Originally Posted by thlnk3r
Pio, my bad. I thought you were referring to the MSI K8N Plat. I guess I should look more carefully at screenshots
If DDR510 is possible can you post benchmarks comparing the two (DDR400 2-3-2-5-2T vs DDR510 3-3-3-8-2T)?
Well, it turns out DDR510 is possible, just not stable. I was able to run Everest Benchmark @ 3-3-3-8-2T (DDR510). I got 7310MB/s read. I didn't take a screenshot, because I was trying to make it stable. And you can see what DDR400 @ 2-3-2-5-2T does on my stability post a few posts ago.
I am now testing DDR400 @ 2-2-2-5-2T (7/9). So far, so good. It doesn't bench nearly as well as DDR510 with looser timings (roughly 59xxMB/s read at DDR400, 2-2-2-5), but if its stable, I'll go with it. I am running S&M right now. It seems pio has grown addicted to this S&M test