Your post is uninformed rubbish.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis
Yeah, well it is hard for me to see that when it took Vista 20 minutes to install and Ubuntu never did install. Sure, if you want to actually take the time to investigate your problem... all the power to you.
|
Most people manage to install Ubuntu fine. If you had a problem, tell us what it was, and maybe we can shed light on the issue.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis
But since installing is the easiest part and I couldn't get that to work, I can't even fathom how much of a pain the actual OS will be.
|
Most people manage the installation easily. You are drawing this conclusion without actually having tried it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis
You have PC gamers, graphic artists, video editors, and pretty much every major company with a computer network using Windows. Sure, they may use it for server applications, but not in the office on all the computers their employees work on.
|
Yeah that's not true. Plenty of companies, governments, etc... run Linux on all of their computers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis
The companies won't ever switch because they have people hired that are trained in Windows, so they won't know what to do at all. Plus, I highly doubt that Linux can give them the same support that Microsoft can.
|
Linux isn't hard to use, plenty of companies use it. Linux isn't a company, A company like Canonical, Red Hat, Novell, etc... can give them far better support than M$ can.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis
That is a big population, and they all won't be able to use Linux. Sure, you may have the occasional granny that has her PC just for internet and email. But most people do at least one of the above. So, since Linux has no native support, not emulation, but native support for that stuff... then nobody is going to use it. So, until they do support it... why must you keep arguing this failed argument all the time?
|
Because you are wrong, for 99% of tasks, there is Linux software to do it. No, you can't be a proffesional graphics artist and use Linux really, as Photoshop is necesary, no you can't really Game under Linux, no you can't really do professional video editing, but beyond that, there is little Linux can't do - and it can do more than windows in a lot of areas too.
If you are just editing graphics or pictures for anything other than proffesional print, you can do it in the GIMP, which is better than basically everything except for Photoshop, including Photoshop elements. I can mock up web designs perfectly well in the GIMP. I can also edit videos with Kino. Sure, it's not as powerful as Final Cut, but it's perfectly usable.
You have not used Linux, you have said so yourself - so this is all based on stuff you have heard wrongly, or presumed wrongly. The whole point of this thread was to try it and talk about your experience, good job for missing that one.
Edited by lattyware - 8/11/08 at 7:00am