post #11 of 11
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iconoclast View Post
Money. The costs to produce the ultra were far more expensive then the streamlined process involved in crafting the g92s en masse. I think they spent a **** load of time figuring out how to create the best gpu for the market and all that time spent at the drawing board probably pushed the price up as well... they succeeded though.



The ultra crushes all at any resolution. The gts is the more popular card because not everyone has an atm in their ass crack.

lol........thx all
Gaming
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Q9450 @ 3.6ghz Asus P5K PREMIUM Sapphire HD5970 + GTX260 physX 8GB BUFFALO FIRESTIX 8500 = 1150mhz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
seagate 160gb ide 160gb seagate sata dvdrom sata x64 W.7600 RTM 20" 1680x1050 & 23'' 2048x1 
PowerCaseMouse
XCILIO 850W coolermaster CM590 logitech NX80 
  hide details  
Reply
Gaming
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Q9450 @ 3.6ghz Asus P5K PREMIUM Sapphire HD5970 + GTX260 physX 8GB BUFFALO FIRESTIX 8500 = 1150mhz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
seagate 160gb ide 160gb seagate sata dvdrom sata x64 W.7600 RTM 20" 1680x1050 & 23'' 2048x1 
PowerCaseMouse
XCILIO 850W coolermaster CM590 logitech NX80 
  hide details  
Reply