Originally Posted by iandroo888;15123394
would be nice to have the range of the 70-200 and at 2.8. was considering the 70-200 cuz its the like focal range i dont have now. i have 12-105 covered.. 12-24 and 18-105... even tho the difference from 105 to 200 may not be that much (i think), it would be nice to have the focal length i think.
really about the 24-70? i thought the demand on wanting VR 24-70 would make it be produced faster... guess not D: would have thought they'd work on a VR version after the 24-70 had been out for a few years already
I would dump your 12-105 in favor of a Nikon 17-55. No reason really to own a 24-70 on a crop body.
And I wouldn't get so caught up in covering every millimeter of a particular range with your lenses. It's pointless to think in those terms IMO. Think about what usages
you need in a lens. If you need a fast standard walkaround zoom, then look for a 17-55/2.8 or equivalent. If you need a longer sports lens, look for a 70-200.