Overclock.net › Forums › Intel › Intel Motherboards › [Official] --The Asus P6X58D Premium & E Thread--
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[Official] --The Asus P6X58D Premium & E Thread-- - Page 125

post #1241 of 6378
quentin, you oc is quite impressive, i'm at 4.2 with h/t atm, did turning h/t off mean you can go much higher on the bclk? or is there any real world difference?
thanks
Main Rig
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 930 @ 4.2GHz 1.33V Asus P6X58D Ex 5870 Lightning G-Skill Trident (1600MHz) 7-7-7-20 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
80Gb Intel X25-M gen2 + 1Tb samsung F1 Samsung Blu-Ray Windows 7 64 bit Lg 27" Flatron "m2762d" 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Microsoft/Razor Corsair HX 850 Antec 1200 Razor Death Adder 4000Dpi 
Mouse Pad
Roccat Sota 
  hide details  
Reply
Main Rig
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 930 @ 4.2GHz 1.33V Asus P6X58D Ex 5870 Lightning G-Skill Trident (1600MHz) 7-7-7-20 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
80Gb Intel X25-M gen2 + 1Tb samsung F1 Samsung Blu-Ray Windows 7 64 bit Lg 27" Flatron "m2762d" 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Microsoft/Razor Corsair HX 850 Antec 1200 Razor Death Adder 4000Dpi 
Mouse Pad
Roccat Sota 
  hide details  
Reply
post #1242 of 6378
Quote:
Originally Posted by xmisery View Post
Yeah, the temps were pushing 83c on the hottest core. Anything above 85-90c and I start getting a little uncomfortable. Thanks for pointing out the 210 typo, all fixed now!

I kept the 7-8-7-20 timings btw. And yeah, I'm really getting the itch to go to a full water cooling setup! hehe
Hey guys, this is my first post. Now, not to trash talk, but you need to get yourself a better heatsink. Running those same settings for a 4.4ghz OC I'm getting a max temp under load of 69c

http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/6139/dsc4133.jpg
http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/3992/44ghz135v69c.png
(I could run it for a few hours but this is just a quick and dirty test fyvp).

Here is my setup:

Lian-Li PC-P50 (w/Scythe "E") + EX-322N (w/Scythe "E") + EX-H22S (w/Nexus)
i7 920 D0 @ 4.4GHZ w/HT OFF at 1.35v and 69c under full load
Asus P6X58D / Noctua NH-D14
6GB Corsair 8-8-8-24
Sapphire Vapor-X 5870 Rev.2
LSI SAS Controller
Seagate Savvio 2x146gb 10k & 1x73GB 15k
Azuntech Forte
NEC LCD2490WUXI (w/polarizer)

By the way, what is that tight Win7 gadget you have that shows the temps and what not? I need to find something like that.
Edited by kiger - 3/16/10 at 7:50am
MAIN
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-920 OC'd @ 4.2 w/HT Enabled [77c at full load] Asus P6X58D Sapphire 5870 Vapor-X CORSAIR DOMINATOR 6GB 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2 x Savvio 10k.2 146gb, 1 x Savvio 15k.1 73gb Pioneer DVR-218LBK Windows 7 Ultimate NEC LCD2490WUXi-BK-SV 24" w/Polarizer 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Belkin Ergonomic (black) CORSAIR CMPSU-850HX 850W Lian-Li PC-P50 Razer Mamba 
Mouse Pad
Icemat 
  hide details  
Reply
MAIN
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-920 OC'd @ 4.2 w/HT Enabled [77c at full load] Asus P6X58D Sapphire 5870 Vapor-X CORSAIR DOMINATOR 6GB 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2 x Savvio 10k.2 146gb, 1 x Savvio 15k.1 73gb Pioneer DVR-218LBK Windows 7 Ultimate NEC LCD2490WUXi-BK-SV 24" w/Polarizer 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Belkin Ergonomic (black) CORSAIR CMPSU-850HX 850W Lian-Li PC-P50 Razer Mamba 
Mouse Pad
Icemat 
  hide details  
Reply
post #1243 of 6378
Quote:
Originally Posted by kiger View Post
Hey guys, this is my first post. Now, not to trash talk, but you need to get yourself a better heatsink. Running those same settings for a 4.4ghz OC I'm getting a max temp under load of 69c

http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/3992/44ghz135v69c.png
(I could run it for a few hours but this is just a quick and dirty test fyvp).

Here is my setup:

Lian-Li PC-P50 (w/Scythe "E") + EX-322N (w/Scythe "E") + EX-H22S (w/Nexus)
i7 920 D0 @ 4.4GHZ w/HT OFF at 1.35v and 69c under full load
Asus P6X58D / Noctua NH-D14
6GB Corsair 8-8-8-24
Sapphire Vapor-X 5870 Rev.2
LSI SAS Controller
Seagate Savvio 2x146gb 10k & 1x73GB 15k
Azuntech Forte
NEC LCD2490WUXI (w/polarizer)

By the way, what is that tight Win7 gadget you have that shows the temps and what not? I need to find something like that.
The corsair H50 definitely has its limitations. It can't really compete against high end-air solutions paired with high cfm fans.

I use everest but you have to pay for it....lets you have a nice gadget that shows everything you need.
post #1244 of 6378
Isn't there a wall at 220 bclk because of the qpi limitation?

QPI has to be less than 4.0, and once you hit 220 you are surpassing that limit unless you run in QPI link slow mode.

Someone else wanna confirm/verify?
post #1245 of 6378
I just got a BSOD last night that clearly indicated 'memory corruption' in the analysis of minidump file. I am using xmiserys setting for the 4.20 OC w/HT. The only other setting I adjusted were the ram timings to 8-8-8-24-1N. Am I doing something wrong? Any suggestions hot to rectify this? I can't seem to keep a stable sytem and I'm sure I'm doing somethig wrong or need to adjust something.

Thanks,
Jim
post #1246 of 6378
When it BSOD'd, did it give you a "The system has encountered an unrecoverable error and must shut down" message, or a "Page fault in non-paged area" message?

The first needs more QPI. The second points to memory voltage or timings.
post #1247 of 6378
************************************************** *****************************
* *
* Bugcheck Analysis *
* *
************************************************** *****************************

Use !analyze -v to get detailed debugging information.

BugCheck 1E, {ffffffffc0000005, fffff80002ec11a7, 1, 23883}

Probably caused by : memory_corruption

Followup: memory_corruption
---------

0: kd> !analyze -v
************************************************** *****************************
* *
* Bugcheck Analysis *
* *
************************************************** *****************************

KMODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED (1e)
This is a very common bugcheck. Usually the exception address pinpoints
the driver/function that caused the problem. Always note this address
as well as the link date of the driver/image that contains this address.
Arguments:
Arg1: ffffffffc0000005, The exception code that was not handled
Arg2: fffff80002ec11a7, The address that the exception occurred at
Arg3: 0000000000000001, Parameter 0 of the exception
Arg4: 0000000000023883, Parameter 1 of the exception

Debugging Details:
------------------


EXCEPTION_CODE: (NTSTATUS) 0xc0000005 - The instruction at 0x%08lx referenced memory at 0x%08lx. The memory could not be %s.

FAULTING_IP:
nt!KeInitThread+9f
fffff800`02ec11a7 ff8983380200 dec dword ptr [rcx+23883h]

EXCEPTION_PARAMETER1: 0000000000000001

EXCEPTION_PARAMETER2: 0000000000023883

WRITE_ADDRESS: GetPointerFromAddress: unable to read from fffff80002ebd0e0
0000000000023883

ERROR_CODE: (NTSTATUS) 0xc0000005 - The instruction at 0x%08lx referenced memory at 0x%08lx. The memory could not be %s.

BUGCHECK_STR: 0x1E_c0000005

CUSTOMER_CRASH_COUNT: 1

DEFAULT_BUCKET_ID: CODE_CORRUPTION

PROCESS_NAME: explorer.exe

CURRENT_IRQL: 0

TRAP_FRAME: fffff880073048c0 -- (.trap 0xfffff880073048c0)
NOTE: The trap frame does not contain all registers.
Some register values may be zeroed or incorrect.
rax=fffffa80070262a0 rbx=0000000000000000 rcx=0000000000000000
rdx=0000000000000000 rsi=0000000000000000 rdi=0000000000000000
rip=fffff80002ec11a7 rsp=fffff88007304a58 rbp=fffffa80082ea060
r8=fffff80002f52040 r9=0000000000000000 r10=fffffa8008519970
r11=0000000000000000 r12=0000000000000000 r13=0000000000000000
r14=0000000000000000 r15=0000000000000000
iopl=0 nv up ei pl nz na pe nc
nt!KeInitThread+0x9f:
fffff800`02ec11a7 ff8983380200 dec dword ptr [rcx+23883h] ds:a060:00000000`00023883=????????
Resetting default scope

LAST_CONTROL_TRANSFER: from fffff80002cc6a17 to fffff80002c86f00

STACK_TEXT:
fffff880`07304038 fffff800`02cc6a17 : 00000000`0000001e ffffffff`c0000005 fffff800`02ec11a7 00000000`00000001 : nt!KeBugCheckEx
fffff880`07304040 fffff800`02c86542 : fffff880`07304818 fffffa80`07026060 fffff880`073048c0 00000000`00000000 : nt! ?? ::FNODOBFM::`string'+0x460da
fffff880`073046e0 fffff800`02c850ba : 00000000`00000001 fffffa80`07026060 00000000`0ad20000 fffffa80`057c3860 : nt!KiExceptionDispatch+0xc2
fffff880`073048c0 fffff800`02ec11a7 : 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 00000000`0ad20000 00000000`00000000 : nt!KiPageFault+0x23a
fffff880`07304a58 00000000`00000000 : fffff800`02f4f573 fffffa80`07026060 00000000`00001000 00000000`07020000 : nt!KeInitThread+0x9f


STACK_COMMAND: kb

CHKIMG_EXTENSION: !chkimg -lo 50 -db !nt
13 errors : !nt (fffff80002ec1187-fffff80002ec127f)
fffff80002ec1180 e0 fe 0b c1 89 83 00 *00 00 00 83 8b 00 01 00 00 ................
fffff80002ec1190 40 83 4b 4c 01 48 8d *00 50 48 89 8b 30 02 00 00 @.KL.H..PH..0...
fffff80002ec11a0 48 8d 83 40 02 00 00 *ff 89 83 38 02 00 00 48 *ff H..@......8...H.
fffff80002ec11b0 49 08 48 89 09 48 8d *20 60 48 89 40 08 48 89 00 I.H..H. `H.@.H..
...
fffff80002ec1240 be ff ff 8b c8 49 d3 *e5 4c 33 c8 4d 89 4a 30 *00 .....I..L3.M.J0.
fffff80002ec1250 8d 93 98 01 00 00 b8 *00 01 00 00 66 89 42 28 *00 ...........f.B(.
fffff80002ec1260 42 2a 01 c6 42 2b 02 *00 8d 4a 08 48 8b 01 48 *00 B*..B+...J.H..H.
fffff80002ec1270 02 48 89 4a 08 48 89 *00 08 48 89 11 48 83 a3 *00 .H.J.H...H..H...

MODULE_NAME: memory_corruption

IMAGE_NAME: memory_corruption

FOLLOWUP_NAME: memory_corruption

DEBUG_FLR_IMAGE_TIMESTAMP: 0

MEMORY_CORRUPTOR: STRIDE

FAILURE_BUCKET_ID: X64_MEMORY_CORRUPTION_STRIDE

BUCKET_ID: X64_MEMORY_CORRUPTION_STRIDE

Followup: memory_corruption
---------





This is the apparent reading of the dump file. I think I remember it saying "The system has encountered an unrecoverable error and must shut down".
post #1248 of 6378
Bump up your QPI two notches and retest. Did it BSOD during a stress test?
post #1249 of 6378
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackDragon24 View Post
Bump up your QPI two notches and retest. Did it BSOD during a stress test?
in the few tests I did with memtest86 (13 passes) and Prime95 (8 hours) it did not BSOD. Ok, I will look for that setting in BIOS and bump it 2 notches like you say. I hope it works. I'm going nuts trying to get this frigging system not to give me BSOD every day. Thank for your advice :-)
Edited by buffalofloyd - 3/16/10 at 9:31am
post #1250 of 6378
Memtest86 is kind of useless for the i7 platform. It may tell you that the memory is ok but it does not tell you much how about the memory interacts with the IMC of the processor, so passing memtest86 doesn't mean much in real world. 8h of prime95 is good but it must be blend test or else you are only really testing the processor and not the memory controller.

Most guys here will recommend Linx with 25000 problem size 20 passes. If it passes that you should be pretty damn stable.
Edited by BlackDragon24 - 3/16/10 at 9:38am
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Intel Motherboards
Overclock.net › Forums › Intel › Intel Motherboards › [Official] --The Asus P6X58D Premium & E Thread--