Originally Posted by DeltaUpsilon
Also, you stated you got a 3.5Ghz overclock at 438x9? You mean 438x8, right?
Actually I tried both 438x8 and 388x9 ...
I think I fat fingered that one in the post... the 388x9 was definitely more stable in the end.
Originally Posted by IwubAMD
lol so it was in fact scorching, and it wasnt even stable, wana go back and edit all the places (ive only seen two but im sure theres more) you made that wonderful claim?
I made the edit on the main page in question. Pretty much that was the only one.
I'm sure that if you find others, you will be quick to point them out... right? Sure...
Like I said, it was a mistake due to version differences... please can you spare the "whipping".
We appreciate the due diligence that you and your cohorts have gone through to make sure noone reports "outlandish claims" and whatnot (regardless of intent or not).