Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Memory › OCZ Reaper vs. Crucial Ballisitx
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

OCZ Reaper vs. Crucial Ballisitx - Page 2

post #11 of 12
The Ballistix oc well provided you can keep them cool.
Bypass the PC6400 and look hard at the PC8500 Ballistix instead.
The Reaper is mostly show from what I've read.
GameOn....
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
3570 K AsRock 77 Edition 4 Sapphire 7850 2gb 8G GSkill Ripjaws 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
SEA 1TB, 7200 64 Lite-On / Samsung 22x 7 64 Samsung P2770, 27" 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Saitek Corsair 650TX NXZT Tempest Razor Death Adder 
Mouse PadAudio
XTRAC Ripper Logitech 5 channel 
  hide details  
Reply
GameOn....
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
3570 K AsRock 77 Edition 4 Sapphire 7850 2gb 8G GSkill Ripjaws 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
SEA 1TB, 7200 64 Lite-On / Samsung 22x 7 64 Samsung P2770, 27" 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Saitek Corsair 650TX NXZT Tempest Razor Death Adder 
Mouse PadAudio
XTRAC Ripper Logitech 5 channel 
  hide details  
Reply
post #12 of 12
Thread Starter 
I'm deff not getting Crucial. Now that they are one sided, everyone says the suck. They dies extremely quick. Only the old ones are good.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Memory
Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Memory › OCZ Reaper vs. Crucial Ballisitx