Overclock.net › Forums › Benchmarks › Benchmarking Software and Discussion › Shin2k35's Vista DX10 vs DX9 and 32bit vs 64bit
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Shin2k35's Vista DX10 vs DX9 and 32bit vs 64bit - Page 2

post #11 of 14
PM sent with Excel image.
post #12 of 14
Thread Starter 
Updated first post to include said excel charts.

Looking good, but it does seem that PreSLI actually runs better on lower resolutions. Very weird.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 2.66ghz Asus Striker II Formula nForce 780i Nvidia eVGA Superclocked 8800GT SLI 4 x 1GB OCZ PC8500 1066mhz SLI READY 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2 x WD 250GB SATA RAID 0 + 2 x SG 320GB Storage 2 x DVD-RW SATA+IDE Windows Vista™ Ultimate 64-bit Service Pack 1 Samsung Syncmaster 2032BW 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech EX110 Keyboard OCZ 600W StealthXStream Antec P182 Logitech EX110 Cordless Mouse 
Mouse Pad
Random Mouse Pad 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 2.66ghz Asus Striker II Formula nForce 780i Nvidia eVGA Superclocked 8800GT SLI 4 x 1GB OCZ PC8500 1066mhz SLI READY 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2 x WD 250GB SATA RAID 0 + 2 x SG 320GB Storage 2 x DVD-RW SATA+IDE Windows Vista™ Ultimate 64-bit Service Pack 1 Samsung Syncmaster 2032BW 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech EX110 Keyboard OCZ 600W StealthXStream Antec P182 Logitech EX110 Cordless Mouse 
Mouse Pad
Random Mouse Pad 
  hide details  
Reply
post #13 of 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shin2k35 View Post
Updated first post to include said excel charts.

Looking good, but it does seem that PreSLI actually runs better on lower resolutions. Very weird.
It doesn't make sense. that is really weird.
post #14 of 14
I was taking a look cause I was interested in how my 64bit OS compares to 32bit Vista. I have a Q9450 @ stock, 4GB of 800 and SLI 9600GT and a 37" LG 720p to play it on.

Anyway, from looking at the benchmarks I'd say that 64 bit is actually a little bit better despite the lower average FPS. I looked at the VH benchmarks and I rounded the #s, but compare them.


min/max/avg

1 gpu, 1024x768

32b 13.8/39.8/32.1 vs 64b 14.8/39/31.6


sli, 1024x768

32b 16/60.8/42 vs 64b 21.5/55.9/37


sli, 1680x1050

32b 15/34.5/27 vs 16.3/33.5/28


Sure the 32bit has a better average, but the 64bit has the better minimum fps across the board [at least at VH settings]. At High settings, this disparity doesn't occur and 32bit is clearly better. But if you are building a "I want to max Crysis" rig and are shooting for VH settings, then 64bit seems the better option.
Mobile Gamer IV
(8 items)
 
  
CPUGraphicsRAMOptical Drive
i7 4710HQ Nvidia GTX 980m 8GB 16GB [2x8GB] 1600MHz Blu-ray Burner 
OSKeyboardPowerCase
Windows 8.1 x64 Steel Series Full-Color Programmable 230w Power Brick MSI GT72 DOMINATOR 
  hide details  
Reply
Mobile Gamer IV
(8 items)
 
  
CPUGraphicsRAMOptical Drive
i7 4710HQ Nvidia GTX 980m 8GB 16GB [2x8GB] 1600MHz Blu-ray Burner 
OSKeyboardPowerCase
Windows 8.1 x64 Steel Series Full-Color Programmable 230w Power Brick MSI GT72 DOMINATOR 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
Overclock.net › Forums › Benchmarks › Benchmarking Software and Discussion › Shin2k35's Vista DX10 vs DX9 and 32bit vs 64bit