post #1 of 1
Thread Starter 
Well, I compared my pc (on the left) with the only other pc I could find with a processor around my speed and 9600XT (which I am running as well).
So, I have 930Mhz celeron (III), and he/she has 1200Mhz PIII. I have 2x128MB pc 133 SDRAM, he/she's got 1280MB pc 133 SDRAM. We are both running AGP 4x. Now, my overclock to my 9600xt is only to the memory as I found that for some reason (with AA and AF disabled, might be different with those settings on) when OC'ing the core I didn't really gain any performance (in fact I lost a tiny bit), and the memory didn't seem as stable for some reason. I could run much higher core, but for some reason I had to lower mem OC to accomplish this without a ton of artifacting. So for now, I just OC'ed the memory until I can get the Zalman or something to keep her cool.
My final stable OC of 500 core and 720 mem. My pc seems to demolish this guys/girls for some reason, even though their system specs are a little higher than mine, especially in the ram department. There's no way my OC netted THAT much of an improvement over his setup, is there?

And the screenies of the whole comparison from futuremark:

My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardOSPower
Sempron 2800+ Socket 754 ECS nForce3 250gb Windows XP Pro Antec 400watt 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardOSPower
Sempron 2800+ Socket 754 ECS nForce3 250gb Windows XP Pro Antec 400watt 
  hide details  
Reply