Overclock.net › Forums › Benchmarks › Benchmarking Software and Discussion › Post your 3dMark06 scores
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Post your 3dMark06 scores - Page 295

post #2941 of 4458
Finally got around to OC'ing my 9800gx2. Quite happy with my score, could probably OC both GPU and CPU higher though
18740, E3120 @ 4.17Ghz & 9800GX2 @ 675/1100/1688

I don't get the quad core weighting, I get better frame-rates in three out of the four graphics tests when compared to my sig-rig - yet because of the CPU test I'm 1.3k behind.

Having a quad-core shouldn't make 1.5k difference...should it?

Edited by MintMouse - 6/10/09 at 3:43pm
post #2942 of 4458
Quote:
Originally Posted by CL3P20 View Post
still tuning the voltage a bit...on stock cooling with GPU's..

man you need to get a quad for 06
3 Cores of secks
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Phenerom II 720 BE @ 3.7 GHz Gigabyte GA-MA790X-UD4P Asus 5770 V1 Crossfire [2] @ 950/1300 1.175V Patriot 2x1GB DDR2 6400PC2 @ 1066MHz 4-5-5-15 2.2V 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Western Digital Caviar Black 1TB Windows 7 Ultimate 32 bit Samsung 2443 BW Logitech Deluxe 250 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Corsair VX550 CM 690 /w side window MX518 My desk 
  hide details  
Reply
3 Cores of secks
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Phenerom II 720 BE @ 3.7 GHz Gigabyte GA-MA790X-UD4P Asus 5770 V1 Crossfire [2] @ 950/1300 1.175V Patriot 2x1GB DDR2 6400PC2 @ 1066MHz 4-5-5-15 2.2V 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Western Digital Caviar Black 1TB Windows 7 Ultimate 32 bit Samsung 2443 BW Logitech Deluxe 250 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Corsair VX550 CM 690 /w side window MX518 My desk 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2943 of 4458
Quote:
Originally Posted by CupidStunt View Post
Finally got around to OC'ing my 9800gx2. Quite happy with my score, could probably OC both GPU and CPU higher though
18740, E3120 @ 4.17Ghz & 9800GX2 @ 675/1100/1688

I don't get the quad core weighting, I get better frame-rates in three out of the four graphics tests when compared to my sig-rig - yet because of the CPU test I'm 1.3k behind.

Having a quad-core shouldn't make 1.5k difference...should it?
It will make quite a difference.

I went from 11k to 13k with my 9600GT from a 6000+ (3.3 GHz dual) to my 720 BE (3.7 tri core)

Quote:
Originally Posted by im_not_an_artard View Post
i grabbed 11465 w/ one 4850 is that about right?
sounds kinda low
3 Cores of secks
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Phenerom II 720 BE @ 3.7 GHz Gigabyte GA-MA790X-UD4P Asus 5770 V1 Crossfire [2] @ 950/1300 1.175V Patriot 2x1GB DDR2 6400PC2 @ 1066MHz 4-5-5-15 2.2V 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Western Digital Caviar Black 1TB Windows 7 Ultimate 32 bit Samsung 2443 BW Logitech Deluxe 250 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Corsair VX550 CM 690 /w side window MX518 My desk 
  hide details  
Reply
3 Cores of secks
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Phenerom II 720 BE @ 3.7 GHz Gigabyte GA-MA790X-UD4P Asus 5770 V1 Crossfire [2] @ 950/1300 1.175V Patriot 2x1GB DDR2 6400PC2 @ 1066MHz 4-5-5-15 2.2V 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Western Digital Caviar Black 1TB Windows 7 Ultimate 32 bit Samsung 2443 BW Logitech Deluxe 250 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Corsair VX550 CM 690 /w side window MX518 My desk 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2944 of 4458
New score!

not bad for an old fart pc
Animal Mother
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
I7 2600k 4.5Ghz 1.368v  Gigabyte Z68X UD3H B3 ver. 1.3 MSI GTX 780 Ti Twin Frozr IV @ 1180Mhz 16GB Kingston Hyperx Savage 1600Mhz 9.9.9.27 1.5v 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Kingston UV400 240GB SSD, WD 3x640GB, 1TB & 3TB  Noctua NHU12P SE2 w/ KAZE 1200RPM & 1800RPM Windows 10 x64 Samsung P2450H 24" 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Redragon Karuna Corsair TX750W V2 Cooler Master 690 II Advanced Redragon Pegasus 
Mouse PadAudio
SteelSeries QcK XFi Gamer Fatality Pro + Plantronics Gamecom 777 
  hide details  
Reply
Animal Mother
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
I7 2600k 4.5Ghz 1.368v  Gigabyte Z68X UD3H B3 ver. 1.3 MSI GTX 780 Ti Twin Frozr IV @ 1180Mhz 16GB Kingston Hyperx Savage 1600Mhz 9.9.9.27 1.5v 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Kingston UV400 240GB SSD, WD 3x640GB, 1TB & 3TB  Noctua NHU12P SE2 w/ KAZE 1200RPM & 1800RPM Windows 10 x64 Samsung P2450H 24" 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Redragon Karuna Corsair TX750W V2 Cooler Master 690 II Advanced Redragon Pegasus 
Mouse PadAudio
SteelSeries QcK XFi Gamer Fatality Pro + Plantronics Gamecom 777 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2945 of 4458
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bartmasta View Post
It will make quite a difference.

I went from 11k to 13k with my 9600GT from a 6000+ (3.3 GHz dual) to my 720 BE (3.7 tri core)
I know that it does make a big difference, but it shouldn't. The test is flawed, imo.
post #2946 of 4458
Quote:
Originally Posted by CupidStunt View Post
I know that it does make a big difference, but it shouldn't. The test is flawed, imo.
how is it flawed
3 Cores of secks
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Phenerom II 720 BE @ 3.7 GHz Gigabyte GA-MA790X-UD4P Asus 5770 V1 Crossfire [2] @ 950/1300 1.175V Patriot 2x1GB DDR2 6400PC2 @ 1066MHz 4-5-5-15 2.2V 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Western Digital Caviar Black 1TB Windows 7 Ultimate 32 bit Samsung 2443 BW Logitech Deluxe 250 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Corsair VX550 CM 690 /w side window MX518 My desk 
  hide details  
Reply
3 Cores of secks
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Phenerom II 720 BE @ 3.7 GHz Gigabyte GA-MA790X-UD4P Asus 5770 V1 Crossfire [2] @ 950/1300 1.175V Patriot 2x1GB DDR2 6400PC2 @ 1066MHz 4-5-5-15 2.2V 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Western Digital Caviar Black 1TB Windows 7 Ultimate 32 bit Samsung 2443 BW Logitech Deluxe 250 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Corsair VX550 CM 690 /w side window MX518 My desk 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2947 of 4458
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bartmasta View Post
how is it flawed
Well okay, I may have the wrong idea of what it's benching.
I thought it was a test on your computers graphic ability. The CPU test kind of negates it.

The CPU is a factor in the quality of your 3d gaming, but surely a test solely for the CPU warps the final score. It heavily weighs to quads when they aren't much better than duals in current games. It's not a real "overall measure of your system’s 3D gaming capabilities", as futuremark say, in my opinion.
post #2948 of 4458
it is more the amount of data that the CPU can feed the cards is the CPU factor in the games tests.
The quads make up heaps in the CPU sections as they can do many more calculations in the same time as the duals
My System
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 4771 GA-Z87X-UD3H 2*HD5850 4gb G.Skill Ripjaw + 8gb Corsair XMS3 1600 cl8 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Samsung 840 Pro 256gb | 3*3TB Raid 5 | Corsair F60 Windows 8 x64 *EYEFINITY* Dell 2405FPW + 2*E248WFP Logitech Illuminated 
PowerCaseMouseAudio
Corsair HX-850v2 Lian Li v2010b M$ Basic  Asus Xonar D2X 
AudioAudio
Swan D1080 MK II 08  Shure SRH-440 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 4771 GA-Z87X-UD3H 2*HD5850 4gb G.Skill Ripjaw + 8gb Corsair XMS3 1600 cl8 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Samsung 840 Pro 256gb | 3*3TB Raid 5 | Corsair F60 Windows 8 x64 *EYEFINITY* Dell 2405FPW + 2*E248WFP Logitech Illuminated 
PowerCaseMouseAudio
Corsair HX-850v2 Lian Li v2010b M$ Basic  Asus Xonar D2X 
AudioAudio
Swan D1080 MK II 08  Shure SRH-440 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2949 of 4458
Quote:
Originally Posted by CupidStunt View Post
Well okay, I may have the wrong idea of what it's benching.
I thought it was a test on your computers graphic ability. The CPU test kind of negates it.

The CPU is a factor in the quality of your 3d gaming, but surely a test solely for the CPU warps the final score. It heavily weighs to quads when they aren't much better than duals in current games. It's not a real "overall measure of your system’s 3D gaming capabilities", as futuremark say, in my opinion.
well the problem with 3dmark06 is that the cpu score has too much effect on the final score

thats the deal with most gfx benchmarks though
3 Cores of secks
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Phenerom II 720 BE @ 3.7 GHz Gigabyte GA-MA790X-UD4P Asus 5770 V1 Crossfire [2] @ 950/1300 1.175V Patriot 2x1GB DDR2 6400PC2 @ 1066MHz 4-5-5-15 2.2V 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Western Digital Caviar Black 1TB Windows 7 Ultimate 32 bit Samsung 2443 BW Logitech Deluxe 250 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Corsair VX550 CM 690 /w side window MX518 My desk 
  hide details  
Reply
3 Cores of secks
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Phenerom II 720 BE @ 3.7 GHz Gigabyte GA-MA790X-UD4P Asus 5770 V1 Crossfire [2] @ 950/1300 1.175V Patriot 2x1GB DDR2 6400PC2 @ 1066MHz 4-5-5-15 2.2V 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Western Digital Caviar Black 1TB Windows 7 Ultimate 32 bit Samsung 2443 BW Logitech Deluxe 250 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Corsair VX550 CM 690 /w side window MX518 My desk 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2950 of 4458
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottath View Post
The quads make up heaps in the CPU sections as they can do many more calculations in the same time as the duals
Exactly. They are not indicative of your PCs gaming ability.

E.g. If some academic wanted to do a scientific study of gaming performance, he would find the scores of any 3dmark06 default runs invalid. Take away the CPU tests and you have qualifiable benchmarks.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
Overclock.net › Forums › Benchmarks › Benchmarking Software and Discussion › Post your 3dMark06 scores