Originally Posted by tweakboy
Just a protoype , Also thats way too much storage, and the hard drive will have to work over time, if ya know what I mean. Soo it will get busted very fast. I can't rely on that, as that much space is pointless. even 250GB is way way too much, and yull never fill up the hard drive,,, Hard drive space is over rated. Remember back in the old days if you had a 20GB hard drive u were the talk of the town. Ok lets say each mp3 @ 192kbps and a average size of 8mb , you times that by 5000, your using 40GB ,,, hehe soo ya terabyte and this new tech is junk, theres better things to worry about, like getting a nice solid HD, the higher the space the slower it will perform. 250gb is good range , even 160gb ,, one for OS, and one for backing up purposes or downloads or firefox cache or page file.. etc.... Just the fact that this is not a top vendor tell me it will brake down. whats the use of a hard drive braking down and u only had filled up 140gb maybe. Soo the size capacity is not important. Why not get something stable that will live for 20 years... hmmmm
I agree, I don't really use much more than 100GB of HDD space and I don't see a need in anything more than 250GB for the average user. I would rather see more money and time invested in reliability and speed. I couldn't imagine having 500,000GB of files on a HDD and it suddenly failing on me.