Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › [vr-zone]*3DMark tests*GTX295 Quad SLI vs 4870X2 Quad CFX
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[vr-zone]*3DMark tests*GTX295 Quad SLI vs 4870X2 Quad CFX - Page 5

post #41 of 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adrienspawn View Post
The clock should be inconsistent but what's important is that they were both at the shown clock when doing the test, and from other tests I've seen from VR-Zone they seem to have results in line with other sites.
I see what you mean, I just saw GPU-Z and was like WHAAAAAT!! I understand now that they were both maxed out on their clocks and honeslty it looks legit. I would think that the 295 could go higher but maybe its cooler is holding it back.
Renderman
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7 920 4ghz (3.8 24/7) ASUS P6T EVGA 55nm GTX 260 (756/1530/1140) 6gb GSkill DDR3 1600 
OSMonitorPowerCase
Windows 7 and Ubuntu Linux x64 26" Asus + 22" Acer Corsair TX850W LIAN LI Lancool PC-K62 
MouseMouse Pad
Logitech My desk 
  hide details  
Reply
Renderman
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7 920 4ghz (3.8 24/7) ASUS P6T EVGA 55nm GTX 260 (756/1530/1140) 6gb GSkill DDR3 1600 
OSMonitorPowerCase
Windows 7 and Ubuntu Linux x64 26" Asus + 22" Acer Corsair TX850W LIAN LI Lancool PC-K62 
MouseMouse Pad
Logitech My desk 
  hide details  
Reply
post #42 of 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCspecV81 View Post
once again, the ati scores are botched. Most notably the 05 score.
your proof?
(at least a screenshot actually a screenshot would be better cause with the orb we cant tell what clock speed you ran, I have settings that the orb says I ran at 3.3 when I actually ran at 4.2 lol)

reviewers got at 4.2 ghz and cards at 823 and 1050 mhz

05

33736

06

29024

vantage

P26235

Person from ocn with the exact same setup got at 4.2 and cards at 770
920

05
34812
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=4660600

06
27351
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9339483

vantage
25281
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=619097

http://www.overclock.net/5154485-post928.html


very similar results....
Who's next
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
intel core i7 965 Gigabyte x58 extreme on water 2 gtx 295s corsair dominators 3 gig DDR3 1600 mhz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
velociraptor 300 gigx2 (raid 0) sony bd-rom bdu-xs10s-hp light scribe dvd-rw windows vista 64bit samsung 24"x2, 92" with sim c3x 1080p pj 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
broken hp lol Toughpower 1200 watt cosmos s g5 
  hide details  
Reply
Who's next
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
intel core i7 965 Gigabyte x58 extreme on water 2 gtx 295s corsair dominators 3 gig DDR3 1600 mhz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
velociraptor 300 gigx2 (raid 0) sony bd-rom bdu-xs10s-hp light scribe dvd-rw windows vista 64bit samsung 24"x2, 92" with sim c3x 1080p pj 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
broken hp lol Toughpower 1200 watt cosmos s g5 
  hide details  
Reply
post #43 of 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by iggster View Post
your proof?

reviewers got at 4.2 ghz and cards at 823 and 1050 mhz

05

33736

06

29024

vantage

P26235

Person from ocn with the exact same setup got at 4.2 and cards at 770
920

05
34812
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=4660600

06
27351
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9339483

vantage
25281
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=619097

http://www.overclock.net/5154485-post928.html


very similar results....
well for one, in the 05 score I got 10-11fps more in the firefly forest test @ 3.6ghz and no gpu overclock.. sooo flawed? yes sir, indefinitely.
Always Changing
(13 items)
 
  
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
12 threads of euphemism Bash me! It's not your color! Loose. THAT'S WHAT SHE SAID! Just enough for all my cp 
OSMonitorPower
linux for gaming plethora of pixels plethora of watts 
  hide details  
Reply
Always Changing
(13 items)
 
  
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
12 threads of euphemism Bash me! It's not your color! Loose. THAT'S WHAT SHE SAID! Just enough for all my cp 
OSMonitorPower
linux for gaming plethora of pixels plethora of watts 
  hide details  
Reply
post #44 of 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCspecV81 View Post
well for one, in the 05 score I got 10-11fps more in the firefly forest test @ 3.6ghz and no gpu overclock.. sooo flawed? yes sir, indefinitely.
but your proof is where? I asked for a screenshot, I provided proof. It is only fair you do the same.

from this link on down even more proof from other i7 4870x2s results.

http://www.overclock.net/benchmarkin...ml#post5148782
Edited by iggster - 12/29/08 at 4:38pm
Who's next
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
intel core i7 965 Gigabyte x58 extreme on water 2 gtx 295s corsair dominators 3 gig DDR3 1600 mhz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
velociraptor 300 gigx2 (raid 0) sony bd-rom bdu-xs10s-hp light scribe dvd-rw windows vista 64bit samsung 24"x2, 92" with sim c3x 1080p pj 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
broken hp lol Toughpower 1200 watt cosmos s g5 
  hide details  
Reply
Who's next
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
intel core i7 965 Gigabyte x58 extreme on water 2 gtx 295s corsair dominators 3 gig DDR3 1600 mhz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
velociraptor 300 gigx2 (raid 0) sony bd-rom bdu-xs10s-hp light scribe dvd-rw windows vista 64bit samsung 24"x2, 92" with sim c3x 1080p pj 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
broken hp lol Toughpower 1200 watt cosmos s g5 
  hide details  
Reply
post #45 of 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by iggster View Post
but your proof is where? I asked for a screenshot, I provided proof. It is only fair you do the same.
The proof is in the OP, there is absolutely 0 scaling in the Firefly Forest run.
Clearly you don't have a clue about Crossfire scaling or would realize this.

Look at my 05 run, look at the FF score..get it?
Mighty-iTX
(12 items)
 
One foot in..
(17 items)
 
mATX
(12 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-4770K M7-Impact Strix GTX980 Samsung 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Crucial M4 256 Glacer 240L W8.1 K272HUL 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Saitek Seasonic X-650 Prodigy MX518 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
4770K/45/43 Maximus VI Extreme R290X R290X 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Samsung Crucial M4 64GB RAIDR LSSWM 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
Cooler Master Glacer 7 Ultimate 64 SyncMaster Eclipse 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
XFX 1050 BE 600T Silver MX518 Desk 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5-4330 Z87 Gryphon GTX690 G.Skill RipJawsX 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
WD Blacks Hyper 212 W8.1 ACER 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech Ultra X3 1000w Corsair 230T Orange Razer 
  hide details  
Reply
Mighty-iTX
(12 items)
 
One foot in..
(17 items)
 
mATX
(12 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-4770K M7-Impact Strix GTX980 Samsung 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Crucial M4 256 Glacer 240L W8.1 K272HUL 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Saitek Seasonic X-650 Prodigy MX518 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
4770K/45/43 Maximus VI Extreme R290X R290X 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Samsung Crucial M4 64GB RAIDR LSSWM 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
Cooler Master Glacer 7 Ultimate 64 SyncMaster Eclipse 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
XFX 1050 BE 600T Silver MX518 Desk 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5-4330 Z87 Gryphon GTX690 G.Skill RipJawsX 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
WD Blacks Hyper 212 W8.1 ACER 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech Ultra X3 1000w Corsair 230T Orange Razer 
  hide details  
Reply
post #46 of 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by grunion View Post
The proof is in the OP, there is absolutely 0 scaling in the Firefly Forest run.
Clearly you don't have a clue about Crossfire scaling or would realize this.

Look at my 05 run, look at the FF score..get it?
you are comparing oranges with cars I posted comparisons with the exact same setups at the exact same cpu frequencies lol How hard is it for NCspecv81 to post a comparison he said he had the setup or has an i7 setup so why is it so hard just to post some links or a screenshot (he has said many times he gets XX in 05 so why not just post it

You cant knock a review till you come with facts proving otherwise and just saying " I get this with this" doesn't cut it.
Who's next
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
intel core i7 965 Gigabyte x58 extreme on water 2 gtx 295s corsair dominators 3 gig DDR3 1600 mhz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
velociraptor 300 gigx2 (raid 0) sony bd-rom bdu-xs10s-hp light scribe dvd-rw windows vista 64bit samsung 24"x2, 92" with sim c3x 1080p pj 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
broken hp lol Toughpower 1200 watt cosmos s g5 
  hide details  
Reply
Who's next
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
intel core i7 965 Gigabyte x58 extreme on water 2 gtx 295s corsair dominators 3 gig DDR3 1600 mhz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
velociraptor 300 gigx2 (raid 0) sony bd-rom bdu-xs10s-hp light scribe dvd-rw windows vista 64bit samsung 24"x2, 92" with sim c3x 1080p pj 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
broken hp lol Toughpower 1200 watt cosmos s g5 
  hide details  
Reply
post #47 of 56
you just linked some of my proof.. even that 05 link has 20 more fps in the firefly forest test than the posted 05 run from that site.. with pretty much stock gpu's at his 4.2ghz compared to the 832 of the review site. These cards scale tremendously with even 5mhz of core increases. 832 over 770 on an x2 is a very very large increase in gpu productivity.

GT1 - Return To Proxycon 108.09 FPS
GT2 - Firefly Forest 81.2 FPS ... Notice the gigantic increase with much less freq. over the review in the same game test. Flawed much!? At those gpu & cpu speeds he should be near 100fps. AT LEAST.
GT3 - Canyon Flight 232.81 FPS

that's my 05 run @ 3.6ghz on stock vgas. Even that is 10fps higher than the 4.2ghz run on GT2.

vantage run @ 3.6ghz and vgas at only 822mhz. Can go to 875. Like I said, they are either using bummed/handicapped pre i7 hotfix drivers or their tests are completely off.


Edited by NCspecV81 - 12/29/08 at 5:01pm
Always Changing
(13 items)
 
  
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
12 threads of euphemism Bash me! It's not your color! Loose. THAT'S WHAT SHE SAID! Just enough for all my cp 
OSMonitorPower
linux for gaming plethora of pixels plethora of watts 
  hide details  
Reply
Always Changing
(13 items)
 
  
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
12 threads of euphemism Bash me! It's not your color! Loose. THAT'S WHAT SHE SAID! Just enough for all my cp 
OSMonitorPower
linux for gaming plethora of pixels plethora of watts 
  hide details  
Reply
post #48 of 56
why hide the cpu and vga? just orb link it

I asked for a screenshot cause I wanted to see at least cpu-z in it cause futuremark doesnt report the right speeds.

Quote:
Originally Posted by iggster View Post
your proof?
(at least a screenshot actually a screenshot would be better cause with the orb we cant tell what clock speed you ran, I have settings that the orb says I ran at 3.3 when I actually ran at 4.2 lol)
http://www.overclock.net/5201131-post42.html
Edited by iggster - 12/29/08 at 5:00pm
Who's next
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
intel core i7 965 Gigabyte x58 extreme on water 2 gtx 295s corsair dominators 3 gig DDR3 1600 mhz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
velociraptor 300 gigx2 (raid 0) sony bd-rom bdu-xs10s-hp light scribe dvd-rw windows vista 64bit samsung 24"x2, 92" with sim c3x 1080p pj 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
broken hp lol Toughpower 1200 watt cosmos s g5 
  hide details  
Reply
Who's next
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
intel core i7 965 Gigabyte x58 extreme on water 2 gtx 295s corsair dominators 3 gig DDR3 1600 mhz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
velociraptor 300 gigx2 (raid 0) sony bd-rom bdu-xs10s-hp light scribe dvd-rw windows vista 64bit samsung 24"x2, 92" with sim c3x 1080p pj 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
broken hp lol Toughpower 1200 watt cosmos s g5 
  hide details  
Reply
post #49 of 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by iggster View Post
why hide the cpu and vga? just orb link it

I asked for a screenshot cause I wanted to see at least cpu-z in it cause futuremark doesnt report the right speeds.



http://www.overclock.net/5201131-post42.html
you even posted an orb link with a much lesser gpu frequency with 21fps more than the reviewer got in the gt2 test in 05. How is that hard to see that the test was not flawed? The reviewer beat those orb links you posted quite convincingly in vantage, 06, 03, yet loses quite soundly in 05... LOL not sure why you think it's not flawed. So what it comes down to is that these cards do outscore the x2's in vantage (not a surprise), and in a flawed 05 run, otherwise that 05 run on the x2's would have been in the 36k region. However, makes you wonder about the other scores. Unfortunately, I have no main rig now to test those with so all I have are my 3.6 runs.

btw your frequencies aren't read by futuremark correctly due to the unlocked multiplier. 920's and 940's do not have that option, which renders that point moot.
Edited by NCspecV81 - 12/29/08 at 5:11pm
Always Changing
(13 items)
 
  
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
12 threads of euphemism Bash me! It's not your color! Loose. THAT'S WHAT SHE SAID! Just enough for all my cp 
OSMonitorPower
linux for gaming plethora of pixels plethora of watts 
  hide details  
Reply
Always Changing
(13 items)
 
  
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
12 threads of euphemism Bash me! It's not your color! Loose. THAT'S WHAT SHE SAID! Just enough for all my cp 
OSMonitorPower
linux for gaming plethora of pixels plethora of watts 
  hide details  
Reply
post #50 of 56
oh man, benchmark wars.
Renderman
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7 920 4ghz (3.8 24/7) ASUS P6T EVGA 55nm GTX 260 (756/1530/1140) 6gb GSkill DDR3 1600 
OSMonitorPowerCase
Windows 7 and Ubuntu Linux x64 26" Asus + 22" Acer Corsair TX850W LIAN LI Lancool PC-K62 
MouseMouse Pad
Logitech My desk 
  hide details  
Reply
Renderman
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7 920 4ghz (3.8 24/7) ASUS P6T EVGA 55nm GTX 260 (756/1530/1140) 6gb GSkill DDR3 1600 
OSMonitorPowerCase
Windows 7 and Ubuntu Linux x64 26" Asus + 22" Acer Corsair TX850W LIAN LI Lancool PC-K62 
MouseMouse Pad
Logitech My desk 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Hardware News
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › [vr-zone]*3DMark tests*GTX295 Quad SLI vs 4870X2 Quad CFX