Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › Criticism over Conroe benchmarks
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Criticism over Conroe benchmarks - Page 3  

post #21 of 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShawnMcGrail
Yeah? And?

The likelyness that the FX-60 will beat the Conroe is slim to none, Close a the gap a bit, Definatly, But beating it...

Therefor, It makes perfect sense when all the AMD fan-boys start with this.

At first it was, "Ah crap... we got beat, Dammit, poop, rgggggg..."

Now that they want to argue that its ill-legitimate, "OMGZORZ ITS T3H FAKE!!!!! WE HAVE TO COMPLAIN UNTIL WE GET IT OUR WAY!!!!!"

The likelyness of having a completely legitimate review is impossible... End of story...

And "Little YTMND thing", over 100,000 users is little? Since when?
Ehm. No. It may not beat it, but my guess is it will close the gap considerably. And what about complaining? Its not legit FX-60 results, so nothing can be proven until results are out. And the "little YTMND thing" is little.. Literally. It takes up barely anyroom on my monitor .

But just to add your saying a legitimate review is impossible? Why is that? Because there are no honest people in this world or something? But it is possible, so.. Yeah..
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Athlon 3600+ X2 Biostar Tforce 550 BFG 7600GT OC Corsair XMS DDR675 2x1024 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
WD 160GB + WD 80GB SATA Windows XP Pro Compaq MV720 Logitech 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
FSP FX600-GLN Aspire X-Cruiser Black Razer Copperhead Tempest Ratzpad GS 
  hide details  
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Athlon 3600+ X2 Biostar Tforce 550 BFG 7600GT OC Corsair XMS DDR675 2x1024 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
WD 160GB + WD 80GB SATA Windows XP Pro Compaq MV720 Logitech 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
FSP FX600-GLN Aspire X-Cruiser Black Razer Copperhead Tempest Ratzpad GS 
  hide details  
post #22 of 24
How about the the whole fanboy ppl calm down... The fact is that even if the comparisons are not right and the FX-60 is faster then the conros is still a friggin fast chip no matter what, we just dont have a proper AMD comparison to go with... Well done to intel for the Conroe and well done to AMD for the FX-60
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel C2Q QX9650 Gigabye GA-X38-DQ6 2 x ATI HD3870 Water Cooled 2gb Ballistix Tracers 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
Raptor Win XP Viewsonic 22" OCZ 720w 
Case
Coolermaster Centurion 
  hide details  
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel C2Q QX9650 Gigabye GA-X38-DQ6 2 x ATI HD3870 Water Cooled 2gb Ballistix Tracers 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
Raptor Win XP Viewsonic 22" OCZ 720w 
Case
Coolermaster Centurion 
  hide details  
post #23 of 24
well if il find in the middle of the street any one of them... i wont leave it
both of them are MONSTERS! or BEASTS!
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardOSPower
AMD Athlon 64 FX-55 DFI LP UT SLI-DR Venus Win XP MCE 2005 OCZ PowerStream SLI 520W 
  hide details  
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardOSPower
AMD Athlon 64 FX-55 DFI LP UT SLI-DR Venus Win XP MCE 2005 OCZ PowerStream SLI 520W 
  hide details  
post #24 of 24
Thread Starter 
Intel shows off new core. Claims to beat AMD by a significant margin. Claim disputed, possibly a valid dispute. Who knows - we will have to wait until Conroe is in the hands of real people.

End of story.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Hardware News
This thread is locked  
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › Criticism over Conroe benchmarks