Overclock.net › Forums › Benchmarks › Benchmarking Software and Discussion › *OFFICIAL* SuperPi 1M Top Times
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

*OFFICIAL* SuperPi 1M Top Times - Page 216

post #2151 of 2931
My lappy
Edit: I don't get it, is SuperPi optimised for Intel or something? AMD CPUs with huge OCs get is much slower than Intel CPUs with lower clock eg, 6 to 4 GHz

Edited by Durdle Class A - 10/28/10 at 1:38pm
Sandyman
(14 items)
 
Lenovo Y500
(8 items)
 
 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
i7 3630QM GT 650M SLI 2x4GB DDR3 1600 MHz Sandisk Extreme II 240GB 
Optical DriveOSMonitorMouse
None Windows 8 15.6" 1080p Steelseries Sensei RAW 
  hide details  
Reply
Sandyman
(14 items)
 
Lenovo Y500
(8 items)
 
 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
i7 3630QM GT 650M SLI 2x4GB DDR3 1600 MHz Sandisk Extreme II 240GB 
Optical DriveOSMonitorMouse
None Windows 8 15.6" 1080p Steelseries Sensei RAW 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2152 of 2931
Quote:
Originally Posted by Durdle Class A View Post
My lappy
Edit: I don't get it, is SuperPi optimised for Intel or something? AMD CPUs with huge OCs get is much slower than Intel CPUs with lower clock eg, 6 to 4 GHz
this is my assumption... with SuperPi
Intel mostly gets higher scores on many benchmarks softwares.... also they can manage much higher NB than AMD easily... as well having HT ON makes a big difference... so I'm guessing SuperPi.. runs like any other common benchmark software

Honestly I have no clue.... I wished AMD had higher scores on these bench stuff
Edited by sendblink23 - 10/28/10 at 1:46pm
SubCow
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom ii X4 965BE C3 @ 4.10Ghz (200x20.5) 1.5v MSI 790FX-GD70 Sapphire + XFX 5770's + EVGA 9800GTX+ 8gb (4 x 2gb) DDR3-1333 6-6-6-15-T1 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
1TB Hitachi - 500GB Seagate - 400GB Seagate LG DVD-RW Win 7 Ult x64 / Snow Leo 10.6.6 / Ubuntu 10.10 x64 AOC 2036S 20" + HP vs15 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Agiler Wireless Corsair TX850w Rosewill Challenger - CM590(dead) Agiler Wireless 
  hide details  
Reply
SubCow
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom ii X4 965BE C3 @ 4.10Ghz (200x20.5) 1.5v MSI 790FX-GD70 Sapphire + XFX 5770's + EVGA 9800GTX+ 8gb (4 x 2gb) DDR3-1333 6-6-6-15-T1 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
1TB Hitachi - 500GB Seagate - 400GB Seagate LG DVD-RW Win 7 Ult x64 / Snow Leo 10.6.6 / Ubuntu 10.10 x64 AOC 2036S 20" + HP vs15 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Agiler Wireless Corsair TX850w Rosewill Challenger - CM590(dead) Agiler Wireless 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2153 of 2931
Quote:
Originally Posted by sendblink23 View Post
this is my assumption... with SuperPi
Intel mostly gets higher scores on many benchmarks softwares.... also they can manage much higher NB than AMD easily... as well having HT ON makes a big difference... so I'm guessing SuperPi.. runs like any other common benchmark software

Honestly I have no clue.... I wished AMD had higher scores on these bench stuff
Super Pi uses a very old instruction set which Intel has continued to optimize. Super Pi is only really good for comparing between chips within the same architecture as a faster speed/memory/system generally scores higher.
Also keep in mind that it's a single core benchmark.

Nice job again Mia!
Bench Stuffs
(32 items)
 
ITX Daily Driver
(11 items)
 
For Sale: 6GHz+ 980X
$225 (USD) or best offer
CPUCPUCPUCPU
Intel Core i7 920 Intel Xeon W3520 Intel Core i7 4770K Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 
CPUCPUCPUCPU
Intel Pentium G3258 Intel QX9650 AMD FX 4300 Intel E2140 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
E4300 Asus Rampage Extreme / P5E3 Deluxe / Gigabyte X... MSI GTX 275 Lightning MSI HD 7970 Lightning 
GraphicsGraphicsGraphicsGraphics
Asus GTX 285 Matrix Platinum MSI HD 5870 Lightning EVGA GTX 980 TI Classified K|ngp|n Edition MSI GTX 580 Lightning 
RAMRAMRAMRAM
Corsair Dominator Platinum 2666 10-12-12 Samsung Corsair Dominator GT 2000 7-8-7 Hypers Kingston HyperX 2000 9-9-9 BBSE G.Skill Trident 2000 9-9-9 PSC 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Kingston SSD Now! 128GB Patriot Torqx 2 32GB Seagate 80GB XPSC Rasa + EK VGA + HWLabs Black Ice GTX 360 +... 
OSOSOSKeyboard
W7 Pro x64 SP1 Windows XP x86 SP3 W8.1 Ducky Shine 3, Cherry Brown Switches 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Corsair AX1200 Dimastech Easy V2.5! <3 Logitech G5 Battlefield 2142 Edition Puretrak Stealth 
  hide details  
Reply
Bench Stuffs
(32 items)
 
ITX Daily Driver
(11 items)
 
For Sale: 6GHz+ 980X
$225 (USD) or best offer
CPUCPUCPUCPU
Intel Core i7 920 Intel Xeon W3520 Intel Core i7 4770K Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 
CPUCPUCPUCPU
Intel Pentium G3258 Intel QX9650 AMD FX 4300 Intel E2140 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
E4300 Asus Rampage Extreme / P5E3 Deluxe / Gigabyte X... MSI GTX 275 Lightning MSI HD 7970 Lightning 
GraphicsGraphicsGraphicsGraphics
Asus GTX 285 Matrix Platinum MSI HD 5870 Lightning EVGA GTX 980 TI Classified K|ngp|n Edition MSI GTX 580 Lightning 
RAMRAMRAMRAM
Corsair Dominator Platinum 2666 10-12-12 Samsung Corsair Dominator GT 2000 7-8-7 Hypers Kingston HyperX 2000 9-9-9 BBSE G.Skill Trident 2000 9-9-9 PSC 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Kingston SSD Now! 128GB Patriot Torqx 2 32GB Seagate 80GB XPSC Rasa + EK VGA + HWLabs Black Ice GTX 360 +... 
OSOSOSKeyboard
W7 Pro x64 SP1 Windows XP x86 SP3 W8.1 Ducky Shine 3, Cherry Brown Switches 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Corsair AX1200 Dimastech Easy V2.5! <3 Logitech G5 Battlefield 2142 Edition Puretrak Stealth 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2154 of 2931
Quote:
Originally Posted by xxbassplayerxx View Post
Super Pi uses a very old instruction set which Intel has continued to optimize. Super Pi is only really good for comparing between chips within the same architecture as a faster speed/memory/system generally scores higher.
Also keep in mind that it's a single core benchmark.

Nice job again Mia!
Thank you, that surely explains allot

Mia can you run the test again... but turning off HT to see what would be difference?
SubCow
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom ii X4 965BE C3 @ 4.10Ghz (200x20.5) 1.5v MSI 790FX-GD70 Sapphire + XFX 5770's + EVGA 9800GTX+ 8gb (4 x 2gb) DDR3-1333 6-6-6-15-T1 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
1TB Hitachi - 500GB Seagate - 400GB Seagate LG DVD-RW Win 7 Ult x64 / Snow Leo 10.6.6 / Ubuntu 10.10 x64 AOC 2036S 20" + HP vs15 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Agiler Wireless Corsair TX850w Rosewill Challenger - CM590(dead) Agiler Wireless 
  hide details  
Reply
SubCow
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom ii X4 965BE C3 @ 4.10Ghz (200x20.5) 1.5v MSI 790FX-GD70 Sapphire + XFX 5770's + EVGA 9800GTX+ 8gb (4 x 2gb) DDR3-1333 6-6-6-15-T1 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
1TB Hitachi - 500GB Seagate - 400GB Seagate LG DVD-RW Win 7 Ult x64 / Snow Leo 10.6.6 / Ubuntu 10.10 x64 AOC 2036S 20" + HP vs15 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Agiler Wireless Corsair TX850w Rosewill Challenger - CM590(dead) Agiler Wireless 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2155 of 2931
HT doesn't slow Pi down as far as I can tell. However, it does add more heat and require more voltage possibly inhibiting your highest clocks.

This is as close as I could get with my submissions:





The run without HT has a higher memory clock and a lower overall clock. Since those are just random tests, they aren't controlled. I'll see if I can get some 1M runs at the same speed with HT on/off later tonight or tomorrow.


EDIT: Nolonger, I just realized I never submitted my 7.566 run here. Here are the details!


xxbassplayerxx 7.566 / Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD9 / Intel Xeon W3520 @ 5376MHz / Super Talent Speed Series DDR3 @ 2048.2MHz 7-7-7-20 1T / Dice
Bench Stuffs
(32 items)
 
ITX Daily Driver
(11 items)
 
For Sale: 6GHz+ 980X
$225 (USD) or best offer
CPUCPUCPUCPU
Intel Core i7 920 Intel Xeon W3520 Intel Core i7 4770K Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 
CPUCPUCPUCPU
Intel Pentium G3258 Intel QX9650 AMD FX 4300 Intel E2140 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
E4300 Asus Rampage Extreme / P5E3 Deluxe / Gigabyte X... MSI GTX 275 Lightning MSI HD 7970 Lightning 
GraphicsGraphicsGraphicsGraphics
Asus GTX 285 Matrix Platinum MSI HD 5870 Lightning EVGA GTX 980 TI Classified K|ngp|n Edition MSI GTX 580 Lightning 
RAMRAMRAMRAM
Corsair Dominator Platinum 2666 10-12-12 Samsung Corsair Dominator GT 2000 7-8-7 Hypers Kingston HyperX 2000 9-9-9 BBSE G.Skill Trident 2000 9-9-9 PSC 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Kingston SSD Now! 128GB Patriot Torqx 2 32GB Seagate 80GB XPSC Rasa + EK VGA + HWLabs Black Ice GTX 360 +... 
OSOSOSKeyboard
W7 Pro x64 SP1 Windows XP x86 SP3 W8.1 Ducky Shine 3, Cherry Brown Switches 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Corsair AX1200 Dimastech Easy V2.5! <3 Logitech G5 Battlefield 2142 Edition Puretrak Stealth 
  hide details  
Reply
Bench Stuffs
(32 items)
 
ITX Daily Driver
(11 items)
 
For Sale: 6GHz+ 980X
$225 (USD) or best offer
CPUCPUCPUCPU
Intel Core i7 920 Intel Xeon W3520 Intel Core i7 4770K Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 
CPUCPUCPUCPU
Intel Pentium G3258 Intel QX9650 AMD FX 4300 Intel E2140 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
E4300 Asus Rampage Extreme / P5E3 Deluxe / Gigabyte X... MSI GTX 275 Lightning MSI HD 7970 Lightning 
GraphicsGraphicsGraphicsGraphics
Asus GTX 285 Matrix Platinum MSI HD 5870 Lightning EVGA GTX 980 TI Classified K|ngp|n Edition MSI GTX 580 Lightning 
RAMRAMRAMRAM
Corsair Dominator Platinum 2666 10-12-12 Samsung Corsair Dominator GT 2000 7-8-7 Hypers Kingston HyperX 2000 9-9-9 BBSE G.Skill Trident 2000 9-9-9 PSC 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Kingston SSD Now! 128GB Patriot Torqx 2 32GB Seagate 80GB XPSC Rasa + EK VGA + HWLabs Black Ice GTX 360 +... 
OSOSOSKeyboard
W7 Pro x64 SP1 Windows XP x86 SP3 W8.1 Ducky Shine 3, Cherry Brown Switches 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Corsair AX1200 Dimastech Easy V2.5! <3 Logitech G5 Battlefield 2142 Edition Puretrak Stealth 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2156 of 2931
Quote:
Originally Posted by xxbassplayerxx View Post
Nice job again Mia!
Thanks bro

Quote:
Originally Posted by sendblink23 View Post
Mia can you run the test again... but turning off HT to see what would be difference?
HT will not help or hurt performance at the same clocks....but as bassplayer eluded to above, HT should be disabled to help reach maximum clock speed
Water & Wood
(23 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7 3820 Asus Rampage IV Formula tri-SLI GTX 580 G.Skill DDR3-1866 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
OCZ Vertex 3 Segate Momentus XT LG Blu-Ray combo drive Custom water loop for CPU & GPUs 
OSMonitorMonitorMonitor
Windows 7 x64 Ultimate Acer H5360 (100" 1280x720 3D projector) Asus VG278HE Asus VG278HE 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Asus VG278HE XARMOR U9BL Corsair AX1200 home built 
MouseAudioAudioOther
Logitch G400 Custom 7.1 home theater system 7 channel SimVibe setup with 10 tactile transdu... Fanatec ClubSport Wheel with F1 & BMW GT rims 
OtherOther
Fanatec ClubSport Pedals Thrustmaster TH 8RS manual shifter. 
  hide details  
Reply
Water & Wood
(23 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7 3820 Asus Rampage IV Formula tri-SLI GTX 580 G.Skill DDR3-1866 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
OCZ Vertex 3 Segate Momentus XT LG Blu-Ray combo drive Custom water loop for CPU & GPUs 
OSMonitorMonitorMonitor
Windows 7 x64 Ultimate Acer H5360 (100" 1280x720 3D projector) Asus VG278HE Asus VG278HE 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Asus VG278HE XARMOR U9BL Corsair AX1200 home built 
MouseAudioAudioOther
Logitch G400 Custom 7.1 home theater system 7 channel SimVibe setup with 10 tactile transdu... Fanatec ClubSport Wheel with F1 & BMW GT rims 
OtherOther
Fanatec ClubSport Pedals Thrustmaster TH 8RS manual shifter. 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2157 of 2931
I usually try to turn off HT & unnecessary cores when running superpi, just because when playing with maxxmem benchmark I noticed that at all the same cpu & mem speeds turning off the ht = better maxxmem results, turning off cores makes better maxxmem yet.
More cores & threads seems to have an impact on memory performance, I used maxxmem during the last low clock challenge to tune in my spi 1m.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 990x/3930k/3770k/4770k GB x58a-OC/Asus RIVE/x79 gd65/z77 mpower/z77 MV... gtx480s/gtx580s/7970s/680s/Titan Hyper/PSC/BBSE/Hynix/Samsung 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
HDDs/SSDs DVD Air/water/phase/copper pot Windowz 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
samsung 2320 Razer Lycosa ax1200 carboard box 
Mouse
Trackball 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 990x/3930k/3770k/4770k GB x58a-OC/Asus RIVE/x79 gd65/z77 mpower/z77 MV... gtx480s/gtx580s/7970s/680s/Titan Hyper/PSC/BBSE/Hynix/Samsung 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
HDDs/SSDs DVD Air/water/phase/copper pot Windowz 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
samsung 2320 Razer Lycosa ax1200 carboard box 
Mouse
Trackball 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2158 of 2931
@ FtW 420

So.. can I disable 1 or 2 cores... and reach a higher overclock... and will doing that improve my time?

if so.. help me on that.... do i still need to be using the same voltage i use for 4 cores as for disable cores... or how much lower i will need it down?

Example currently for me 4 cores: 4ghz 1.46v / 4.1ghz 1.5v / 4.2ghz 1.52v / 4.3ghz 1.55v

@ xxbassplayerxx & miahallen

Thanks for that extra explanation.. yeah HT seems to not do anything

I noticed more NB 2600 to 2800 gives more points differences(as compared to my ram changing speed & timings) - using the same CPU clock speed.. maybe something is going nuts on my rig

my current score: http://www.overclock.net/11148606-post2150.html
Edited by sendblink23 - 10/28/10 at 6:24pm
SubCow
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom ii X4 965BE C3 @ 4.10Ghz (200x20.5) 1.5v MSI 790FX-GD70 Sapphire + XFX 5770's + EVGA 9800GTX+ 8gb (4 x 2gb) DDR3-1333 6-6-6-15-T1 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
1TB Hitachi - 500GB Seagate - 400GB Seagate LG DVD-RW Win 7 Ult x64 / Snow Leo 10.6.6 / Ubuntu 10.10 x64 AOC 2036S 20" + HP vs15 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Agiler Wireless Corsair TX850w Rosewill Challenger - CM590(dead) Agiler Wireless 
  hide details  
Reply
SubCow
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom ii X4 965BE C3 @ 4.10Ghz (200x20.5) 1.5v MSI 790FX-GD70 Sapphire + XFX 5770's + EVGA 9800GTX+ 8gb (4 x 2gb) DDR3-1333 6-6-6-15-T1 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
1TB Hitachi - 500GB Seagate - 400GB Seagate LG DVD-RW Win 7 Ult x64 / Snow Leo 10.6.6 / Ubuntu 10.10 x64 AOC 2036S 20" + HP vs15 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Agiler Wireless Corsair TX850w Rosewill Challenger - CM590(dead) Agiler Wireless 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2159 of 2931
A higher overclock with the same hardware will usually give better times, if you can get higher with less cores go for it!
I can't be too helpful with the AMD since I know nothing about them & how they handle voltage, for i7 I usually use the same voltage for 2 cores as I would for 4.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 990x/3930k/3770k/4770k GB x58a-OC/Asus RIVE/x79 gd65/z77 mpower/z77 MV... gtx480s/gtx580s/7970s/680s/Titan Hyper/PSC/BBSE/Hynix/Samsung 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
HDDs/SSDs DVD Air/water/phase/copper pot Windowz 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
samsung 2320 Razer Lycosa ax1200 carboard box 
Mouse
Trackball 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 990x/3930k/3770k/4770k GB x58a-OC/Asus RIVE/x79 gd65/z77 mpower/z77 MV... gtx480s/gtx580s/7970s/680s/Titan Hyper/PSC/BBSE/Hynix/Samsung 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
HDDs/SSDs DVD Air/water/phase/copper pot Windowz 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
samsung 2320 Razer Lycosa ax1200 carboard box 
Mouse
Trackball 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2160 of 2931
Chill.ʇɔǝɟɟ3 10.483s / Gigabyte 790FTXA-UD5 / Phenom II 955 @ 6554MHz / Corsair Dominator GT 2000MHz @ 1506 8-8-8-21-34-1T / LN2

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
Overclock.net › Forums › Benchmarks › Benchmarking Software and Discussion › *OFFICIAL* SuperPi 1M Top Times