Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › [Fud] Intel won't let Nvidia support Nehalem
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[Fud] Intel won't let Nvidia support Nehalem - Page 4

post #31 of 113
Yea, either way Nvidia lose. Although i think Intels methods are cheap and dirty, it is a very good business move.
Smallville
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel i5 3570k Asus Sabertooth Z77 Asus HD7950 DirectCU II Asus HD7950 DirectCU II 
RAMHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
8GB DDR3 Corsair Vengeance 1600Mhz 128GB Corsair Force Pro, 2 x 2TB HDD, 500GB Ext... LG Blu-Ray, DVD/CD RW drive Corsair H60 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 8.1 Pro 64-bit Genuine 27" Crossover 27Q S-IPS 1440p Cyborg V7 Corsair HX1000 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
NZXT Phantom White Microsoft Sidewinder X8 Wireless Steelseries QcK Sennheiser eH250 
  hide details  
Reply
Smallville
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel i5 3570k Asus Sabertooth Z77 Asus HD7950 DirectCU II Asus HD7950 DirectCU II 
RAMHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
8GB DDR3 Corsair Vengeance 1600Mhz 128GB Corsair Force Pro, 2 x 2TB HDD, 500GB Ext... LG Blu-Ray, DVD/CD RW drive Corsair H60 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 8.1 Pro 64-bit Genuine 27" Crossover 27Q S-IPS 1440p Cyborg V7 Corsair HX1000 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
NZXT Phantom White Microsoft Sidewinder X8 Wireless Steelseries QcK Sennheiser eH250 
  hide details  
Reply
post #32 of 113
Quote:
Originally Posted by QuickS View Post
Well I know for me it wont make in difference in any of my choices as Nvidia chipsets generally overclock poorly unless you are willing to spend $300+ on the top of the line version. If I really needed sli i would probably just get a dual card or not get sli at all (sli is a waste of money IMHO).
i paid 200 for my evga 680i a1 and it overclocks my old C2D and my C2Q just fine..... and SLi is a waste of money ??

Do you usually just post some random stuff you heard on a diff thread ? or what ?

SLi scales just fine for me and many others.. but thanks for telling everyone with SLi they are basically morons and wasted their money... well played
My900
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Q6600 @ 3.4 GHz evga nForce 680i A1 LeadTek GTX 280 @ 705/1450/1200 4x1GB Super Tallent DDR2(800) 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Seagate 250gbx2 LG 18X DVD-RW / 300GB WD VelociRaptor Vista x64 Samsung 245BW 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech ThermalTake Toughpower 650w Antec 900 Logitech 
Mouse Pad
Logitech 
  hide details  
Reply
My900
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Q6600 @ 3.4 GHz evga nForce 680i A1 LeadTek GTX 280 @ 705/1450/1200 4x1GB Super Tallent DDR2(800) 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Seagate 250gbx2 LG 18X DVD-RW / 300GB WD VelociRaptor Vista x64 Samsung 245BW 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech ThermalTake Toughpower 650w Antec 900 Logitech 
Mouse Pad
Logitech 
  hide details  
Reply
post #33 of 113
I said that months ago.

Intel is going to poker high.
The result will be:
- nVidia Chipsets for Nehalem
- SLI on Intel Chipsets

I'm not gone repost all the details, rumors and stuff here again but it is very likely to be so...
Compu15
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Xeon X3230 @ 3200 abit AB9 Quad GT Club3D HD4870 1024 OC 8GB - (2x G.Skill DDR2 F2-6400CL5D-4GBPQ) 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2x [WD Raptor 74GB] + 2x [Samsung 640GB] Samsung SH-S183A Windows Vista Business 64 2x Benq FP71E 17" 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Noname (<10€) + Sharkoon Rush Pad Cooler Master iGreen 600W Cooler Master Centurion 534 (black + window) Logitech MX518 
Mouse Pad
Sharkoon 1337 Gaming Mat 
  hide details  
Reply
Compu15
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Xeon X3230 @ 3200 abit AB9 Quad GT Club3D HD4870 1024 OC 8GB - (2x G.Skill DDR2 F2-6400CL5D-4GBPQ) 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2x [WD Raptor 74GB] + 2x [Samsung 640GB] Samsung SH-S183A Windows Vista Business 64 2x Benq FP71E 17" 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Noname (<10€) + Sharkoon Rush Pad Cooler Master iGreen 600W Cooler Master Centurion 534 (black + window) Logitech MX518 
Mouse Pad
Sharkoon 1337 Gaming Mat 
  hide details  
Reply
post #34 of 113
i think what would happen is nvidia pwning intel with new gcpu processors, oversized tegras ftw.
Standard
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i4670k Asus Z87-PRO Gigabyte Windforce HD7950 Corsair Vengeance Pro 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
128GB SSD 1 TB Samsung 7200rpm LG 22X DVD Burner Coolermaster Hyper 212 EVO 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 7 Home Premium 64 Bit AOC LED and HP LCD Leopold 200FCR Black OCZ ModXStream Pro OCZ600MXSP 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
Rosewill Blackbone Kinzu Steelseries QCK Xonar DX with Superlux HD 681 EVO 
  hide details  
Reply
Standard
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i4670k Asus Z87-PRO Gigabyte Windforce HD7950 Corsair Vengeance Pro 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
128GB SSD 1 TB Samsung 7200rpm LG 22X DVD Burner Coolermaster Hyper 212 EVO 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 7 Home Premium 64 Bit AOC LED and HP LCD Leopold 200FCR Black OCZ ModXStream Pro OCZ600MXSP 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
Rosewill Blackbone Kinzu Steelseries QCK Xonar DX with Superlux HD 681 EVO 
  hide details  
Reply
post #35 of 113
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by IcedEarth View Post
Yea, either way Nvidia lose. Although i think Intels methods are cheap and dirty, it is a very good business move.
I agree with you about Intel, but you can almost say the same for Nvidia and their TWIMTBP program.

Quote:
Originally Posted by psik0.k1m
SLi scales just fine for me and many others.. but thanks for telling everyone with SLi they are basically morons and wasted their money... well played
To be fair, he did state that it was in his opinion that SLI is a waste of money, and didn't appear to be attacking SLI-users for using it.
post #36 of 113
Why would Intel want to kill Nvidia? That just leaves the market wide open for ati (and AMD) which makes more money for ati (amd) and allows AMD to compete with intel.
____
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Q6700 Asus P5K-E/WIFI XFX 8800GTS 512MB 2x1 OCZ Reaper DDR2-800 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
WD6401AALS w7 rc LG 22" 1680x1050 Corsair TX650 
Case
TT Armor 
  hide details  
Reply
____
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Q6700 Asus P5K-E/WIFI XFX 8800GTS 512MB 2x1 OCZ Reaper DDR2-800 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
WD6401AALS w7 rc LG 22" 1680x1050 Corsair TX650 
Case
TT Armor 
  hide details  
Reply
post #37 of 113
Quote:
Originally Posted by john55576 View Post
How hard would it be for nvidia to say make their own CPU or a GPU that acts like a CPU?
1. Impossible. Nvidia would need a x86 license from Intel. If they can't get permission to make a chipset I doubt they are getting a x86 license any time soon.

2. Intel's biggest technology is not in their actually processor technology but rather their manufacturing technology. Intel can make a lot of CPUs at very high yield rates for very cheap. This is very important and takes a lot of money to develop.

The actual development of the CPU probably wouldn't be as difficult as the above 2. Not that it would be a competition with Intel / AMD.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlphaDog11790 View Post
Why would Intel want to kill Nvidia? That just leaves the market wide open for ati (and AMD) which makes more money for ati (amd) and allows AMD to compete with intel.
They don't want to kill them. They are just putting them in their place.
System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7 2500k ASRock P67 Extreme4 Gen 3 AMD 7970 16GB DDR3 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Intel 520 256GB SATA DVD Burner Windows 7 64 bit Deal U2410 
KeyboardPowerMouse
Adesso Mechanical Silverstone OP650 Logitech G700 
  hide details  
Reply
System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7 2500k ASRock P67 Extreme4 Gen 3 AMD 7970 16GB DDR3 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Intel 520 256GB SATA DVD Burner Windows 7 64 bit Deal U2410 
KeyboardPowerMouse
Adesso Mechanical Silverstone OP650 Logitech G700 
  hide details  
Reply
post #38 of 113
Nvidia is a proud company and doesn't want anyone else to use there technology.
Delta Zero
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
R7 1700 @ 3.9ghz Gigabyte X370 Gaming K3 Asus Strix 580 @ 1500/9000 (2x8) 16GB @ 2933mhz 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Crucial M4 128GB + Intel 535 480GB +3TB WD Blue  Noctua NH-U12S SE Windows 10 Pro 64bit AOC G2460PF 144Hz Freesync 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Razer Black Widow Ultimate  Corsair CS650M Corsair Obsidian 450D Logitech G9X 
  hide details  
Reply
Delta Zero
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
R7 1700 @ 3.9ghz Gigabyte X370 Gaming K3 Asus Strix 580 @ 1500/9000 (2x8) 16GB @ 2933mhz 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Crucial M4 128GB + Intel 535 480GB +3TB WD Blue  Noctua NH-U12S SE Windows 10 Pro 64bit AOC G2460PF 144Hz Freesync 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Razer Black Widow Ultimate  Corsair CS650M Corsair Obsidian 450D Logitech G9X 
  hide details  
Reply
post #39 of 113
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlphaDog11790 View Post
Why would Intel want to kill Nvidia? That just leaves the market wide open for ati (and AMD) which makes more money for ati (amd) and allows AMD to compete with intel.
They don't want Nvidia to go out of business, they want to stop (or slow) their branching out into other markets with the whole CUDA thing and GPU accelerated tasks. When they do this, they compete directly with Intel because using GPU acceleration for certain things reduces the processor requirement. If people aren't buying faster processors, Intel loses money.
post #40 of 113
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrueForm View Post
Nvidia is a proud company and doesn't want anyone else to use there technology.
Hah lol

So thinking your way why should Intel let anyone use their tech?

nVidia just fears that they lose a USP for their Chipsets.
And if Intel Chipsets have SLI support they really have to make good chipsets.
Not the overheating slow ones they do these days ;o)
Edited by MESeidel - 6/4/08 at 4:40pm
Compu15
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Xeon X3230 @ 3200 abit AB9 Quad GT Club3D HD4870 1024 OC 8GB - (2x G.Skill DDR2 F2-6400CL5D-4GBPQ) 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2x [WD Raptor 74GB] + 2x [Samsung 640GB] Samsung SH-S183A Windows Vista Business 64 2x Benq FP71E 17" 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Noname (<10€) + Sharkoon Rush Pad Cooler Master iGreen 600W Cooler Master Centurion 534 (black + window) Logitech MX518 
Mouse Pad
Sharkoon 1337 Gaming Mat 
  hide details  
Reply
Compu15
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Xeon X3230 @ 3200 abit AB9 Quad GT Club3D HD4870 1024 OC 8GB - (2x G.Skill DDR2 F2-6400CL5D-4GBPQ) 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2x [WD Raptor 74GB] + 2x [Samsung 640GB] Samsung SH-S183A Windows Vista Business 64 2x Benq FP71E 17" 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Noname (<10€) + Sharkoon Rush Pad Cooler Master iGreen 600W Cooler Master Centurion 534 (black + window) Logitech MX518 
Mouse Pad
Sharkoon 1337 Gaming Mat 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Hardware News
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › [Fud] Intel won't let Nvidia support Nehalem