Quote:
Originally Posted by SciFi Robot
I also have this motherboard and a 2tb samsung f3 drive. Thanks to your post I can now use the drive when plugged into the white port.
Any chance you can access your smart data and check the spin up time history? I use speedfan for this and it originally told me to replace the drive immedialtly which was worrying because it caused me to not use it for the first 2 weeks after purchase. Now it tells me spin up is ok but has had a problem in the past and should be monitored closely.
Basically this has devalued my drive if I ever want to sell it on
Another thing you might want to know is that it will work in an external enclosue using an esata to sata converter where the enclosure has its own psu. (on all sata ports). You could use that as a temp solution to your raid perhaps.
Please do post your smart result I would appreciate it thanks.
|
I'm wondering if it's a compatibility problem with all Samsung hard drives on SATA 6Gb/s ports or just this board?
I've never looked at SMART data before. I downloaded SpeedFan but there is nothing in the SMART tab (the drop down box next to Hard disk doesn't have any drives listed). I don't have a eSATA enclosure. I might as well just plug it inside to the white ports. There is no built-in eSATA port on the I/O panel, and using an eSATA port on the front of a case wouldn't change anything because it would be plugged into the white port anyway. The problem is there are no RAID drivers for the white ports. At least the ones on Gigabyte's site didn't work so I assume they are for the 6Gb/s ports. The blue ports are controlled by the SB850 Southbridge and the white ports are controlled by a separate chip that Gigabyte added, that's why they need separate RAID drivers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SciFi Robot
I just noticed your 3.8ghz on your cpu, what settings do i need to change for this? I got the same cpu i think, its the 2.8ghz 6 x core.
|
Here are all the BIOS settings I changed and what I change them to:
Menu: MB Intelligent Tweaker(M.I.T.)
CPU Clock Ratio: [x12.5] 3800MHz
CPU NorthBridge Freq: [x7] 2128MHz
CPU Host Clock Control: [Manual]
CPU Frequency(MHz): [304]
PCIE Clock (MHZ): [100]
HT Link Width: [Auto]
HT Link Frequency: [x7] 2128MHz
Memory Clock: [x5.33] 1620MHz
CPU PLL Voltage Control: [2.5v]
DRAM Voltage Control: [1.65v]
NB Voltage Control: [1.3v]
SidePort Voltage: [1.6v]
NB/PCIe/PLL Voltage Control: [1.8v]
CPU Voltage Control: [+0.05v] 1.475v
Anything I didn't mention I left at Auto. Realize my motherboard chipset voltages might be sightly different than yours if you have a different motherboard. I turned off Turbo CORE but left Cool'N'Quiet on. After finding the max overclock for the processor I manually changed the RAM timings and found the perfect clock for it. It's better to only overclock one thing at a time so you know what is cause instability if you run into it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SciFi Robot
Thanks Toxic, the man in the video said you dont have to disable the turbo button but what would happen if just 3 cores went above the 4ghz? would they have a better stability margin than all 6 cores do you know?
Also is it the front side bus or something that gets increased instead of the multiplier? Why does Amd let both the 1055t and 1090t cpu's go to 4ghz but only unlock the multiplier on the expensive one and make you take an alternative path on the 1055t to give the same result? I know its the same with previous technology but I have never fully understood why they do this.
Are benchmarks the same for both cpu's running at 4ghz but with different oc method?
|
I would highly suggest turning off Turbo CORE. Only in the case of a light overclocking could you possibly leave it on. Another problem is it increases the voltage too, which can be a problem if you already raised the voltage to stabilize an overclock.
That is correct with the 1055T you have to overclock the base clock and with the 1090T you can both overclock the base clock and raise the multiplier. Losing money due to overclockers is really a non-issue for AMD and Intel because so few people do it. Think about it, how many people build their own computers, how many of those people have motherboards that can overclock, and then how many of those people actually overclock their computers? That's a very small group compared to how many people buy OEM computers. Most OEM computers have a locked BIOS that can't overclock. If they locked the base clock in the CPU itself that would make us enthusiast really mad and would give a competitive advantage to their competitor if they don't do the same.
Edited by Ben the OCer - 5/8/10 at 11:17am