Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Hard Drives & Storage › Corsair Nova 32GB SSD vs RAID-0 Samsung F3 1TB (Benchmarks & Pics)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Corsair Nova 32GB SSD vs RAID-0 Samsung F3 1TB (Benchmarks & Pics)

post #1 of 8
Thread Starter 
Introduction
I just got my first SSD, the Corsair Nova 32GB (CSSD-V32GB2-BRKT). Before I got this drive I had two Samsung F3 1TB drives in RAID-0. I thought you guys might like to see the difference in benchmarks and boot-up/shutdown times.





Test Setup
Phenom II X6 1055T 2.8GHz stock (CrystalDiskMark & HD Tune) and 3.6GHz 1.4v OC (Boot/Shutdown)
Tuniq Tower 120 CPU Cooler
Gigabyte GA-890GPA-UD3H 890GX/SB850 AM3 Motherboard
OCZ Platinum 2GB DDR3-1333 Single Stick
Corsair Nova 32GB SSD (29.7GB partition, SATA AHCI) and 2x Samsung F3 1TB (200GB partition, RAID-0)
Asus HD4850 512MB w/ Zalman VF900-Cu
OCZ ModXStream 600W
AZZA Solano 1000 Case

2x Samsung F3 1TB Drives in RAID-0 Installed


Corsair Nova 32GB SSD Installed (There's also a single 1TB F3 that I use for storage but it wasn't tested)




Testing Procedure
Boot-Up and Shutdown Times
The boot-up time was taken from when the power button was pushed to when I could see the desktop wallpaper. The 1055T was at 3.6GHz 1.4v and the RAM was at 1600MHz 8-8-7-15 1T 1.59v for both drives.

CrystalDiskMark 3.0 and HD Tune 2.55
The shutdown time was taken from when the shutdown button was clicked to when the monitor went blank. I ran each bench one time, I don't have the patience for multiple runs. The 1055T was at 2.8GHz stock and the RAM was at 1070MHz 8-8-7-15 1T 1.5v for both drives (I didn't tweak it much since the processor isn't very important for these tests).



Boot-Up and Shutdown Times

Settings


Chart





CrysalDiskMark 3.0


Corsair Nova 32GB SSD Screen Shot


2x Samsung F3 1TB Drives in RAID-0 Screen Shot


Charts










HD Tune 2.55

Corsair Nova 32GB SSD Screen Shot


2x Samsung F3 1TB Drives in RAID-0 Screen Shot


Charts






Conclusion
As my first SSD I am very pleased with it. It's nice that it includes a 2.5" to 3.5" adapter in the box. Along with the OS, I also have Firefox, Microsoft Office 2010, and iTunes installed on it so far. Those programs open much quicker, pretty much instantly, now that they are installed on the SSD. I did some tweaks to free up space like disabling hibernate and moving the virtual memory to my storage drive. I still have about 17.5GB of free space left. Overall this SSD was well worth the upgrade, even from RAID-0 F3s. The boot-up time speaks for itself.
Edited by Ben the OCer - 6/12/10 at 3:10pm
post #2 of 8
Don't forget that just seeing the wallpaper doesn't mean the boot up is complete. You have to consider that applications may be loading still so the system isn't responsive just yet.
Once again...
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 920 [4.28GHz, HT] Asus P6T + Broadcom NetXtreme II VisionTek HD5850 [900/1200] + Galaxy GT240 2x4GB G.Skill Ripjaw X [1632 MHz] 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Intel X25-M 160GB + 3xRAID0 500GB 7200.12 Window 7 Pro 64 Acer H243H + Samsung 226BW XARMOR-U9BL  
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Antec Truepower New 750W Li Lian PC-V2100 [10x120mm fans] Logitech G9 X-Trac Pro 
  hide details  
Reply
Once again...
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 920 [4.28GHz, HT] Asus P6T + Broadcom NetXtreme II VisionTek HD5850 [900/1200] + Galaxy GT240 2x4GB G.Skill Ripjaw X [1632 MHz] 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Intel X25-M 160GB + 3xRAID0 500GB 7200.12 Window 7 Pro 64 Acer H243H + Samsung 226BW XARMOR-U9BL  
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Antec Truepower New 750W Li Lian PC-V2100 [10x120mm fans] Logitech G9 X-Trac Pro 
  hide details  
Reply
post #3 of 8
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by DuckieHo View Post
Don't forget that just seeing the wallpaper doesn't mean the boot up is complete. You have to consider that applications may be loading still so the system isn't responsive just yet.
I know, Duckie, but I needed a repeatable point to stop, that is the easiest one. Otherwise it get's a little too complicated. It's close enough, anyway I did it the same way for both so those numbers are comparable.
post #4 of 8
Nice to see your speeds on your Nova are in line with mine.

:]
post #5 of 8
As usual, a single SSD is hideously fast compared to a single HD. However, when you factor in capacity and price, those Samsungs look incredible.

I'm not so sure about the Crystal Diskmark Seq figures though; are you sure they're correct?
Mythica
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i3 530 Gigabyte GA-H55M-D2H Palit nVidia GT430 Corsair Dominator 4GB TW3X4G1333C9A 
Hard DriveHard DriveOSMonitor
Seagate Barracuda 7200.9 120GB Samsung HD204UI Ubuntu 10.04 LTS HP L1800 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Trust EasyScroll Silverline Corsair HX520 Lian-Li PC-A04B Logitech Trackman Wheel 
  hide details  
Reply
Mythica
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i3 530 Gigabyte GA-H55M-D2H Palit nVidia GT430 Corsair Dominator 4GB TW3X4G1333C9A 
Hard DriveHard DriveOSMonitor
Seagate Barracuda 7200.9 120GB Samsung HD204UI Ubuntu 10.04 LTS HP L1800 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Trust EasyScroll Silverline Corsair HX520 Lian-Li PC-A04B Logitech Trackman Wheel 
  hide details  
Reply
post #6 of 8
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by parityboy View Post
As usual, a single SSD is hideously fast compared to a single HD. However, when you factor in capacity and price, those Samsungs look incredible.

I'm not so sure about the Crystal Diskmark Seq figures though; are you sure they're correct?
Yep, the perfect combination right now is an SSD for the OS and a mechanical hard drive for data storage. You get the best of both worlds that way. Yes the CrystalDiskMark scores are correct. Though there is always a small percentage of error, especially with these hard drive benching programs. What part didn't seem right to you?
post #7 of 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben the OCer View Post
Yep, the perfect combination right now is an SSD for the OS and a mechanical hard drive for data storage. You get the best of both worlds that way. Yes the CrystalDiskMark scores are correct. Though there is always a small percentage of error, especially with these hard drive benching programs. What part didn't seem right to you?
Sorry for the late reply. The first Crystal Diskmark graph - write speeds on rotational media that not only faster than the read speeds on that same media, but are also faster than the write speeds on a SSD?
Mythica
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i3 530 Gigabyte GA-H55M-D2H Palit nVidia GT430 Corsair Dominator 4GB TW3X4G1333C9A 
Hard DriveHard DriveOSMonitor
Seagate Barracuda 7200.9 120GB Samsung HD204UI Ubuntu 10.04 LTS HP L1800 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Trust EasyScroll Silverline Corsair HX520 Lian-Li PC-A04B Logitech Trackman Wheel 
  hide details  
Reply
Mythica
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i3 530 Gigabyte GA-H55M-D2H Palit nVidia GT430 Corsair Dominator 4GB TW3X4G1333C9A 
Hard DriveHard DriveOSMonitor
Seagate Barracuda 7200.9 120GB Samsung HD204UI Ubuntu 10.04 LTS HP L1800 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Trust EasyScroll Silverline Corsair HX520 Lian-Li PC-A04B Logitech Trackman Wheel 
  hide details  
Reply
post #8 of 8
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by parityboy View Post
Sorry for the late reply. The first Crystal Diskmark graph - write speeds on rotational media that not only faster than the read speeds on that same media, but are also faster than the write speeds on a SSD?
Well there is always a margin of error. Though the Samsung F3 1TB does consistently get around the same MB/s sequential read and write speeds. My SSD is kind of low end so it doesn't have the greatest sequential write speeds. It's rated for around 70MB/s so a real would speed of 57MB/s is plausible.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Hard Drives & Storage
Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Hard Drives & Storage › Corsair Nova 32GB SSD vs RAID-0 Samsung F3 1TB (Benchmarks & Pics)