Originally Posted by NuclearCrap
I have yet to understand why all those who believe global warming is fake can't even back up their claims with scientific proofs and that they all say it's due to the "natural" climate change without knowing the extent to which "natural" can change.
Most of all, it had mostly been Americans who called it fake, especially those who are linked to the oil industry. If it is fake, they could've proved it fake long time ago before some Washington editor was caught for censoring this so-called "conspiracy" and resigned to work for Exxon. On the other hand, almost all known scientists can tell you it's real.
Even if it is fake, I truly don't see what's wrong with conserving what we don't have much left of.
I've come to the conclusion that for every bit of evidence you show in support of man-made global warming, I can show a piece of evidence that speaks otherwise, and vice versa. So in that regard, it's kinda pointless to provide 'proof', because who the hell knows what's real and what's not? If a scientist is in the bag with Al Gore, he can manipulate his data accordingly, and again, vice versa.
I'm not saying we shouldnt conserve or control pollution; obviously we should. But all this global warming talk IMO is just blatant propaganda that does nothing but line the pockets of Al Gorians. It's become a business now. In that regard, I'm very much opposed to it.