Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD CPUs › san diego core/venice core which is better
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

san diego core/venice core which is better

post #1 of 4
Thread Starter 
I have recently bought a amd athlon 3700 sandiego core and my friend phonx has a venice core 3500. What is the difference between these cores and which is better>>>
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD 64 3700+ (san diego) ASUS A8N-SLI Premium MSI 7900 GTO 512MB 1gb mushkin high prfrmnce 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
western digital 120gb xp pro DELL!!!! 21" saitek gaming 
PowerCaseMouse
hiper 580w type R aspier x cruiser logitec mx518 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD 64 3700+ (san diego) ASUS A8N-SLI Premium MSI 7900 GTO 512MB 1gb mushkin high prfrmnce 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
western digital 120gb xp pro DELL!!!! 21" saitek gaming 
PowerCaseMouse
hiper 580w type R aspier x cruiser logitec mx518 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2 of 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by LISTRONICS
I have recently bought a amd athlon 3700 sandiego core and my friend phonx has a venice core 3500. What is the difference between these cores and which is better>>>
San Diego core has twice the L2 cache and is a faster chip. At equal clock speeds, the San Diego will perform a lot better than the Venice. Venice are good overclockers though, so he's not running a horrible chip. You have the better of the 2 chips.
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 2500k Asus P8P67 Galaxy GTX580 8GB G Skill Ripjaws 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Intel 80 gb SSD, Raptor 150 Windows 7 Home Premium 24" Samsung LCD Saitek Eclipse 
PowerCaseMouse
PCP&C 750W Antec P180 Logitech MX-510 blue 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 2500k Asus P8P67 Galaxy GTX580 8GB G Skill Ripjaws 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Intel 80 gb SSD, Raptor 150 Windows 7 Home Premium 24" Samsung LCD Saitek Eclipse 
PowerCaseMouse
PCP&C 750W Antec P180 Logitech MX-510 blue 
  hide details  
Reply
post #3 of 4
The SD core is better it has 1mb of cache as aposed to the Venice having 512kb
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
C2D E6700 "ES" Lapped Gigabyte DQ6 XFX 7950GX2 G.Skill PC6400 2GB-HZ 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
WD Caviar SE16 250GB Microsoft XP / Kubuntu BenQ 20.1 LCD Saitek Eclipse Blue 
PowerCaseMouse
FSP Group FX600-GLN Lian Li PC-7B Logitech G7 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
C2D E6700 "ES" Lapped Gigabyte DQ6 XFX 7950GX2 G.Skill PC6400 2GB-HZ 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
WD Caviar SE16 250GB Microsoft XP / Kubuntu BenQ 20.1 LCD Saitek Eclipse Blue 
PowerCaseMouse
FSP Group FX600-GLN Lian Li PC-7B Logitech G7 
  hide details  
Reply
post #4 of 4
well i know that the san diego is great because i saw some crazy oc with it and great features... but... everyone is talking about the venice and i did see some great oc with it... lol im using clawhammer so...
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardOSPower
AMD Athlon 64 FX-55 DFI LP UT SLI-DR Venus Win XP MCE 2005 OCZ PowerStream SLI 520W 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardOSPower
AMD Athlon 64 FX-55 DFI LP UT SLI-DR Venus Win XP MCE 2005 OCZ PowerStream SLI 520W 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: AMD CPUs
Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD CPUs › san diego core/venice core which is better