Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD - General › Overclocking 754 3200+
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Overclocking 754 3200+ - Page 4

post #31 of 38
Thread Starter 
so the 2 512 sticks be better than the 1gb stick? Looks like the Cas Latency has a .5 difference. Oh and i got it to 2.56 now still running stable. Gonna run orthos overnight and see how it does. Boots alot faster than my Dual core 3800+ that's running at 2.62 with a1gb of Crucial
post #32 of 38
Thread Starter 
2.56 stable!

[Mar 7 06:14] Test 3, 19000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M4358145 using FFT length 224K.
[Mar 7 06:18] Test 4, 19000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M4358143 using FFT length 224K.
[Mar 7 06:21] Test 5, 19000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M4298769 using FFT length 224K.
[Mar 7 06:25] Self-test 224K passed!
[Mar 7 06:25] Test 1, 22000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M3835553 using FFT length 192K.
[Mar 7 06:29] Test 2, 22000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M3785551 using FFT length 192K.
[Mar 7 06:32] Test 3, 22000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M3735553 using FFT length 192K.
[Mar 7 06:35] Test 4, 22000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M3735551 using FFT length 192K.
[Mar 7 06:38] Test 5, 22000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M3688945 using FFT length 192K.
[Mar 7 06:42] Self-test 192K passed!
[Mar 7 06:42] Test 1, 100000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M983041 using FFT length 48K.
[Mar 7 06:46] Test 2, 100000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M974849 using FFT length 48K.
[Mar 7 06:49] Test 3, 100000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M942079 using FFT length 48K.
[Mar 7 06:54] Test 4, 100000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M933889 using FFT length 48K.
[Mar 7 06:57] Test 5, 100000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M917503 using FFT length 48K.
[Mar 7 07:01] Self-test 48K passed!
[Mar 7 07:01] Test 1, 84000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M1150221 using FFT length 56K.
[Mar 7 07:05] Test 2, 84000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M1144221 using FFT length 56K.
[Mar 7 07:08] Test 3, 84000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M1122001 using FFT length 56K.
[Mar 7 07:12] Test 4, 84000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M1108511 using FFT length 56K.
[Mar 7 07:15] Test 5, 84000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M1100881 using FFT length 56K.
[Mar 7 07:20] Self-test 56K passed!
[Mar 7 07:20] Test 1, 27000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M3242961 using FFT length 160K.
[Mar 7 07:23] Test 2, 27000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M3172959 using FFT length 160K.
[Mar 7 07:26] Test 3, 27000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M3112961 using FFT length 160K.
[Mar 7 07:30] Test 4, 27000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M3112959 using FFT length 160K.
[Mar 7 07:33] Test 5, 27000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M2949121 using FFT length 160K.
[Mar 7 07:37] Self-test 160K passed!
[Mar 7 07:37] Test 1, 34000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M2605473 using FFT length 128K.
[Mar 7 07:41] Test 2, 34000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M2584313 using FFT length 128K.
[Mar 7 07:45] Test 3, 34000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M2573917 using FFT length 128K.
[Mar 7 07:49] Test 4, 34000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M2540831 using FFT length 128K.
[Mar 7 07:52] Self-test 128K passed!
[Mar 7 07:52] Test 1, 75000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M1322851 using FFT length 64K.
[Mar 7 07:56] Test 2, 75000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M1310721 using FFT length 64K.
[Mar 7 08:00] Test 3, 75000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M1310719 using FFT length 64K.
[Mar 7 08:04] Test 4, 75000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M1300993 using FFT length 64K.
[Mar 7 08:07] Test 5, 75000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M1288771 using FFT length 64K.
[Mar 7 08:11] Self-test 64K passed!
[Mar 7 08:11] Test 1, 56000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M1633941 using FFT length 80K.
[Mar 7 08:15] Test 2, 56000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M1611557 using FFT length 80K.
[Mar 7 08:19] Test 3, 56000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M1599549 using FFT length 80K.
[Mar 7 08:23] Test 4, 56000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M1577771 using FFT length 80K.
[Mar 7 08:26] Test 5, 56000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M1555947 using FFT length 80K.
[Mar 7 08:30] Self-test 80K passed!
[Mar 7 08:30] Test 1, 39000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M2244765 using FFT length 112K.
[Mar 7 08:35] Test 2, 39000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M2236671 using FFT length 112K.
[Mar 7 08:38] Test 3, 39000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M2222517 using FFT length 112K.
[Mar 7 08:42] Test 4, 39000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M2193011 using FFT length 112K.
[Mar 7 08:46] Self-test 112K passed!
[Mar 7 08:46] Test 1, 46000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M1933071 using FFT length 96K.
[Mar 7 08:50] Test 2, 46000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M1911957 using FFT length 96K.
[Mar 7 08:54] Test 3, 46000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M1899247 using FFT length 96K.
[Mar 7 08:58] Test 4, 46000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M1877431 using FFT length 96K.
[Mar 7 09:01] Self-test 96K passed!
[Mar 7 09:01] Test 1, 3100 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M24903681 using FFT length 1280K.
[Mar 7 09:06] Test 2, 3100 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M24903679 using FFT length 1280K.
[Mar 7 09:09] Test 3, 3100 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M24092961 using FFT length 1280K.
[Mar 7 09:13] Test 4, 3100 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M23892959 using FFT length 1280K.
[Mar 7 09:17] Self-test 1280K passed!
[Mar 7 09:17] Test 1, 2500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M29311553 using FFT length 1536K.
[Mar 7 09:21] Test 2, 2500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M28811551 using FFT length 1536K.
[Mar 7 09:24] Test 3, 2500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M28311553 using FFT length 1536K.
[Mar 7 09:29] Test 4, 2500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M28311551 using FFT length 1536K.
[Mar 7 09:32] Self-test 1536K passed!
[Mar 7 09:32] Test 1, 2100 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M34230145 using FFT length 1792K.
[Mar 7 09:37] Test 2, 2100 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M33730143 using FFT length 1792K.
[Mar 7 09:41] Test 3, 2100 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M33030145 using FFT length 1792K.
[Mar 7 09:45] Test 4, 2100 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M33030143 using FFT length 1792K.
[Mar 7 09:48] Self-test 1792K passed!
[Mar 7 09:48] Test 1, 1900 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M39151585 using FFT length 2048K.
[Mar 7 09:52] Test 2, 1900 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M38748737 using FFT length 2048K.
[Mar 7 09:56] Test 3, 1900 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M38251583 using FFT length 2048K.
[Mar 7 10:01] Test 4, 1900 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M37748737 using FFT length 2048K.
[Mar 7 10:04] Self-test 2048K passed!
[Mar 7 10:04] Test 1, 1500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M48185921 using FFT length 2560K.
[Mar 7 10:09] Test 2, 1500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M47185921 using FFT length 2560K.
[Mar 7 10:13] Test 3, 1500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M47185919 using FFT length 2560K.
[Mar 7 10:17] Test 4, 1500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M46185919 using FFT length 2560K.
[Mar 7 10:21] Self-test 2560K passed!
[Mar 7 10:21] Test 1, 1200 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M57623105 using FFT length 3072K.
[Mar 7 10:26] Test 2, 1200 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M56623105 using FFT length 3072K.
[Mar 7 10:29] Test 3, 1200 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M56623103 using FFT length 3072K.
[Mar 7 10:34] Test 4, 1200 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M55623103 using FFT length 3072K.
[Mar 7 10:37] Self-test 3072K passed!
[Mar 7 10:37] Test 1, 1000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M68060289 using FFT length 3584K.
[Mar 7 10:42] Test 2, 1000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M67060287 using FFT length 3584K.
[Mar 7 10:46] Test 3, 1000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M66060289 using FFT length 3584K.
[Mar 7 10:50] Test 4, 1000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M66060287 using FFT length 3584K.
[Mar 7 10:54] Self-test 3584K passed!
[Mar 7 10:54] Test 1, 900 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M77497473 using FFT length 4096K.
[Mar 7 10:58] Test 2, 900 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M76497471 using FFT length 4096K.
[Mar 7 11:02] Test 3, 900 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M75497473 using FFT length 4096K.
[Mar 7 11:07] Test 4, 900 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M75497471 using FFT length 4096K.
[Mar 7 11:10] Self-test 4096K passed!
[Mar 7 11:10] Test 1, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M18874369 using FFT length 1024K.
[Mar 7 11:15] Test 2, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M18874367 using FFT length 1024K.
[Mar 7 11:16] Torture Test ran 10 hours, 27 minutes - 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[Mar 7 11:16] Work thread stopped.

Not bad for an old school venice! Top out at 50C. My new zalman cooler should be here in a couple days
post #33 of 38
Nice, i give you props for the prime95 as well. I just got a Zalman 9500 for my 3200 and i tell you what, at 2.64 ghz, i have yet to see it get past 36 degrees while gaming with the fan turned down. btw, what kind of RAM did you settle on?
Black Sunshine
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II X4 925 Gigabyte M750SLI-DS4 XFX GeForce 9800GTX+ 2x2Gb. Kingston HyperX 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
500gb Western Digital Caviar Lite-On DVD RW+ XP Home/Vista Business/Ubuntu Acer x213h 1080p 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
ABS M1 Antec True Power Trio 550W Cooler Master Centurion 590 Logitech Mx500 
Mouse Pad
*the desk* 
  hide details  
Reply
Black Sunshine
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II X4 925 Gigabyte M750SLI-DS4 XFX GeForce 9800GTX+ 2x2Gb. Kingston HyperX 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
500gb Western Digital Caviar Lite-On DVD RW+ XP Home/Vista Business/Ubuntu Acer x213h 1080p 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
ABS M1 Antec True Power Trio 550W Cooler Master Centurion 590 Logitech Mx500 
Mouse Pad
*the desk* 
  hide details  
Reply
post #34 of 38
Thread Starter 
i've still got that cheap micsys in there... i just used the aggresive timing feature on the mobo. I believe it could go farther but imma wait till my zalman gets here
post #35 of 38
What did you end up timing your RAM to? I have left mine stock just for the fact that I dont have the time to really mess with the timings that much. I just put a RAM limiter on them so they are locked in at 133mhz instead of 200mhz.
Black Sunshine
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II X4 925 Gigabyte M750SLI-DS4 XFX GeForce 9800GTX+ 2x2Gb. Kingston HyperX 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
500gb Western Digital Caviar Lite-On DVD RW+ XP Home/Vista Business/Ubuntu Acer x213h 1080p 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
ABS M1 Antec True Power Trio 550W Cooler Master Centurion 590 Logitech Mx500 
Mouse Pad
*the desk* 
  hide details  
Reply
Black Sunshine
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II X4 925 Gigabyte M750SLI-DS4 XFX GeForce 9800GTX+ 2x2Gb. Kingston HyperX 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
500gb Western Digital Caviar Lite-On DVD RW+ XP Home/Vista Business/Ubuntu Acer x213h 1080p 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
ABS M1 Antec True Power Trio 550W Cooler Master Centurion 590 Logitech Mx500 
Mouse Pad
*the desk* 
  hide details  
Reply
post #36 of 38
That old Venice can take a full load of 55c no problem
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
X4 965 ASUS M4A79 Deluxe 9800GTx2 2x2G OCZ Reapers 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
500G WD Black LiteOn CD/DVD R/W Win7 64 22'' ws Acer AL2223W 
KeyboardPowerMouse
MS KU462 Natural SS DA750 MS 5 button 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
X4 965 ASUS M4A79 Deluxe 9800GTx2 2x2G OCZ Reapers 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
500G WD Black LiteOn CD/DVD R/W Win7 64 22'' ws Acer AL2223W 
KeyboardPowerMouse
MS KU462 Natural SS DA750 MS 5 button 
  hide details  
Reply
post #37 of 38
Thread Starter 
well the ram is still sitting at auto just have agressive timing turned on. If i try and manually change the ram speeds or timing it will not go any higher than 2.25ghz.
post #38 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by MiniTuckin View Post
this thing is faster than my AM2 3800+ which will only clock to 2.3.
What kind of junk motherboard were you using that your 3800 could only get 2.3Ghz

My old X2 3800 AM2 would do 2.9Ghz on 1.45v VCore with 4x512mb DDR2 533mhz
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: AMD - General
Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD - General › Overclocking 754 3200+