Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD CPUs › X2 comparision
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

X2 comparision

post #1 of 56
Thread Starter 
Hey,

I`m looking into buying either the 3800+ or the 4400+ X2 in a few days time and had a few questions about the purchase.

1) Will there be any real noticeable difference between the 512MB cache and the 1MB cache ? I know this seems silly but I've been reading some people don't notice that big a performance boost.

2) Will I be able to get just as much power out of the 3800+ O/C wise as the 4400+? Again, from what I have been reading in other forums, the 3800+ can reach the same O/C limit as the 4400+.

Basicaly I`m just wondering if it is worth my time buying a the 4400+ or wether the 3800+ is currently a better choice when it comes to "Bang per Buck".
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardOSMonitor
AMD 3700+ San Diego Asus A8N-SLI Premium Windows XP Pro SP2 20" LG LCD 
PowerCaseMouse
480W Tagan 2Force SLi Akasa Eclipse 62 MS Optical 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardOSMonitor
AMD 3700+ San Diego Asus A8N-SLI Premium Windows XP Pro SP2 20" LG LCD 
PowerCaseMouse
480W Tagan 2Force SLi Akasa Eclipse 62 MS Optical 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2 of 56
The L2 cache will make a small difference to apps, but nothing major really. The 3800+ normally get to around 2.6Ghz overclocked, the 4400+ maybe a little higher.
If you can get your hands on an Opteron 165 then these have the same L2 cache as the 4400+ and are about the same price as the 3800+ and normally overclock a bit higher as well. Something to consider if you can manage to find one in stock anywhere.
Clevo P170HM
(6 items)
 
  
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
i7 2760QM HD 6990m Samsung 1333mhz Crucial M4 SSD 
Hard DriveOS
Western Digital Black 500gb Windows 7 64 Bit 
  hide details  
Reply
Clevo P170HM
(6 items)
 
  
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
i7 2760QM HD 6990m Samsung 1333mhz Crucial M4 SSD 
Hard DriveOS
Western Digital Black 500gb Windows 7 64 Bit 
  hide details  
Reply
post #3 of 56
The extra cache may make a difference when doing extreme multitasking, but for most situations you won't notice a difference. The 4400+ also has the better E6 controller which should make it a tad bit faster clock for clock, but the price difference really doesn't justify the performance difference. I would go for the 3800+ and save the rest for another upgrade, i.e. a power supply if you plan on utilizing sli or upgrading cooling.
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Athlon64 3700+ clawhammer DFI Lanparty UT NF3 250Gb X1900GT 1gb 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
120gb XP Pro SP2 19" Hanns widescreen Rosewill 600W 
Mouse
Logitech MX 610 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Athlon64 3700+ clawhammer DFI Lanparty UT NF3 250Gb X1900GT 1gb 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
120gb XP Pro SP2 19" Hanns widescreen Rosewill 600W 
Mouse
Logitech MX 610 
  hide details  
Reply
post #4 of 56
well i would say to go with the dual core because the new os will apparently run ALOT better with it, also games will soon be supporting them, soo overall ne dual core u get will be more future proof at this moment in time
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core 2 duo E6700 ASUS P5W-DH x1900xtx geil pc6400 4x1gb ddr2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
250gb sata 2 + 160gb slave WD's sony DVD+/-rw and a CD r/w WINDOWS XP PRO SP2 17" philips + 19" xerox 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Microsoft-multimedia tagan 580w modular thermaltake kandalf logitech cordless 
Mouse Pad
kronembourg beer mat 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core 2 duo E6700 ASUS P5W-DH x1900xtx geil pc6400 4x1gb ddr2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
250gb sata 2 + 160gb slave WD's sony DVD+/-rw and a CD r/w WINDOWS XP PRO SP2 17" philips + 19" xerox 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Microsoft-multimedia tagan 580w modular thermaltake kandalf logitech cordless 
Mouse Pad
kronembourg beer mat 
  hide details  
Reply
post #5 of 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ste
The L2 cache will make a small difference to apps, but nothing major really. The 3800+ normally get to around 2.6Ghz overclocked, the 4400+ maybe a little higher.
If you can get your hands on an Opteron 165 then these have the same L2 cache as the 4400+ and are about the same price as the 3800+ and normally overclock a bit higher as well. Something to consider if you can manage to find one in stock anywhere.
I would have suggested the same thing before AMD raised their opteron prices
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Athlon64 3700+ clawhammer DFI Lanparty UT NF3 250Gb X1900GT 1gb 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
120gb XP Pro SP2 19" Hanns widescreen Rosewill 600W 
Mouse
Logitech MX 610 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Athlon64 3700+ clawhammer DFI Lanparty UT NF3 250Gb X1900GT 1gb 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
120gb XP Pro SP2 19" Hanns widescreen Rosewill 600W 
Mouse
Logitech MX 610 
  hide details  
Reply
post #6 of 56
I would get the 4400 over the 3800. The extra cache will equate in power to about a 200 mhz gain over a chip of the same clock speed with only 512 cache. So lets say you have a chip that runs at 2.2 ghz and has a meg of L2 cache. Now you have a chip that has 512 L2 cache, it will have to run at 2.4 just to be equal to the 2.2 chip with 1 meg of L2 cache in performance. So you will always be better off with more L2 cache.

Another thing to consider is the 4400 has a higher clock than the 3800 at the same vcore. 3800=2.0 ghz at 1.35 vcore, while 4400=2.2 ghz at 1.35 vcore. So the 4400 is already the better chip. Remember the 3800 will have to run at 2.4 ghz just to equal the performance of the stock 4400. So the 4400 already has the upper hand and IMO is the best choice. Trust me I have been weighing these chips too, I'm about to buy one for myself and am leaning towards the 4400.
My Sandy Rig
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 2700K 4.8ghz @ 1.32 vcore Asus P8Z68-V/Gen3 PowerColor 7950 Boost Patriot DDR3 1600 4gb x 2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
WD 1TB, 750 black LG SATA DVD burner Corsair A70 dual fan 7 Home Premium 64bit 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Zalman 23"  Azio PC P & C 750 Silencer NZXT ZERO 
MouseMouse Pad
Logitech MX-500 Laser My Desk 
  hide details  
Reply
My Sandy Rig
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 2700K 4.8ghz @ 1.32 vcore Asus P8Z68-V/Gen3 PowerColor 7950 Boost Patriot DDR3 1600 4gb x 2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
WD 1TB, 750 black LG SATA DVD burner Corsair A70 dual fan 7 Home Premium 64bit 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Zalman 23"  Azio PC P & C 750 Silencer NZXT ZERO 
MouseMouse Pad
Logitech MX-500 Laser My Desk 
  hide details  
Reply
post #7 of 56
does the 4400+ have 1mb of cache per core or is it 1mb in total?
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core 2 duo E6700 ASUS P5W-DH x1900xtx geil pc6400 4x1gb ddr2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
250gb sata 2 + 160gb slave WD's sony DVD+/-rw and a CD r/w WINDOWS XP PRO SP2 17" philips + 19" xerox 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Microsoft-multimedia tagan 580w modular thermaltake kandalf logitech cordless 
Mouse Pad
kronembourg beer mat 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core 2 duo E6700 ASUS P5W-DH x1900xtx geil pc6400 4x1gb ddr2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
250gb sata 2 + 160gb slave WD's sony DVD+/-rw and a CD r/w WINDOWS XP PRO SP2 17" philips + 19" xerox 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Microsoft-multimedia tagan 580w modular thermaltake kandalf logitech cordless 
Mouse Pad
kronembourg beer mat 
  hide details  
Reply
post #8 of 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve!!
does the 4400+ have 1mb of cache per core or is it 1mb in total?
1mb per core. So each core has 1mb of L2 cache. Also the X2's have more L1 cache that the Opterons, 128+128 versus 64+64. Just another thing to keep in mind.
My Sandy Rig
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 2700K 4.8ghz @ 1.32 vcore Asus P8Z68-V/Gen3 PowerColor 7950 Boost Patriot DDR3 1600 4gb x 2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
WD 1TB, 750 black LG SATA DVD burner Corsair A70 dual fan 7 Home Premium 64bit 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Zalman 23"  Azio PC P & C 750 Silencer NZXT ZERO 
MouseMouse Pad
Logitech MX-500 Laser My Desk 
  hide details  
Reply
My Sandy Rig
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 2700K 4.8ghz @ 1.32 vcore Asus P8Z68-V/Gen3 PowerColor 7950 Boost Patriot DDR3 1600 4gb x 2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
WD 1TB, 750 black LG SATA DVD burner Corsair A70 dual fan 7 Home Premium 64bit 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Zalman 23"  Azio PC P & C 750 Silencer NZXT ZERO 
MouseMouse Pad
Logitech MX-500 Laser My Desk 
  hide details  
Reply
post #9 of 56
Here's a comparison benchmark between lots of the more recent CPUs. Really good for comparing the performance at stock levels in all sorts of benchmarks inc games: http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu.ht...2=241&chart=70
It also shows you the difference between a 3500+ and a 3700+ so you can see the difference that L2 cache makes.
Clevo P170HM
(6 items)
 
  
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
i7 2760QM HD 6990m Samsung 1333mhz Crucial M4 SSD 
Hard DriveOS
Western Digital Black 500gb Windows 7 64 Bit 
  hide details  
Reply
Clevo P170HM
(6 items)
 
  
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
i7 2760QM HD 6990m Samsung 1333mhz Crucial M4 SSD 
Hard DriveOS
Western Digital Black 500gb Windows 7 64 Bit 
  hide details  
Reply
post #10 of 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by lonnie5000
I would get the 4400 over the 3800. The extra cache will equate in power to about a 200 mhz gain over a chip of the same clock speed with only 512 cache. So lets say you have a chip that runs at 2.2 ghz and has a meg of L2 cache. Now you have a chip that has 512 L2 cache, it will have to run at 2.4 just to be equal to the 2.2 chip with 1 meg of L2 cache in performance. So you will always be better off with more L2 cache.

Another thing to consider is the 4400 has a higher clock than the 3800 at the same vcore. 3800=2.0 ghz at 1.35 vcore, while 4400=2.2 ghz at 1.35 vcore. So the 4400 is already the better chip. Remember the 3800 will have to run at 2.4 ghz just to equal the performance of the stock 4400. So the 4400 already has the upper hand and IMO is the best choice. Trust me I have been weighing these chips too, I'm about to buy one for myself and am leaning towards the 4400.
The extra cache doesn't prove that. There have been many tests showing otherwise. Only in very specific areas does the extra 512kb of cache make a significant difference. Look at pentium processors, presslers have up to 4mb of total cache ! But that certainly won't equate to 2ghz of extra performance lol

edit:and
Quote:
Originally Posted by lonnie5000
1mb per core. So each core has 1mb of L2 cache. Also the X2's have more L1 cache that the Opterons, 128+128 versus 64+64. Just another thing to keep in mind.
No they don't, each core has 64KB of both data and instruction L1 cache, so 256KB of L1 cache total on a dual core
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Athlon64 3700+ clawhammer DFI Lanparty UT NF3 250Gb X1900GT 1gb 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
120gb XP Pro SP2 19" Hanns widescreen Rosewill 600W 
Mouse
Logitech MX 610 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Athlon64 3700+ clawhammer DFI Lanparty UT NF3 250Gb X1900GT 1gb 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
120gb XP Pro SP2 19" Hanns widescreen Rosewill 600W 
Mouse
Logitech MX 610 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: AMD CPUs
Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD CPUs › X2 comparision