Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Monitors and Displays › TV vs. monitor
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

TV vs. monitor - Page 2

post #11 of 12
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16824009102

That one looks good, and a very good price
Graddy
(13 items)
 
  
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
2.93 Ghz Core 2 Duo 9400m + 9600m GT 4GB Apple RAM 320 GB 
OSMonitorCase
Mac OS X + Windows 7 Professional 24" Apple Display (1920x1200) Unibody Alumimum 
  hide details  
Reply
Graddy
(13 items)
 
  
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
2.93 Ghz Core 2 Duo 9400m + 9600m GT 4GB Apple RAM 320 GB 
OSMonitorCase
Mac OS X + Windows 7 Professional 24" Apple Display (1920x1200) Unibody Alumimum 
  hide details  
Reply
post #12 of 12
24" is more expensive, but the resolution is higher. That's the difference.

Also, 24" is the smallest monitor that'll do 1080p, because it's the smallest that has 1080 lines...
Desktop
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD FX 8120 Gigabyte XA990-UD3 Gigabyte GTX670 Windforce III G. Skill RipJaws 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Crucial M4 Western Digital Blue LG Dual Layer Sata Antec Kuhler 920 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 8 Dell 2007wfp 20.1" Logitech G710+ Corsair Professional HX650 
CaseMouseMouse Pad
Coolermaster Silencio Steelseries Sensei [RAW] Func F10.s 
  hide details  
Reply
Desktop
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD FX 8120 Gigabyte XA990-UD3 Gigabyte GTX670 Windforce III G. Skill RipJaws 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Crucial M4 Western Digital Blue LG Dual Layer Sata Antec Kuhler 920 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 8 Dell 2007wfp 20.1" Logitech G710+ Corsair Professional HX650 
CaseMouseMouse Pad
Coolermaster Silencio Steelseries Sensei [RAW] Func F10.s 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Monitors and Displays
Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Monitors and Displays › TV vs. monitor