Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › [Fud] Intel won't let Nvidia support Nehalem
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[Fud] Intel won't let Nvidia support Nehalem - Page 10

post #91 of 113
Well, Nehalem should be Intel-exclusive IMO. But either way, Nvidia gets a big pounding.
Little Machine
(18 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-4790k ASUS Z97-A/USB3.1 EVGA GTX 950 SSC 16GB (2x8GB) G.Skill RipjawsX DDR3 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
16GB (2x8GB) Corsair Vengeance DDR3 Samsung 850 EVO SSD Intel DC P3605 NVMe SSD Western Digital Green HDD 
Optical DriveCoolingOSMonitor
iHAS 324B Cooler Master V6 GT Windows 10 ASUS VE278Q 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G710+ Antec TruePower Quattro 850W CM Storm Scout Logitech G402 
Mouse Pad
Saitek Cyborg V.5 
  hide details  
Reply
Little Machine
(18 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-4790k ASUS Z97-A/USB3.1 EVGA GTX 950 SSC 16GB (2x8GB) G.Skill RipjawsX DDR3 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
16GB (2x8GB) Corsair Vengeance DDR3 Samsung 850 EVO SSD Intel DC P3605 NVMe SSD Western Digital Green HDD 
Optical DriveCoolingOSMonitor
iHAS 324B Cooler Master V6 GT Windows 10 ASUS VE278Q 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G710+ Antec TruePower Quattro 850W CM Storm Scout Logitech G402 
Mouse Pad
Saitek Cyborg V.5 
  hide details  
Reply
post #92 of 113
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaiDer View Post
If AMD comes up with a chip capable of matching Intel in the near future, then imo Intel will get a serious wake up call.
And if pigs started to fly we might have to watch out for in-flight bacon processors, 747-style. Jokes aside, AMD needs a wake up call of their own. In the form of being restructured. Or at least, bought out by Sun.
post #93 of 113
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guswut View Post
And if pigs started to fly we might have to watch out for in-flight bacon processors, 747-style. Jokes aside, AMD needs a wake up call of their own. In the form of being restructured. Or at least, bought out by Sun.

AMD is in a better position than nvidia right now.
Magicbox
(17 items)
 
crapbox
(13 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
FX 8320 Sabertooth 990FX Nitro+ RX480 Kingston HyperX Fury 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Samsung 850 EVO  Kingston HyperX 3K Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 Noctua NH-D15 
OSOSMonitorKeyboard
Kubuntu  Windows 10 Pro Dell U2515H CM Quickfire TK (Cherry Blue) 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Cooler Master Silent Pro M 850W Enthoo Pro Logitech G502 Logitech G440 
Audio
Xonar DX 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Sempron 3300+ HP stock mobo (laptop) 200M (IGP) 2x1GB PC3200 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
100GB ATA133 DVD/CDRW Kubuntu 32 bit 14.1" (1280x768) 
Power
6 cell 
  hide details  
Reply
Magicbox
(17 items)
 
crapbox
(13 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
FX 8320 Sabertooth 990FX Nitro+ RX480 Kingston HyperX Fury 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Samsung 850 EVO  Kingston HyperX 3K Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 Noctua NH-D15 
OSOSMonitorKeyboard
Kubuntu  Windows 10 Pro Dell U2515H CM Quickfire TK (Cherry Blue) 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Cooler Master Silent Pro M 850W Enthoo Pro Logitech G502 Logitech G440 
Audio
Xonar DX 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Sempron 3300+ HP stock mobo (laptop) 200M (IGP) 2x1GB PC3200 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
100GB ATA133 DVD/CDRW Kubuntu 32 bit 14.1" (1280x768) 
Power
6 cell 
  hide details  
Reply
post #94 of 113
Quote:
Originally Posted by Melcar View Post
AMD is in a better position than nvidia right now.
false
Compu15
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Xeon X3230 @ 3200 abit AB9 Quad GT Club3D HD4870 1024 OC 8GB - (2x G.Skill DDR2 F2-6400CL5D-4GBPQ) 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2x [WD Raptor 74GB] + 2x [Samsung 640GB] Samsung SH-S183A Windows Vista Business 64 2x Benq FP71E 17" 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Noname (<10€) + Sharkoon Rush Pad Cooler Master iGreen 600W Cooler Master Centurion 534 (black + window) Logitech MX518 
Mouse Pad
Sharkoon 1337 Gaming Mat 
  hide details  
Reply
Compu15
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Xeon X3230 @ 3200 abit AB9 Quad GT Club3D HD4870 1024 OC 8GB - (2x G.Skill DDR2 F2-6400CL5D-4GBPQ) 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2x [WD Raptor 74GB] + 2x [Samsung 640GB] Samsung SH-S183A Windows Vista Business 64 2x Benq FP71E 17" 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Noname (<10€) + Sharkoon Rush Pad Cooler Master iGreen 600W Cooler Master Centurion 534 (black + window) Logitech MX518 
Mouse Pad
Sharkoon 1337 Gaming Mat 
  hide details  
Reply
post #95 of 113
Quote:
Originally Posted by MESeidel View Post
false
How do you figure? They have two major product lines which are viable sources of income (CPU and GPU) and business relations with the single largest chipmaker in the industry - I'd say thats far cry from Nvidia, who has one viable major product line (the GPU) and poor to no current relations with that same large chipmaker.
Morpheus Mini
(7 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-6700T SN970 GTX 960 Crucial CT102464BF160B 
Hard DriveOSAudio
Samsung 850 Evo M.2 Windows 10 Pro MOTU Audio Express 
  hide details  
Reply
Morpheus Mini
(7 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-6700T SN970 GTX 960 Crucial CT102464BF160B 
Hard DriveOSAudio
Samsung 850 Evo M.2 Windows 10 Pro MOTU Audio Express 
  hide details  
Reply
post #96 of 113
Quote:
Originally Posted by MESeidel View Post
false
true, if you can only get top performance out of a nehalem system with AMD graphics cards, anyone going for top performance will have AMD cards.
post #97 of 113
Quote:
Originally Posted by MESeidel View Post
false
Ahh, no. While it may seem that AMD is hurting, they have much more potential for the future. Having chipset, CPU and GFX options that are good and getting better, I don't see how they are in a worse position.
Current
(3 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphics
i5 6600k MSI Z170-A Pro RX-480 
  hide details  
Reply
Current
(3 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphics
i5 6600k MSI Z170-A Pro RX-480 
  hide details  
Reply
post #98 of 113
NVIDIA is consistently profitable, while AMD has been loosing money pretty consitently for a while.
Primary
(15 items)
 
Secondary
(13 items)
 
In progress
(10 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
5820K @ 4.3/3.6GHz core/uncore, 1.225/1.2v Gigabyte X99 SOC Champion (F22n) 2x Sapphire R9 290X Tri-X OC New Edition (10036... 4x4GiB Crucial @ 2667, 12-11-12-27-T1, 1.37v 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Plextor M6e 128GB (fw 1.05) M.2 (PCI-E 2.0 2x) 2x Crucial M4 256GB 4x WD Scorpio Black 500GB Cooler Master Nepton 280L 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 7 Professional x64 SP1 BenQ BL3200PT Filco Majestouch Tenkeyless (MX Brown) Corsair RM1000x 
CaseMouseAudio
Fractal Design Define R4 Logitech G402 Realtek ALC1150 + M-Audio AV40 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
X5670 @ 4.4/3.2GHz core/uncore, 1.36 vcore, 1.2... Gigabyte X58A-UD5 r2.0 w/FF3mod10 BIOS Reference R9 290X w/Stilt's MLU 1000e / 1375m E... 2x Samsung MV-3V4G3D/US @ 2000, 10-11-11-30-T1,... 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
1x Crucial BLT4G3D1608ET3LX0 @ 2000, 10-11-11-3... OCZ (Toshiba) Trion 150 120GB Hyundai Sapphire 120GB 3x Hitachi Deskstar 7k1000.C 1TB 
CoolingOSPowerCase
Noctua NH-D14 Windows 7 Pro x64 SP1 Antec TP-750 Fractal Design R5 
Audio
ASUS Xonar DS 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-6800K @ 4.3/3.5GHz core/uncore, 1.36/1.2v ASRock X99 OC Formula (P3.10) GTX 780 (temporary) 4x4GiB Crucial DDR4-2400 @ 11-13-12-28-T2, 1.33v 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Intel 600p 256GB NVMe 2x HGST Travelstar 7k1000 1TB Corsair H55 (temporary) Windows Server 2016 Datacenter 
PowerCase
Seasonic SS-860XP2 Corsair Carbide Air 540 
  hide details  
Reply
Primary
(15 items)
 
Secondary
(13 items)
 
In progress
(10 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
5820K @ 4.3/3.6GHz core/uncore, 1.225/1.2v Gigabyte X99 SOC Champion (F22n) 2x Sapphire R9 290X Tri-X OC New Edition (10036... 4x4GiB Crucial @ 2667, 12-11-12-27-T1, 1.37v 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Plextor M6e 128GB (fw 1.05) M.2 (PCI-E 2.0 2x) 2x Crucial M4 256GB 4x WD Scorpio Black 500GB Cooler Master Nepton 280L 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 7 Professional x64 SP1 BenQ BL3200PT Filco Majestouch Tenkeyless (MX Brown) Corsair RM1000x 
CaseMouseAudio
Fractal Design Define R4 Logitech G402 Realtek ALC1150 + M-Audio AV40 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
X5670 @ 4.4/3.2GHz core/uncore, 1.36 vcore, 1.2... Gigabyte X58A-UD5 r2.0 w/FF3mod10 BIOS Reference R9 290X w/Stilt's MLU 1000e / 1375m E... 2x Samsung MV-3V4G3D/US @ 2000, 10-11-11-30-T1,... 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
1x Crucial BLT4G3D1608ET3LX0 @ 2000, 10-11-11-3... OCZ (Toshiba) Trion 150 120GB Hyundai Sapphire 120GB 3x Hitachi Deskstar 7k1000.C 1TB 
CoolingOSPowerCase
Noctua NH-D14 Windows 7 Pro x64 SP1 Antec TP-750 Fractal Design R5 
Audio
ASUS Xonar DS 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-6800K @ 4.3/3.5GHz core/uncore, 1.36/1.2v ASRock X99 OC Formula (P3.10) GTX 780 (temporary) 4x4GiB Crucial DDR4-2400 @ 11-13-12-28-T2, 1.33v 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Intel 600p 256GB NVMe 2x HGST Travelstar 7k1000 1TB Corsair H55 (temporary) Windows Server 2016 Datacenter 
PowerCase
Seasonic SS-860XP2 Corsair Carbide Air 540 
  hide details  
Reply
post #99 of 113
I think this is tit for tat. Nvidia won't let Intel support SLI without coughing up a license while Intel has been leaving their platform open for others to support without one. This has been Nvidia's primary way of making their stake in the market. But it isn't fair. ATI/AMD were smart to open Crossfire; essentially being as open as Intel. But Nvidia hasn't played the game that way, and now Intel is basically saying their going to do what Nvidia has been doing to them. Now that Intel has a bargaining chip even greater than Nvidia's, perhaps this will mean SLI for X58 and Nehalem for Nforce. Competition is good.

Rob
Endor-IV
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
QX 9650 9x400 @ stock volts 1.25v Gigabyte EX38-DS4 Sapphire 4870 Toxic 1GB 2x2GB Corsair Dominator PC2-8500 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
1TB Seagate Barracuda 12 (7200.12) LG GSA-H42L Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit Samsung 2493HM 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Razer/Microsoft Reclusa Huntkey F1 620W Huntkey H001 Razer Lachesis 
Mouse Pad
Desktop 
  hide details  
Reply
Endor-IV
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
QX 9650 9x400 @ stock volts 1.25v Gigabyte EX38-DS4 Sapphire 4870 Toxic 1GB 2x2GB Corsair Dominator PC2-8500 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
1TB Seagate Barracuda 12 (7200.12) LG GSA-H42L Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit Samsung 2493HM 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Razer/Microsoft Reclusa Huntkey F1 620W Huntkey H001 Razer Lachesis 
Mouse Pad
Desktop 
  hide details  
Reply
post #100 of 113
Quote:
Originally Posted by psik0.k1m View Post
i paid 200 for my evga 680i a1 and it overclocks my old C2D and my C2Q just fine..... and SLi is a waste of money ??

Do you usually just post some random stuff you heard on a diff thread ? or what ?

SLi scales just fine for me and many others.. but thanks for telling everyone with SLi they are basically morons and wasted their money... well played
I had quite a run with the 680i boards. While it's great that yours is a good performer, the 680i in general has to be the most abysmal motherboard chipset of its generation. I think many folks have thanked the stars that a lot of Nvidia partners have a fast, easy, and understanding RMA process. High failure rates, hot chipsets, and (in general) finicky Quad overclockability made my jump to Intel an easy one. For the record, I owned an Asus P5N32E-SLI (couldn't overclock with immature BIOS), a few EVGA 680i's (all but one dead), and not one but two EVGA 780i's (one died - the other sold off).

Quote:
Originally Posted by binormalkilla View Post
If you think that only one game justifies a dual GPU solution, then you clearly haven't played any games at 1920x1XXX and up resolutions.
I agree 100% with this. I game at 1920x1200 and with many of the games I play, I simply couldn't turn all the candy on with a single 8800GTX; plain and simple. I bought a second and ran them in SLi for some time and to me it made all the difference on the world. With the exception of Crysis, there was no game that could best my GTXs.

Nvidia has one thing really going for them as I write this: the fact their cards are pound-for-pound, dollar-for-dollar, are better than the competition (these days even that is arguable).

ATi recently has made a lot of progress though and have been firing shots over the Nvidia bow with their HD4X series so close. I finally switched to my x2 because I found Intel to be the better chipset manufacturer and Crossfire to be the more viable option since I can add a $130 3870, a $360 3870x2, or just leave it alone.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Hardware News
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › [Fud] Intel won't let Nvidia support Nehalem