coolermaster 140mm fan 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
1 x Coolermaster 120mm fan Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit ASUS VG248QE 24" 1920x1080 144hz Corsair Strafe RGB Cherry MX Silent 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Corsair AX1200 Cooler Master Cosmos II Logitech G502 Razer Vespula  
AudioAudioAudio
Auzentech X-Fi Forte 7.1 Logitech Z-5500 5.1 Astro A40 Headset 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+ 2.2Ghz Asus M2N68-LA NVIDIA GeForce 6150SE Integrated Corsair XMS2 2GB 4X1GB PC2-6400 DDR2-800 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Western Digital 640GB CB HP DVD/CD-RW Burner Windows 10 Pro x64 Samsung P2370HD @ [1920x1080p] 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G110 Bestec 300W HP Case Logitech G100s 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Celeron N2820 2.13Ghz Dual-core Intel HD Graphics G.SKILL SL Series 4GB DDR3L 1600MHz Samsung 850 Evo 250GB SSD 
OSMonitorMouseMouse Pad
Windows 10 Home 64 Bit 15.6" HD LED LCD Corsair M65 Razer Vespula 
  hide details  
Reply
 
Back Up PC
(13 items)
 
GF Laptop
(8 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-7700K (Delidded) Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming  ASUS GTX 1070 ROG Strix 8GB 16GB (2x8GB) Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400MHz 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Samsung 850 Pro Series 1TB Samsung F3 1TB  Samsung SH-S223Q/BEBS DVD Burner Corsair Hydro Series H100i v2 
CoolingCoolingCoolingCooling
2 x Scythe Gentle Typhoon AP-15 120MM fans 4 x Enermax TB Silence Red 120mm fans 1 x Coolermaster 200mm fan 1 x Coolermaster 140mm fan 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
1 x Coolermaster 120mm fan Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit ASUS VG248QE 24" 1920x1080 144hz Corsair Strafe RGB Cherry MX Silent 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Corsair AX1200 Cooler Master Cosmos II Logitech G502 Razer Vespula  
AudioAudioAudio
Auzentech X-Fi Forte 7.1 Logitech Z-5500 5.1 Astro A40 Headset 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+ 2.2Ghz Asus M2N68-LA NVIDIA GeForce 6150SE Integrated Corsair XMS2 2GB 4X1GB PC2-6400 DDR2-800 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Western Digital 640GB CB HP DVD/CD-RW Burner Windows 10 Pro x64 Samsung P2370HD @ [1920x1080p] 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G110 Bestec 300W HP Case Logitech G100s 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Celeron N2820 2.13Ghz Dual-core Intel HD Graphics G.SKILL SL Series 4GB DDR3L 1600MHz Samsung 850 Evo 250GB SSD 
OSMonitorMouseMouse Pad
Windows 10 Home 64 Bit 15.6" HD LED LCD Corsair M65 Razer Vespula 
  hide details  
Reply
post #6 of 8
It's simple...they are writing drivers for a new operating system. They're not done tweaking them yet...
The performance will eventually be better.
Desktop
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD FX 8120 Gigabyte XA990-UD3 Gigabyte GTX670 Windforce III G. Skill RipJaws 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Crucial M4 Western Digital Blue LG Dual Layer Sata Antec Kuhler 920 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 8 Dell 2007wfp 20.1" Logitech G710+ Corsair Professional HX650 
CaseMouseMouse Pad
Coolermaster Silencio Steelseries Sensei [RAW] Func F10.s 
  hide details  
Reply
Desktop
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD FX 8120 Gigabyte XA990-UD3 Gigabyte GTX670 Windforce III G. Skill RipJaws 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Crucial M4 Western Digital Blue LG Dual Layer Sata Antec Kuhler 920 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 8 Dell 2007wfp 20.1" Logitech G710+ Corsair Professional HX650 
CaseMouseMouse Pad
Coolermaster Silencio Steelseries Sensei [RAW] Func F10.s 
  hide details  
Reply
post #7 of 8
Vista is still crap though, I play city of heroes, was getting solid 70 fps with my system, when I upgraded to Vista Preme, I lost 25 fps. BRING BACK 98SE!
post #8 of 8
vista rox ur sox!

lol i h8 vita cuz' i get bad framwrites, i dun optimize meh computerz fer it but heh, ned to blem it on sumting.
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Athlon XP 1900+ Gigabyte something ax7c SIS315E 1GB mixed DDR 
Hard DrivePowerCase
40GB Western Digital ...dunno? Thermaltake Armor 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Athlon XP 1900+ Gigabyte something ax7c SIS315E 1GB mixed DDR 
Hard DrivePowerCase
40GB Western Digital ...dunno? Thermaltake Armor 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Software News
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Software News › XP vs. Vista - A Tale of Framerates: Redux