Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD CPUs › Intel VS AMD low budget CPU
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Intel VS AMD low budget CPU - Page 3

post #21 of 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by highwhey View Post
The 3600+ isn't better than a C2D, maybe in some apps, but not in games.
this is x2 vs PD where the X2 has a 50% advantage
post #22 of 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by CravinR1 View Post
STOCK FOR STOCK, the PD

1900 mhz (3600+ brisbane) * 9 / 6 = 2850 mhz (less than the PD)

BUT Oc'd to 3 ghz * 9 / 6 = 4500 mhz (not many Pd's will hit that)
Ops / Cycle is never proven and the X2 is amazing compared to PD. It's like comparing e6700 with FX-62... I think.. :S
Workoholic
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7 2600K P8Z68-V PRO NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 G.Skill 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Intel 520 Series ASUS DVD+RW Windows 7 Ultimate 20.1" Samsung 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G15 Corsair 620 Modular Lian Li V1020B G9x 
Mouse Pad
Custom Cloth Pad 
  hide details  
Reply
Workoholic
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7 2600K P8Z68-V PRO NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 G.Skill 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Intel 520 Series ASUS DVD+RW Windows 7 Ultimate 20.1" Samsung 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G15 Corsair 620 Modular Lian Li V1020B G9x 
Mouse Pad
Custom Cloth Pad 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: AMD CPUs
Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD CPUs › Intel VS AMD low budget CPU