New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Slow dual 2653? - Page 3

post #21 of 26
Thread Starter 
they were fine after the install on a single 2653 then went wonky after that when running 2.

I have cancelled both and downloaded a new 3062 on single instance.
post #22 of 26
Here is my 2653 bench for both of my machines here at the house. Each machine runs 2 instances
Dinosaur
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
L724A760 G0 Q6600 3.5 Ghz (438x8) @ 1.4375v ASUS P5K Premium 1001 EVGA GTX470 4GB G.Skill Pi 8800 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
WD 74GB Raptor (x2) + Maxtor 200GB (x2) DVD-ROM & DVD-RW Corsair H50 Windows7-64 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Dell 24" Widescreen Logitech G15 Corsair HX1000W TT Armor 
Mouse
Logitech G9 
  hide details  
Reply
Dinosaur
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
L724A760 G0 Q6600 3.5 Ghz (438x8) @ 1.4375v ASUS P5K Premium 1001 EVGA GTX470 4GB G.Skill Pi 8800 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
WD 74GB Raptor (x2) + Maxtor 200GB (x2) DVD-ROM & DVD-RW Corsair H50 Windows7-64 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Dell 24" Widescreen Logitech G15 Corsair HX1000W TT Armor 
Mouse
Logitech G9 
  hide details  
Reply
post #23 of 26
Thread Starter 
I found this post on the F@H forum

http://foldingforum.org/viewtopic.ph...sd=a&start=195

Quote:
My most recent experience, now that the 2653's are available again, is that 30xx's enjoyed a very marginal speed increase (a percentage point or two) under 5.92 but that the "new" 2653's take a 20% hit for some reason. I've just set up shortcuts, one for 2653 (so far) under 5.91 and one for everything else under 5.92. This is on AMD dual cores. I have no experience on Intel dual cores either way.

Anybody else notice anything with the very recent releases of 2653, or anything else for that matter?
Im finding the 5.92beta client and 2653 WUs seem about 20% slower than if you use 5.91FAH client
post #24 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by cognoscenti View Post
I found this post on the F@H forum



Im finding the 5.92 and 2653s seem about 20% slower than if you use 5.91
Not tried the 5.92 version yet, still on 5.91.
Mighty-iTX
(12 items)
 
One foot in..
(17 items)
 
mATX
(12 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-4770K M7-Impact Strix GTX980 Samsung 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Crucial M4 256 Glacer 240L W8.1 K272HUL 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Saitek Seasonic X-650 Prodigy MX518 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
4770K/45/43 Maximus VI Extreme R290X R290X 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Samsung Crucial M4 64GB RAIDR LSSWM 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
Cooler Master Glacer 7 Ultimate 64 SyncMaster Eclipse 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
XFX 1050 BE 600T Silver MX518 Desk 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5-4330 Z87 Gryphon GTX690 G.Skill RipJawsX 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
WD Blacks Hyper 212 W8.1 ACER 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech Ultra X3 1000w Corsair 230T Orange Razer 
  hide details  
Reply
Mighty-iTX
(12 items)
 
One foot in..
(17 items)
 
mATX
(12 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-4770K M7-Impact Strix GTX980 Samsung 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Crucial M4 256 Glacer 240L W8.1 K272HUL 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Saitek Seasonic X-650 Prodigy MX518 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
4770K/45/43 Maximus VI Extreme R290X R290X 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Samsung Crucial M4 64GB RAIDR LSSWM 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
Cooler Master Glacer 7 Ultimate 64 SyncMaster Eclipse 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
XFX 1050 BE 600T Silver MX518 Desk 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5-4330 Z87 Gryphon GTX690 G.Skill RipJawsX 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
WD Blacks Hyper 212 W8.1 ACER 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech Ultra X3 1000w Corsair 230T Orange Razer 
  hide details  
Reply
post #25 of 26
Thread Starter 
only reason i changed was to avoid the wireless disconnections corrupting WUs
post #26 of 26
yeah, i'm alittle hesitant on trying the 5.92. the 5.91 works fine for me, i figured i would give it some time, let them work all the kinks out of it. then see if there were any differences.
My Gaming System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 950 @ 4.0GHz @ 1.25v ASUS P6X58D-E GTX 580 Gskill 1600's 3x2 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
2x Corsair F120's in RAID0 Win 7 Ultimate 64bit Apple 30" 2560x1600 microsoft reclusa 
PowerCaseMouse
1000w Corsair antec 1200 razer diamondback 
  hide details  
Reply
My Gaming System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 950 @ 4.0GHz @ 1.25v ASUS P6X58D-E GTX 580 Gskill 1600's 3x2 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
2x Corsair F120's in RAID0 Win 7 Ultimate 64bit Apple 30" 2560x1600 microsoft reclusa 
PowerCaseMouse
1000w Corsair antec 1200 razer diamondback 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Overclock.net Folding@Home Team