As you might have noticed work units fluctuate quite a bit in PPD output, so depending on the unit you are folding you might get highly different results. This database was created to compare frame times with other users in order to see whether your PPD is where it should be or if there is something wrong with the system (instability, incorrect client configuration, throttling etc.)
Fill out the form below to submit data to the database and please maintain the proper format as good as possible.
GPU Type: ATI 4850
Model: ASUS EAH4850 TOP
Driver: Catalyst 9.2
OS: Windows 7 Beta (build 7000)
Shader (MHz): 730MHz (note, ATI cards don't have shader clocks listed, but I believe they are the same as core clocks)
Benchmarks:
353pt: only seem to get 511s and 384s
384pt: 3190.15 PPD
511pt: 2628 PPD
477pt: 3816 PPD
Notes: 586 or something around that number always crash my card immediately. I think I OC'd it too much, but everything else is stable (including 511s)
477's give me the best PPD by far, though they also make my GPU make a very quiet high pitched humming noise.
Notes:
ATI cards only get the 4 above pointers, any others are nVidia only, just as the 477 and 548 are ATI only. I also can not increase my shader as its an ATI card, hence why nVidia cards fold better.
ps. You should change to project number not credit number. And also include core speed as that changes ppd too. Also whether you use the computer a lot messes with the results.
Notes: Running one instance of Windows SMP, w/fan speed @ 40% it runs 54c.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Ask a question
Ask a question
Overclock.net
27.8M posts
541.2K members
Since 2004
A forum community dedicated to overclocking enthusiasts and testing the limits of computing. Come join the discussion about computing, builds, collections, displays, models, styles, scales, specifications, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!