New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Quad teams? - Page 3

post #21 of 89
Sounds good Taeric. But here's where my confusion is.. "they could fold on their quad with the points throttled back to the level of other 2 core contributors". That level would be different for each team. I propose an easier way of calculating. The ones folding on 4 cores instead of 2 would simply have their points halved. 32,400 per week would be counted as 16,200. That way they could still climb up fast on the overall leaderboard, but their points would be comparable with a 2 core. It'd also be much easier to calculate. ~JadeMiner~
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E8600@4.5+GHz 24/7 Stable Asus P5Q Pro EVGA GTX 285 - 675/1728/1269 G.Skill 1066 2 Gigs 
Hard DriveOSPowerCase
Western Digital 320GB SATA2 7200rpm 16M Kubuntu Linux 64bit Raidmax 550W RaidMax Smilodon 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E8600@4.5+GHz 24/7 Stable Asus P5Q Pro EVGA GTX 285 - 675/1728/1269 G.Skill 1066 2 Gigs 
Hard DriveOSPowerCase
Western Digital 320GB SATA2 7200rpm 16M Kubuntu Linux 64bit Raidmax 550W RaidMax Smilodon 
  hide details  
Reply
post #22 of 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taeric View Post
Don't quote me on the points/day until I check on what our dual core folders have been crunching, but something along those lines. And, again, it would only apply to folders who fold on a single quad and nothing else.

Yea, a quad with two instances, that would count, no? I just wanna go up the team ranks...the Team Competition cap is fine.

~Gooda~
Water Cooled Quad
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Q6600 Engineering Sample MSI P5N Diamond XFX Radeon 4850 4x2GB G.Skill DDR2-1000 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
640GB Boot - 2x 640GB Backup/Storage Lite-On DVD-R Windows 7 Professional x64 Samsung 245BW (24") 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
G15 Ultra X3 850W RocketFish (Lian-Li) by Cyberdruid Microsoft Wireless 6000 
  hide details  
Reply
Water Cooled Quad
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Q6600 Engineering Sample MSI P5N Diamond XFX Radeon 4850 4x2GB G.Skill DDR2-1000 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
640GB Boot - 2x 640GB Backup/Storage Lite-On DVD-R Windows 7 Professional x64 Samsung 245BW (24") 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
G15 Ultra X3 850W RocketFish (Lian-Li) by Cyberdruid Microsoft Wireless 6000 
  hide details  
Reply
post #23 of 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by boydyboyd View Post
cant you run 2 SMPs, fold one for 37726. and one for anonymous if you are really bothered about folding.
No, they are talking about sub teams in OCN (37726). You can still fold on all 4 cores for 37726 but in the folding competition with sub teams you can only fold with 2.
Mr. Windy
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Q9650 Asus Maximus II Formula EVGA GTX 460 8GB OCZ 800Mhz 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
2x300 V-Raptor, 2x1TB WD, 2xSegate 320GB Fedora 14 2x Samsung 245BW Corsair 750TX; APC BR1500 
Case
Soldam Windy Altium FC 700 
  hide details  
Reply
Mr. Windy
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Q9650 Asus Maximus II Formula EVGA GTX 460 8GB OCZ 800Mhz 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
2x300 V-Raptor, 2x1TB WD, 2xSegate 320GB Fedora 14 2x Samsung 245BW Corsair 750TX; APC BR1500 
Case
Soldam Windy Altium FC 700 
  hide details  
Reply
post #24 of 89
So if the points for quad cores get throttled back to the highest performing dual core in their team....that means that anyone with a quad core wants to make sure they get in a team with an E8400 or E8500 (best dual core FPUs) to maximize their score.
Server
(11 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardRAMHard Drive
Intel Core i5-3470 ASRock Z77 Extreme6 16 GB G.Skill Sniper DDR3-1600 1TB WD Caviar Black 
Hard DriveCoolingOSCase
4TB WD Caviar Red Cooler Master Hyper 212+ VMWare ESXi NZXT Crafted Series Tempest 410 
OtherOtherOther
LSI 9280-16i4e RAID Card Intel I350 Quad Port Gigabit NIC Intel Pro/1000 PT Dual Port Gigabit NIC 
  hide details  
Reply
Server
(11 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardRAMHard Drive
Intel Core i5-3470 ASRock Z77 Extreme6 16 GB G.Skill Sniper DDR3-1600 1TB WD Caviar Black 
Hard DriveCoolingOSCase
4TB WD Caviar Red Cooler Master Hyper 212+ VMWare ESXi NZXT Crafted Series Tempest 410 
OtherOtherOther
LSI 9280-16i4e RAID Card Intel I350 Quad Port Gigabit NIC Intel Pro/1000 PT Dual Port Gigabit NIC 
  hide details  
Reply
post #25 of 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manyak View Post
So if the points for quad cores get throttled back to the highest performing dual core in their team....that means that anyone with a quad core wants to make sure they get in a team with an E8400 or E8500 (best dual core FPUs) to maximize their score.
Exactly. And that would give OUR team an advantage. That's why I proposed simply halving the scores from a quad. Just to be fair. It's also easier to calculate. ~JadeMiner~
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E8600@4.5+GHz 24/7 Stable Asus P5Q Pro EVGA GTX 285 - 675/1728/1269 G.Skill 1066 2 Gigs 
Hard DriveOSPowerCase
Western Digital 320GB SATA2 7200rpm 16M Kubuntu Linux 64bit Raidmax 550W RaidMax Smilodon 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E8600@4.5+GHz 24/7 Stable Asus P5Q Pro EVGA GTX 285 - 675/1728/1269 G.Skill 1066 2 Gigs 
Hard DriveOSPowerCase
Western Digital 320GB SATA2 7200rpm 16M Kubuntu Linux 64bit Raidmax 550W RaidMax Smilodon 
  hide details  
Reply
post #26 of 89
Hah...if thats true, then I'm glad I got JadeMiner into my team a few months ago.

I think its the average score of all the dual cores...not positive. I guess we'll wait for an update from Taeric.

~Gooda~
Water Cooled Quad
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Q6600 Engineering Sample MSI P5N Diamond XFX Radeon 4850 4x2GB G.Skill DDR2-1000 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
640GB Boot - 2x 640GB Backup/Storage Lite-On DVD-R Windows 7 Professional x64 Samsung 245BW (24") 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
G15 Ultra X3 850W RocketFish (Lian-Li) by Cyberdruid Microsoft Wireless 6000 
  hide details  
Reply
Water Cooled Quad
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Q6600 Engineering Sample MSI P5N Diamond XFX Radeon 4850 4x2GB G.Skill DDR2-1000 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
640GB Boot - 2x 640GB Backup/Storage Lite-On DVD-R Windows 7 Professional x64 Samsung 245BW (24") 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
G15 Ultra X3 850W RocketFish (Lian-Li) by Cyberdruid Microsoft Wireless 6000 
  hide details  
Reply
post #27 of 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manyak View Post
So if the points for quad cores get throttled back to the highest performing dual core in their team....that means that anyone with a quad core wants to make sure they get in a team with an E8400 or E8500 (best dual core FPUs) to maximize their score.
It wouldn't be based team by team. There would be a flat maximum production rate across the board if we went that route. I really just need to look back at some data and see what we're dealing with.
Sig rig
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Q6600 G0 23A Asus P5K Deluxe Wifi HD 3870 2x2 GB G.Skill DDR2-800 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2x250 GB Seagate RAID 0 + 320 GB Seagate Samsung SATA DVD Windows XP Pro/Vista Ultimate 64 bit Viewsonic VA2012wb 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Saitek Eclipse Corsair HX620 Lian Li V2000b Logitech G7 
  hide details  
Reply
Sig rig
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Q6600 G0 23A Asus P5K Deluxe Wifi HD 3870 2x2 GB G.Skill DDR2-800 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2x250 GB Seagate RAID 0 + 320 GB Seagate Samsung SATA DVD Windows XP Pro/Vista Ultimate 64 bit Viewsonic VA2012wb 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Saitek Eclipse Corsair HX620 Lian Li V2000b Logitech G7 
  hide details  
Reply
post #28 of 89
Thread Starter 
First, it wouldn't benefit me personally, as I now have a farm with over 10 cores running. I think the idea in principal is good, though what Taeric proposes seems like a lot of mechanism, and I don't want to add even more work. The entire purpose was to simplify, though there's no right answer.

I would lean much more towards the halving points scheme.

What about if I am running ubuntu folding, and I change my id on one client to a team id? I've set my core affinities to 2 cores per client; would that be legally counted as two cores for me were I on a team?
Optimus Prime 95
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
q6600 (G0) @ 3.6; lapped EVGA 780i MSI 8800GT 512MB SLI 4x1GB Ballistix 8500 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
750Gb Samsung f1 Lite-On AIO Lightscribe Vista 64 Ultimate Sanyo PLV-Z4 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech Crapola Special 700W Rocketfish Antec 900 ULTIMATE, so you know it's serious... Logitech Crapola Special 
  hide details  
Reply
Optimus Prime 95
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
q6600 (G0) @ 3.6; lapped EVGA 780i MSI 8800GT 512MB SLI 4x1GB Ballistix 8500 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
750Gb Samsung f1 Lite-On AIO Lightscribe Vista 64 Ultimate Sanyo PLV-Z4 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech Crapola Special 700W Rocketfish Antec 900 ULTIMATE, so you know it's serious... Logitech Crapola Special 
  hide details  
Reply
post #29 of 89
If your two isolated cores were under your primary folding name then yes. If they were split off to a secondary folding name then no. Members with large core counts need to choose between the overall competition and the team competition.

I don't expect this would be too much effort on an ongoing basis on my part. There would be some setup time with modifying the spreadsheet, but I don't expect there would be much, if any, work after that.
Sig rig
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Q6600 G0 23A Asus P5K Deluxe Wifi HD 3870 2x2 GB G.Skill DDR2-800 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2x250 GB Seagate RAID 0 + 320 GB Seagate Samsung SATA DVD Windows XP Pro/Vista Ultimate 64 bit Viewsonic VA2012wb 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Saitek Eclipse Corsair HX620 Lian Li V2000b Logitech G7 
  hide details  
Reply
Sig rig
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Q6600 G0 23A Asus P5K Deluxe Wifi HD 3870 2x2 GB G.Skill DDR2-800 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2x250 GB Seagate RAID 0 + 320 GB Seagate Samsung SATA DVD Windows XP Pro/Vista Ultimate 64 bit Viewsonic VA2012wb 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Saitek Eclipse Corsair HX620 Lian Li V2000b Logitech G7 
  hide details  
Reply
post #30 of 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taeric View Post
If your two isolated cores were under your primary folding name then yes. If they were split off to a secondary folding name then no. Members with large core counts need to choose between the overall competition and the team competition.

I don't expect this would be too much effort on an ongoing basis on my part. There would be some setup time with modifying the spreadsheet, but I don't expect there would be much, if any, work after that.
When would this new quad ruling take effect? Next month? We are currently holding the quad on our team to 2 cores.
Also, do you have an ETA for last month's Folding Team results? I know you are busy, and I'd be happy to crunch any numbers needed. Thanks. ~JadeMiner~
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E8600@4.5+GHz 24/7 Stable Asus P5Q Pro EVGA GTX 285 - 675/1728/1269 G.Skill 1066 2 Gigs 
Hard DriveOSPowerCase
Western Digital 320GB SATA2 7200rpm 16M Kubuntu Linux 64bit Raidmax 550W RaidMax Smilodon 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E8600@4.5+GHz 24/7 Stable Asus P5Q Pro EVGA GTX 285 - 675/1728/1269 G.Skill 1066 2 Gigs 
Hard DriveOSPowerCase
Western Digital 320GB SATA2 7200rpm 16M Kubuntu Linux 64bit Raidmax 550W RaidMax Smilodon 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Original Folding Teams