Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Hard Drives & Storage › Unhappy with RAID 1 Performance...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Unhappy with RAID 1 Performance...

post #1 of 23
Thread Starter 
When I had built my sigrig, I had it configured to RAID-0, which was very nice. Super fast, and everything ran super smooth.

My computer has since crashed and I didn't have a backup data drive, or backup RAID-1 config., so I was upset with myself and reformatted with a RAID-1 config., and an additional data drive.

I have my two Seagate 7200.10 320's in the RAID, and performance is noticably slower. Most noticably on bootup, shutdown, moving large amounts of files... This freaking sucks! If the computer restarts unexpectated or I lose power, on the way up, Windows always takes forever to boot because it does a checkdisk on the HD and verifies the data on each drive.

Am I doing something wrong? or is this just the consequence of having a RAID 1 setup (aka SLOW as $#!@)

Note: I am not sure if I installed the Intel Matrix thing for RAID configs.
Paradise
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II X6 1055T @ 3.7ghz Gigabyte GA-890GPA-UD3H XFX 5770 Crossfire 4x2GB G.Skill Ripjaws DDR3 1600 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
64GB MC SSD, 2x320 7200.10, 2x2TB Green Caviar Windows 7 Ultimate Samsung 205BW & 32" Panasonic LCD G15 
PowerCaseMouse
Corsair HX620 (FTW) CoolerMaster HAF 932 MX518 
  hide details  
Reply
Paradise
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II X6 1055T @ 3.7ghz Gigabyte GA-890GPA-UD3H XFX 5770 Crossfire 4x2GB G.Skill Ripjaws DDR3 1600 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
64GB MC SSD, 2x320 7200.10, 2x2TB Green Caviar Windows 7 Ultimate Samsung 205BW & 32" Panasonic LCD G15 
PowerCaseMouse
Corsair HX620 (FTW) CoolerMaster HAF 932 MX518 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2 of 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeaceMaker View Post
When I had built my sigrig, I had it configured to RAID-0, which was very nice. Super fast, and everything ran super smooth.

My computer has since crashed and I didn't have a backup data drive, or backup RAID-1 config., so I was upset with myself and reformatted with a RAID-1 config., and an additional data drive.

I have my two Seagate 7200.10 320's in the RAID, and performance is noticably slower. Most noticably on bootup, shutdown, moving large amounts of files... This freaking sucks! If the computer restarts unexpectated or I lose power, on the way up, Windows always takes forever to boot because it does a checkdisk on the HD and verifies the data on each drive.

Am I doing something wrong? or is this just the consequence of having a RAID 1 setup (aka SLOW as $#!@)

Note: I am not sure if I installed the Intel Matrix thing for RAID configs.
RAID 1 doesn't really offer any speed benefits. The advantage comes with redundancy. Compared to RAID 0, RAID 1 should be slower.
00LANBox
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II X3 720 ASUS M4A785TD-M EVO Sapp 4870 1GB Mushkin Silverline DDR3 1333 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
2x Spinpoint F3 1GB RAID 0 Windows 7 Pro x64 Acer AL2016WBbd OCZ ModXStream Pro 500W 
Case
Da Box 100 Blackheart 
  hide details  
Reply
00LANBox
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II X3 720 ASUS M4A785TD-M EVO Sapp 4870 1GB Mushkin Silverline DDR3 1333 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
2x Spinpoint F3 1GB RAID 0 Windows 7 Pro x64 Acer AL2016WBbd OCZ ModXStream Pro 500W 
Case
Da Box 100 Blackheart 
  hide details  
Reply
post #3 of 23
Try Raid 0+1. It combines both elements. You need 4 of the same hard drives though.
post #4 of 23
Normal. I think.
Optimus Prime
(16 items)
 
Server
(12 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel E8200 ASUS 650i EVGA 8800 GTS 512MB 8GB Corsair 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Assorted HDDs None Stock Server 2008 R2 
MonitorPowerCase
Dell 19" corsair 400w Old OEM case 
  hide details  
Reply
Optimus Prime
(16 items)
 
Server
(12 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel E8200 ASUS 650i EVGA 8800 GTS 512MB 8GB Corsair 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Assorted HDDs None Stock Server 2008 R2 
MonitorPowerCase
Dell 19" corsair 400w Old OEM case 
  hide details  
Reply
post #5 of 23
Throw up some benchmarks.

RAID1 should perform nearly the same as just one HD.
Once again...
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 920 [4.28GHz, HT] Asus P6T + Broadcom NetXtreme II VisionTek HD5850 [900/1200] + Galaxy GT240 2x4GB G.Skill Ripjaw X [1632 MHz] 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Intel X25-M 160GB + 3xRAID0 500GB 7200.12 Window 7 Pro 64 Acer H243H + Samsung 226BW XARMOR-U9BL  
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Antec Truepower New 750W Li Lian PC-V2100 [10x120mm fans] Logitech G9 X-Trac Pro 
  hide details  
Reply
Once again...
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 920 [4.28GHz, HT] Asus P6T + Broadcom NetXtreme II VisionTek HD5850 [900/1200] + Galaxy GT240 2x4GB G.Skill Ripjaw X [1632 MHz] 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Intel X25-M 160GB + 3xRAID0 500GB 7200.12 Window 7 Pro 64 Acer H243H + Samsung 226BW XARMOR-U9BL  
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Antec Truepower New 750W Li Lian PC-V2100 [10x120mm fans] Logitech G9 X-Trac Pro 
  hide details  
Reply
post #6 of 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by Refresh View Post
Try Raid 0+1. It combines both elements. You need 4 of the same hard drives though.
Agreed. But don't you mean 3 drives?
Lucky 7
(13 items)
 
TJ07 Type R
(12 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i9 7900X @ 4.70Ghz 1.2v MSI X299 Gaming Pro Carbon 2 x eVGA Nvidia GTX1080Ti SC2 SLI  32GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3000Mhz 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
2 x Sandisk UltraII 1TB SSD (RAID 0) Custom Water w/ EK XE360 & EK XRES 140 D5 & EK ... Windows 10 Pro Acer Predator XB271HU 165Hz 1440p 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Razer Blackwidow Chroma V2 eVGA SuperNova T2 1600w w/Sleeved cables Modded Corsair 750D Razer Deathadder Elite 
Audio
Creative Soundblaster ZxR 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 950 @ 4.2Ghz ASUS Rampage III Extreme (EK Full Coverage Block) 2 x ASUS GTX480's (EK Full Cover blocks / Black... 12GB Corsair Dominator GT 1866Mhz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
2 x 128GB Crucial C300 SSD (RAID 0) & Samsung F... Pioneer DVR215D Heatkiller 3.0 Full Copper / Black Ice 360GTS Windows 7 Pro 
MonitorPowerCaseAudio
3 x Samsung P2450's Corsair HX1000 (Sleeved Red) Modded TJ07 ASUS Xonar STX 
  hide details  
Reply
Lucky 7
(13 items)
 
TJ07 Type R
(12 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i9 7900X @ 4.70Ghz 1.2v MSI X299 Gaming Pro Carbon 2 x eVGA Nvidia GTX1080Ti SC2 SLI  32GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3000Mhz 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
2 x Sandisk UltraII 1TB SSD (RAID 0) Custom Water w/ EK XE360 & EK XRES 140 D5 & EK ... Windows 10 Pro Acer Predator XB271HU 165Hz 1440p 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Razer Blackwidow Chroma V2 eVGA SuperNova T2 1600w w/Sleeved cables Modded Corsair 750D Razer Deathadder Elite 
Audio
Creative Soundblaster ZxR 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 950 @ 4.2Ghz ASUS Rampage III Extreme (EK Full Coverage Block) 2 x ASUS GTX480's (EK Full Cover blocks / Black... 12GB Corsair Dominator GT 1866Mhz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
2 x 128GB Crucial C300 SSD (RAID 0) & Samsung F... Pioneer DVR215D Heatkiller 3.0 Full Copper / Black Ice 360GTS Windows 7 Pro 
MonitorPowerCaseAudio
3 x Samsung P2450's Corsair HX1000 (Sleeved Red) Modded TJ07 ASUS Xonar STX 
  hide details  
Reply
post #7 of 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Rocker View Post
Agreed. But don't you mean 3 drives?
Im not sure. Don't 2 of the drives run in Raid 1 and the other 2 in Raid 0?

Quote:
RAID 0+1: striped sets in a mirrored set (minimum four disks; even number of disks) provides fault tolerance and improved performance but increases complexity. The key difference from RAID 1+0 is that RAID 0+1 creates a second striped set to mirror a primary striped set. The array continues to operate with one or more drives failed in the same mirror set, but if drives fail on both sides of the mirror the data on the RAID system is lost.
post #8 of 23
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Refresh View Post
Im not sure. Don't 2 of the drives run in Raid 1 and the other 2 in Raid 0?
this is correct. I would have had to purchase another 320gb hd. but i feel like that is a waste to have 4x320gb HD's and only have 320GB capacity...
Paradise
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II X6 1055T @ 3.7ghz Gigabyte GA-890GPA-UD3H XFX 5770 Crossfire 4x2GB G.Skill Ripjaws DDR3 1600 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
64GB MC SSD, 2x320 7200.10, 2x2TB Green Caviar Windows 7 Ultimate Samsung 205BW & 32" Panasonic LCD G15 
PowerCaseMouse
Corsair HX620 (FTW) CoolerMaster HAF 932 MX518 
  hide details  
Reply
Paradise
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II X6 1055T @ 3.7ghz Gigabyte GA-890GPA-UD3H XFX 5770 Crossfire 4x2GB G.Skill Ripjaws DDR3 1600 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
64GB MC SSD, 2x320 7200.10, 2x2TB Green Caviar Windows 7 Ultimate Samsung 205BW & 32" Panasonic LCD G15 
PowerCaseMouse
Corsair HX620 (FTW) CoolerMaster HAF 932 MX518 
  hide details  
Reply
post #9 of 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Rocker View Post
Agreed. But don't you mean 3 drives?
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeaceMaker View Post
this is correct. I would have had to purchase another 320gb hd. but i feel like that is a waste to have 4x320gb HD's and only have 320GB capacity...
Wrong....

RAID0+1,10 requires: 4+ drivers (even number only) and you get N/2 usable space.
RAID5 requires: 3+ drives and you get N-1 usable space.


Again... PLEASE SHOW US SOME BENCHMARKS.
Once again...
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 920 [4.28GHz, HT] Asus P6T + Broadcom NetXtreme II VisionTek HD5850 [900/1200] + Galaxy GT240 2x4GB G.Skill Ripjaw X [1632 MHz] 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Intel X25-M 160GB + 3xRAID0 500GB 7200.12 Window 7 Pro 64 Acer H243H + Samsung 226BW XARMOR-U9BL  
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Antec Truepower New 750W Li Lian PC-V2100 [10x120mm fans] Logitech G9 X-Trac Pro 
  hide details  
Reply
Once again...
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 920 [4.28GHz, HT] Asus P6T + Broadcom NetXtreme II VisionTek HD5850 [900/1200] + Galaxy GT240 2x4GB G.Skill Ripjaw X [1632 MHz] 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Intel X25-M 160GB + 3xRAID0 500GB 7200.12 Window 7 Pro 64 Acer H243H + Samsung 226BW XARMOR-U9BL  
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Antec Truepower New 750W Li Lian PC-V2100 [10x120mm fans] Logitech G9 X-Trac Pro 
  hide details  
Reply
post #10 of 23
With write-back caching enabled you shouldn't notice much difference with RAID1 vs. a single drive. RAID1 suffers most on disk writes (since the controller has to write to two drives), but read performance is identical, since RAID1 reads from only one drive.
Gutted
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E8400 4GHz 1.26V Asus Rampage Formula X38 0403 2x Diamond Radeon HD3870 Crossfire G.Skill DDR2-PC8000 2x2GB 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2xWD Caviar 500GB RAID0 Lite-ON DVDRW Vista Ultimate x64 HP w2207 
PowerCase
Thermaltake 600W Ultra Grid 
  hide details  
Reply
Gutted
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E8400 4GHz 1.26V Asus Rampage Formula X38 0403 2x Diamond Radeon HD3870 Crossfire G.Skill DDR2-PC8000 2x2GB 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2xWD Caviar 500GB RAID0 Lite-ON DVDRW Vista Ultimate x64 HP w2207 
PowerCase
Thermaltake 600W Ultra Grid 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Hard Drives & Storage
Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Hard Drives & Storage › Unhappy with RAID 1 Performance...