Overclock.net › Forums › Graphics Cards › Graphics Cards - General › Why 3DMark06 Isn't the Bible
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Why 3DMark06 Isn't the Bible

post #1 of 44
Thread Starter 
Why 3DMark06 Shouldn't Be Taken Too Seriously

by Mr. Bungle



1) quad cores get a huge points advantage in 3DMark, but not in any game out today.

2) the stock benchmarks runs with no anti aliasing and minimal texture filtering. the true test of a gaming system isn't how many frames per second you can get at minimum settings; but rather how high you can turn up the settings while maintaining playable frames.

3) the sea monster is an idiot. i mean come on, all it had to do was jump up from directly beneath the airship and knock it out of the sky. then it could have picked the people out of the water one at a time and enjoyed a tasty meal. instead, it goes around trying to show off, flying over the airship on its first pass. the sea monster got what it deserved.

feel free to add to my list if you want. there may be some things i missed.
The C'roe
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E6320 @ 2.8 Asus P5W DH Deluxe (2) Radeon X1900XTX CF 2GB G.Skill HK 4-4-3-5 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
640 - 2x320 Samsung RAID-0 Dual DVDs XP MCE Acer 22" + Dell 19" LCDs - 2960x1024 rez :D 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech MX Zalman 600W RT Modified Antec 900 Logitech MX 
Mouse Pad
Giant 
  hide details  
Reply
The C'roe
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E6320 @ 2.8 Asus P5W DH Deluxe (2) Radeon X1900XTX CF 2GB G.Skill HK 4-4-3-5 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
640 - 2x320 Samsung RAID-0 Dual DVDs XP MCE Acer 22" + Dell 19" LCDs - 2960x1024 rez :D 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech MX Zalman 600W RT Modified Antec 900 Logitech MX 
Mouse Pad
Giant 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2 of 44
Depending on yor Gpu's core and memory speed certain combinations might get higher scores even though in the real world/other games they will do better
Oh The Glorrryyy
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD 630 MSI THANG 2x4830 8gb Gskill Ripjaws 
Hard DriveMonitorPowerCase
2x250gb 1x100gb 1x20gb 1920x1080 23in  500watt Rosewill Open Air 
  hide details  
Reply
Oh The Glorrryyy
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD 630 MSI THANG 2x4830 8gb Gskill Ripjaws 
Hard DriveMonitorPowerCase
2x250gb 1x100gb 1x20gb 1920x1080 23in  500watt Rosewill Open Air 
  hide details  
Reply
post #3 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by iampoor View Post
Depending on yor Gpu's core and memory speed certain combinations might get higher scores even though in the real world/other games they will do better

What?




I agree Bungle, it should all be ran on two different settings, the default setting, and Full Setting where everything is enabled. But then again scores should only be compared if they are running the same resolution.
FAKE RIG 5000
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
INTEL QX9770 ASUS RAMPAGE EXTREME CROSSFIRE 2 x 4870X2 8GB CORSAIR DOMINATOR DDR3-2000 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
6 x VELOCIRAPTOR 300GB RAID10 5 x PLEXTOR PX-716AL SLOT-LOAD VISTA ULTIMATE X64 30" APPLE M9179LL/A DISPLAY 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
LOGITECH G15 SILVERSTONE DA1200 LIAN LI PC-A71B LOGITECH G9 
Mouse Pad
DIAMOND PLATED STEEL 
  hide details  
Reply
FAKE RIG 5000
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
INTEL QX9770 ASUS RAMPAGE EXTREME CROSSFIRE 2 x 4870X2 8GB CORSAIR DOMINATOR DDR3-2000 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
6 x VELOCIRAPTOR 300GB RAID10 5 x PLEXTOR PX-716AL SLOT-LOAD VISTA ULTIMATE X64 30" APPLE M9179LL/A DISPLAY 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
LOGITECH G15 SILVERSTONE DA1200 LIAN LI PC-A71B LOGITECH G9 
Mouse Pad
DIAMOND PLATED STEEL 
  hide details  
Reply
post #4 of 44
If you get higher scores in 3DMark06, you'll have higher frame rates in games. I trust the results on it myself....
 
X79 Build
(13 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7-6950X @ 4.0Ghz Asus Rampage V Extreme [Bios:3101] 2x EVGA GeForce Titan X SC Editions in SLI 32GB (4×8) Corsair Dominator Platinums (3000Mhz) 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Samsung 950 Pro 512GB M.2 Nvme 2x 256GB Vertex 4 SSD (RAID-0) 2x 2TB Seagate Barracuda [Storage] Pioneer BDR-207DBK Blu-ray Writer 
CoolingOSMonitorPower
Corsair H105 (Push/Pull) Windows 10 Pro x64 2x 27" Asus PG278Q ROG Swift 144hz  Corsair AX1500i Digital ATX 80 Plus Titanium 
CaseAudio
Lian Li PC-O8WX ATX Cube Case Logitech Z906 5.1 Surround 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-3930K (C2) @ (4.6Ghz) Asus Rampage IV Extreme X79 (Bios 3204) 3x EVGA GTX780Ti's SC Editions 32GB (4x8GB) G-Skill TridentX 2400Mhz 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
2x 256GB OCZ Vertex 4's (RAID-0) 2x 2TB Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 64MB Cache Pioneer BDR-207DBK Blu-ray Writer Corsair H105 (Push/Pull) 
OSMonitorPowerCase
Win7 Pro 64Bit & Win10 Pro 64Bit Asus ROG Swift (2560x1440 @144hz) Corsair AX1200 + Corsair RED sleeved cables Coolermaster Cosmos II Ultra 
  hide details  
Reply
 
X79 Build
(13 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7-6950X @ 4.0Ghz Asus Rampage V Extreme [Bios:3101] 2x EVGA GeForce Titan X SC Editions in SLI 32GB (4×8) Corsair Dominator Platinums (3000Mhz) 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Samsung 950 Pro 512GB M.2 Nvme 2x 256GB Vertex 4 SSD (RAID-0) 2x 2TB Seagate Barracuda [Storage] Pioneer BDR-207DBK Blu-ray Writer 
CoolingOSMonitorPower
Corsair H105 (Push/Pull) Windows 10 Pro x64 2x 27" Asus PG278Q ROG Swift 144hz  Corsair AX1500i Digital ATX 80 Plus Titanium 
CaseAudio
Lian Li PC-O8WX ATX Cube Case Logitech Z906 5.1 Surround 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-3930K (C2) @ (4.6Ghz) Asus Rampage IV Extreme X79 (Bios 3204) 3x EVGA GTX780Ti's SC Editions 32GB (4x8GB) G-Skill TridentX 2400Mhz 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
2x 256GB OCZ Vertex 4's (RAID-0) 2x 2TB Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 64MB Cache Pioneer BDR-207DBK Blu-ray Writer Corsair H105 (Push/Pull) 
OSMonitorPowerCase
Win7 Pro 64Bit & Win10 Pro 64Bit Asus ROG Swift (2560x1440 @144hz) Corsair AX1200 + Corsair RED sleeved cables Coolermaster Cosmos II Ultra 
  hide details  
Reply
post #5 of 44
What I meant was..

Supose your core is set to 500mhz and your memory is at 2.0ghz

Now suppose it only needs that memory at 1.6ghz

Now there is 400mhz of unused bandwith.

ANother game could use all 2.0ghz of abndwith but only need a 400mhz core speed.

It was just an idea I had....
Oh The Glorrryyy
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD 630 MSI THANG 2x4830 8gb Gskill Ripjaws 
Hard DriveMonitorPowerCase
2x250gb 1x100gb 1x20gb 1920x1080 23in  500watt Rosewill Open Air 
  hide details  
Reply
Oh The Glorrryyy
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD 630 MSI THANG 2x4830 8gb Gskill Ripjaws 
Hard DriveMonitorPowerCase
2x250gb 1x100gb 1x20gb 1920x1080 23in  500watt Rosewill Open Air 
  hide details  
Reply
post #6 of 44
Interesting post MrBungle.

A Rep +1 me thinks

Quote:
Originally Posted by iampoor
What I meant was..

Supose your core is set to 500mhz and your memory is at 2.0ghz

Now suppose it only needs that memory at 1.6ghz

Now there is 400mhz of unused bandwith.

ANother game could use all 2.0ghz of abndwith but only need a 400mhz core speed.

It was just an idea I had....
That is so wrong its untrue. For starters you do realise that no game in existence has access to the actual hardware of the graphics card or has any say on how well it performs? The game application uses the drivers, themselves attached to the very kernel of the operateing system, to tell the hardware what to do. As a rule of thumb, the higher the resources (hardware specs and capabilities) the better performance you get in a given application.

The only time when this is untrue is in cases where people have core, shader and memory clocks on a graphics card, rather than just core and memory. Overclocking via software dynamically raises the shader clock as the core clock is raised. However, some shader to memory frequencies will be detrimental to performance if the shader clock itself is unable to operate at the correct syncronisation.

Bottom Line

Game applications do not control the bandwidth of communication between the GPU and RAM on the graphics card. This role is performed by the onboard MCH. Higher resources (clocks) means more performance in rendering the images you see on your screen.
post #7 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by t4ct1c47 View Post
That is so wrong its untrue. For starters you do realise that no game in existence has access to the actual hardware of the graphics card or has any say on how well it performs? The game application uses the drivers, themselves attached to the very kernel of the operateing system, to tell the hardware what to do. As a rule of thumb, the higher the resources (hardware specs and capabilities) the better performance you get in a given application.

The only time when this is untrue is in cases where people have core, shader and memory clocks on a graphics card, rather than just core and memory. Overclocking via software dynamically raises the shader clock as the core clock is raised. However, some shader to memory frequencies will be detrimental to performance if the shader clock itself is unable to operate at the correct syncronisation.

hmmm I sorta see but alright.

Just like I said it was just an idea I had.

I have no proof of anything

Also I know its not common.

But I was suggesting a possible situation
Oh The Glorrryyy
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD 630 MSI THANG 2x4830 8gb Gskill Ripjaws 
Hard DriveMonitorPowerCase
2x250gb 1x100gb 1x20gb 1920x1080 23in  500watt Rosewill Open Air 
  hide details  
Reply
Oh The Glorrryyy
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD 630 MSI THANG 2x4830 8gb Gskill Ripjaws 
Hard DriveMonitorPowerCase
2x250gb 1x100gb 1x20gb 1920x1080 23in  500watt Rosewill Open Air 
  hide details  
Reply
post #8 of 44
well 06 is a year or two old now and where benching card that came out this year on it,I think that you will see better socres with more tests and test options on 07,And by the way when does 07 come out?
    
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Intel Core 2 Duo 2.00GHz ATI Radeon HD 3650 512MB RAM 4GB DDR2 800MHZ One 250GB and one 320GB 
Optical DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
DVD-RW Windows vista  17" Toshiba Toshiba 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Toshiba Touchpad None 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Intel Core 2 Duo 2.00GHz ATI Radeon HD 3650 512MB RAM 4GB DDR2 800MHZ One 250GB and one 320GB 
Optical DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
DVD-RW Windows vista  17" Toshiba Toshiba 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Toshiba Touchpad None 
  hide details  
Reply
post #9 of 44
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mhill2029 View Post
If you get higher scores in 3DMark06, you'll have higher frame rates in games. I trust the results on it myself....
the idea came to me while i was setting up my new CrossFire tonight. i realized that i now have 1 Gigabyte of VRAM. this gives me no advantage whatsoever on 3DMark, but i can now run games on any size monitor i please.

then i put FEAR in to give it a run. 1280x1024 rez, most settings maxed except only 4xAA and 4xAF with soft shadows turned off. i was averaging about 100 fps in the game. then i switched to my friend's 22" monitor, set the game at 1680x1050, 6xSSAA, 16xHQAF, soft shadows on and all other settings maxed. the result? the exact same framerate i got with lower rez and lower settings. i can't wait to try Stalker and all my demanding games now.

my 3DMark06 score was about 60% higher on my first CF run, but the score was only higher because i got more frames per second. it doesn't take into account the fact that i can now power a 60" high def TV. it doesn't know that i have 96 shaders or that i can play with SSAA and HQAF at crazy high levels without affecting framerates by much at all.

anyway, i broke 10k my first time out with no OC . not bad for a couple of year-old video cards and a budget processor.
The C'roe
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E6320 @ 2.8 Asus P5W DH Deluxe (2) Radeon X1900XTX CF 2GB G.Skill HK 4-4-3-5 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
640 - 2x320 Samsung RAID-0 Dual DVDs XP MCE Acer 22" + Dell 19" LCDs - 2960x1024 rez :D 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech MX Zalman 600W RT Modified Antec 900 Logitech MX 
Mouse Pad
Giant 
  hide details  
Reply
The C'roe
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E6320 @ 2.8 Asus P5W DH Deluxe (2) Radeon X1900XTX CF 2GB G.Skill HK 4-4-3-5 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
640 - 2x320 Samsung RAID-0 Dual DVDs XP MCE Acer 22" + Dell 19" LCDs - 2960x1024 rez :D 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech MX Zalman 600W RT Modified Antec 900 Logitech MX 
Mouse Pad
Giant 
  hide details  
Reply
post #10 of 44
07 should come out by the end of this year.

My 2 cents to this is kind of like how games should put specs for systems on the back of their boxes

Min, recommended, and 60 fps no lag.

Anyone else agree?
Megaton 2.0
(18 items)
 
Mini v2.0
(13 items)
 
Minecraft Server
(15 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
q9650 E0 GF9300 ITX Wifi-I-E MSI GTS450 Cyclone OC G.Skill Pi (2x2) 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
160gb WD Scorpio Black Raid 0 Slot load Windows 7 x64 19" NEC Flatron 
PowerCase
400w 1u server (modded) 50 Cal Ammo Can (Fully Custom) 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
q8300 EVGA 750i FTW nvidia fx 4000 pci 4x2 ddr2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
320gb Seagate na big tower Windows 7 pro x64 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
remote desktop na Thermaltake 420w gutted case 
MouseMouse PadAudio
na na na 
  hide details  
Reply
Megaton 2.0
(18 items)
 
Mini v2.0
(13 items)
 
Minecraft Server
(15 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
q9650 E0 GF9300 ITX Wifi-I-E MSI GTS450 Cyclone OC G.Skill Pi (2x2) 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
160gb WD Scorpio Black Raid 0 Slot load Windows 7 x64 19" NEC Flatron 
PowerCase
400w 1u server (modded) 50 Cal Ammo Can (Fully Custom) 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
q8300 EVGA 750i FTW nvidia fx 4000 pci 4x2 ddr2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
320gb Seagate na big tower Windows 7 pro x64 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
remote desktop na Thermaltake 420w gutted case 
MouseMouse PadAudio
na na na 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Graphics Cards - General
Overclock.net › Forums › Graphics Cards › Graphics Cards - General › Why 3DMark06 Isn't the Bible