Hello All!
I am a little confused about the whole single vs dual channel ram concept. I know that dual is better than single, performance wise, but by how much?
I guess I should outline the current scenario for you. My partner's computer is quite slow. It's running a 2.66GHz Northwood, with 533MHz FSB and 512KB L2. It's also got 512MB RAM in the form of 2 modules of 256MB, running at "dual channel" DDR266. Now my partner is getting frustrated with the slow speed of her computer and I happen to have (lying around from a build that never took place) an ASRock MB, 512MB (single module) of DDR400 RAM and a 3.2GHz Prescott (Skt.478).
I was thinking that I could just install the ASRock motherboard with the RAM and CPU that is on it, replacing my partners existing northwood set-up. Because her current motherboard wont run Prescott core P4's, it's either install the ASRock board with the Pressy on it, or buy a new board...
So, I guess what I am actually trying to ask (excuse me, I am very tired right now) is how much of a performance increase is she likely to see going from this set-up:
--------------------------
2.66GHz Northwood, 512KB L2, 533MHz FSB, No Hyperthreading
512MB DDR266 RAM (2 x 256MB Modules) in "dual channel" (533MHz)
--------------------------
to this set-up:
--------------------------
3.2GHz Prescott, 1024KB L2, 800MHz FSB, with Hyperthreading
512MB DD400 RAM (1 x 512MB Module) in "single channel" (400MHz)
--------------------------
OK, yes, obviously the processor will be 540MHz (20%) faster and it will have 2x as much L2 cache AND will utilise Hyperthreading, but the RAM's total speed (due to being in single channel) will be 133MHz (25%) slower...
What will this overall slower ram bus speed mean for the overall performance of the system? Will it actually be worth the hassle of installing the Prescott set-up for my partner, or will she notice a significant increase in overall system performance with the Presscott set-up installed? I don't know... 
I just dont know how big a role the bus speed plays in overall system performance... If the CPU bus speed is 800MHz (as it is with the prescott) but the total RAM bus speed is only 400MHz (due to being in single channel) what system bus speed is the system running at? Is it 400MHz, or 800MHz with the RAM taking twice as long as other system components to do its job, or some intermediate speed?
I would appreciate (and rep) any help you can give, either about the two systems compared above, or the dual channel / single channel concept specifically.
Thanks for your help guys!
Highly-Annoyed
I am a little confused about the whole single vs dual channel ram concept. I know that dual is better than single, performance wise, but by how much?
I guess I should outline the current scenario for you. My partner's computer is quite slow. It's running a 2.66GHz Northwood, with 533MHz FSB and 512KB L2. It's also got 512MB RAM in the form of 2 modules of 256MB, running at "dual channel" DDR266. Now my partner is getting frustrated with the slow speed of her computer and I happen to have (lying around from a build that never took place) an ASRock MB, 512MB (single module) of DDR400 RAM and a 3.2GHz Prescott (Skt.478).
I was thinking that I could just install the ASRock motherboard with the RAM and CPU that is on it, replacing my partners existing northwood set-up. Because her current motherboard wont run Prescott core P4's, it's either install the ASRock board with the Pressy on it, or buy a new board...
So, I guess what I am actually trying to ask (excuse me, I am very tired right now) is how much of a performance increase is she likely to see going from this set-up:
--------------------------
2.66GHz Northwood, 512KB L2, 533MHz FSB, No Hyperthreading
512MB DDR266 RAM (2 x 256MB Modules) in "dual channel" (533MHz)
--------------------------
to this set-up:
--------------------------
3.2GHz Prescott, 1024KB L2, 800MHz FSB, with Hyperthreading
512MB DD400 RAM (1 x 512MB Module) in "single channel" (400MHz)
--------------------------
OK, yes, obviously the processor will be 540MHz (20%) faster and it will have 2x as much L2 cache AND will utilise Hyperthreading, but the RAM's total speed (due to being in single channel) will be 133MHz (25%) slower...
What will this overall slower ram bus speed mean for the overall performance of the system? Will it actually be worth the hassle of installing the Prescott set-up for my partner, or will she notice a significant increase in overall system performance with the Presscott set-up installed? I don't know... 
I just dont know how big a role the bus speed plays in overall system performance... If the CPU bus speed is 800MHz (as it is with the prescott) but the total RAM bus speed is only 400MHz (due to being in single channel) what system bus speed is the system running at? Is it 400MHz, or 800MHz with the RAM taking twice as long as other system components to do its job, or some intermediate speed?
I would appreciate (and rep) any help you can give, either about the two systems compared above, or the dual channel / single channel concept specifically.
Thanks for your help guys!
Highly-Annoyed






