Originally Posted by VulcanDragon
Tut tut, all opinions are valid. Some are just more valid that others.
I get what your saying, don't compare apples to oranges. (Even though I can't figure out what ZH stands for...guess I'm out of the RTS loop.) I am surprised to see these negative opinions about SW:EaW though, the reviews have all been quite positive. I mean, it has to at least be better than Force Commander, right?!?
C&CG Zero Hour is what I meant.
It just seems that alot of arguments I heard are from people who have a strong biased to ZH. So their opinions may not be completely valid, if they are die hard ZH fans, because many people expect games to be remakes of ZH that run on the same engine and they whine if something doesn't play how they like it.
Force Commander did suck, same goes for all previous attempts at SW RTS games, Galactic battlegrounds was nothing more than AoE2 with starwars skins.