Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD CPUs › San Diego vs Winchester
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

San Diego vs Winchester

post #1 of 2
Thread Starter 
I was just reading the review of the DFI LP SLI-DR Expert on AnandTech.com. On one of their tests, they can reach a higher FSB with the winchester core than that of the San Diego. Im a bit confused, since i thought that the SD was the best AMD oc'er out there.
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E6300 + BT Biostar P965T sapphire x1900gt 2GB Geil Value DDR2 800 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD Benq DW1650 XP SP2 Benq 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
BenQ Antec 550W antec BenQ 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E6300 + BT Biostar P965T sapphire x1900gt 2GB Geil Value DDR2 800 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD Benq DW1650 XP SP2 Benq 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
BenQ Antec 550W antec BenQ 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2 of 2
The venice A64's and venus Opterons have so far proven to be the best AMD clockers. The SD is better than the winny IMO if only for the updated instruction set and the size(90nm vs 130).
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: AMD CPUs
Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD CPUs › San Diego vs Winchester