post #241 of 241
Quote:
Originally Posted by Murlocke View Post
I thought he said 2x on paper? I might be wrong. 2x on paper is very different than 2x in real world application and games... The current 8800GTX in SLI needs 3GHZ or more (C2D speeds) to see any type of benefit on my computer. Even if the cards are 2x faster, theres no way they would be 2x faster in a game because the bottleneck would be higher and cause it to run slower.

I honestly don't care how fast the 8900GTX compared to the 8800GTX, either way i'm most likely getting two....

If this article is correct than my source is wrong, which is possible. If hes wrong i'm gonna be very mad at him too.

I do know for sure that the G92 is the 8900GTX/8950GX2 though. Because my source has actually sent me pictures of the 8900GTX and 8950GX2. As for the specs, I might be wrong. The specs arn't even final yet.



Sorry, I thought you were trying to say I was lying. I missunderstood.
You're right...I guess it does make sense now that you put that way, perhaps that's the reason they might wait and release the 9800xxx till 08 since new CPU's are going to be released, PENRYN!!! oh yeah
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD 3600x2 ASUS M2A-MVP (Crossfire) 8800GT 512 701/2000 4GB Crucial RAM(Lanfest ED.) 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2x320gb Seagate RAID SONY DVD+RW XP/Vista westy 
PowerCase
SILVERSTONE SST-ST75ZF(750W) 
  hide details  
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD 3600x2 ASUS M2A-MVP (Crossfire) 8800GT 512 701/2000 4GB Crucial RAM(Lanfest ED.) 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2x320gb Seagate RAID SONY DVD+RW XP/Vista westy 
PowerCase
SILVERSTONE SST-ST75ZF(750W) 
  hide details