Since this thread was found via google, ...
just here to report some differences between AHCI vs IDE on win 7 64bit (using MS drivers which means TRIM is on)
Using Intel x25-m 80GB (G2),
on AHCI, Intel Toolbox doesn't allow you to run Intel SSD Optimizer (but it's ok, since OS does TRIM, you won't need to - I'd say; after a month or more I switched back to IDE so I could run it and it finished in a second as always - if there was a need to run it(meaning TRIM didn't work?), it would've prolly taken minutes)

On IDE, this is HDTune results with Intel X25-m 80G (G2):

as you can see above, the fourth core is 100% used (25% cpu usage reported since it's 4 core cpu), and ssd speed depends on the CPU speed, ie. lower CPU speed (ie. by limiting it via Power Options) means lower ssd transfer speeds(if you don't believe me ask and I'll post some screenies). The fourth core is actually used 100% due to Interrupts (as reported in Process Explorer).

Now, on AHCI, this is HDTune results with Intel X25-m 80G (G2):

as you see here, higher transfer speed and lower cpu usage(5% vs 26%) with AHCI

So, for me, AHCI for the win.
EDIT: intel x25-m 80g Postville 34nm 2.5" (INTEL SSDSA2M080G2GC) revision: 2CV102HD on sata2; Controller TypeIntel PC29AS21BA0
and switching between IDE and AHCI (while windows was installed when ssd was on IDE - because due to a bios bug AHCI bios would freeze, so I had to update bios later to be able to use AHCI at all) was possible by only reboot and changing the bios setting: from IDE to AHCI and reverse (no need to reinstall anything; in my case anyways)
MOBO: Gigabyte GA-MA790FXT-UD5P
CPU: Phenom II X4 965 rev.RB-C2
OS: Win 7 64bit
mem: 4x2GB DDR3 Unganged, Dual Ch.
Edited by joojooo - 8/21/11 at 11:25pm
just here to report some differences between AHCI vs IDE on win 7 64bit (using MS drivers which means TRIM is on)
Using Intel x25-m 80GB (G2),
on AHCI, Intel Toolbox doesn't allow you to run Intel SSD Optimizer (but it's ok, since OS does TRIM, you won't need to - I'd say; after a month or more I switched back to IDE so I could run it and it finished in a second as always - if there was a need to run it(meaning TRIM didn't work?), it would've prolly taken minutes)

On IDE, this is HDTune results with Intel X25-m 80G (G2):

as you can see above, the fourth core is 100% used (25% cpu usage reported since it's 4 core cpu), and ssd speed depends on the CPU speed, ie. lower CPU speed (ie. by limiting it via Power Options) means lower ssd transfer speeds(if you don't believe me ask and I'll post some screenies). The fourth core is actually used 100% due to Interrupts (as reported in Process Explorer).

Now, on AHCI, this is HDTune results with Intel X25-m 80G (G2):

as you see here, higher transfer speed and lower cpu usage(5% vs 26%) with AHCI

So, for me, AHCI for the win.
EDIT: intel x25-m 80g Postville 34nm 2.5" (INTEL SSDSA2M080G2GC) revision: 2CV102HD on sata2; Controller TypeIntel PC29AS21BA0
and switching between IDE and AHCI (while windows was installed when ssd was on IDE - because due to a bios bug AHCI bios would freeze, so I had to update bios later to be able to use AHCI at all) was possible by only reboot and changing the bios setting: from IDE to AHCI and reverse (no need to reinstall anything; in my case anyways)
MOBO: Gigabyte GA-MA790FXT-UD5P
CPU: Phenom II X4 965 rev.RB-C2
OS: Win 7 64bit
mem: 4x2GB DDR3 Unganged, Dual Ch.
Edited by joojooo - 8/21/11 at 11:25pm







