I've been experimenting with different FSB and multi settings and found that the best benchmark score in 3DMark06 so far is when I set FSB to 420MHz, multi 9, although I haven't yet gone over 430MHz. The highest I have had my CPU running is with 390MHz FSB, multi 10.
So I decided it was time to check stability at different settings. And I get the message below; at 430MHz FSB this occurs after 6 minutes and at 420MHz after 28 minutes and its always on core 3.
FATAL ERROR: Rounding was 0.5, expected less than 0.4 Hardware failure detected, consult stress .txt file. Etc, etc......
When running Prime96 my CPU is within Intels recommended thermal specification but there is a difference in core temps, these seem to range as follows:
CPU: between 50 and 62
Core1:between 44 and 56
Core2:between 44 and 56
Core3:between 50 and 60
Core4:between 50 and 60
My Vcore is set at 1.3625v, memory to CPU ratio is 1:1.
I haven't had time yet but I'm going to run Prime96 at stock setting to see what results I get.
Have I got a CPU with a bad core or is this quite common when overclocking, have I just got to find the sweet spot?
So I decided it was time to check stability at different settings. And I get the message below; at 430MHz FSB this occurs after 6 minutes and at 420MHz after 28 minutes and its always on core 3.
FATAL ERROR: Rounding was 0.5, expected less than 0.4 Hardware failure detected, consult stress .txt file. Etc, etc......
When running Prime96 my CPU is within Intels recommended thermal specification but there is a difference in core temps, these seem to range as follows:
CPU: between 50 and 62
Core1:between 44 and 56
Core2:between 44 and 56
Core3:between 50 and 60
Core4:between 50 and 60
My Vcore is set at 1.3625v, memory to CPU ratio is 1:1.
I haven't had time yet but I'm going to run Prime96 at stock setting to see what results I get.
Have I got a CPU with a bad core or is this quite common when overclocking, have I just got to find the sweet spot?










