well i love those facts which were stated . keep them coming .
as far as the 3 channel memory goes i know a benchmark is synthetic but in max mem my amd rig vs hazed intel rig his scores were higher and his fathers i7 930 scores were verry nice but mainly due to the extra 2 gigs .
tests were run using same ram and same timings same clocks the triple chanel was better but also more expensive.
and thank you thats all i was trying to say about the cpu side of things . i wasnt trying to bash amd or hurt fanboys feelings .
i am a fan of raw power and who ever delivers the power.however with said my amd 555 be is powerful as a dual or a quad to an extent,but there is just some things it cant do and i blame software on that ,but more cores would help .
but as far as the coment that intel wont release an 8 core anytime soon i wouldn't bet on it,as bulldozer is being created ,i am sure intel is hard at work as well.
at any rate im keeping my fingers crossed for bulldozer to surpass my expectations,as im sure it will.
as far as the 3 channel memory goes i know a benchmark is synthetic but in max mem my amd rig vs hazed intel rig his scores were higher and his fathers i7 930 scores were verry nice but mainly due to the extra 2 gigs .
tests were run using same ram and same timings same clocks the triple chanel was better but also more expensive.
and thank you thats all i was trying to say about the cpu side of things . i wasnt trying to bash amd or hurt fanboys feelings .
i am a fan of raw power and who ever delivers the power.however with said my amd 555 be is powerful as a dual or a quad to an extent,but there is just some things it cant do and i blame software on that ,but more cores would help .
but as far as the coment that intel wont release an 8 core anytime soon i wouldn't bet on it,as bulldozer is being created ,i am sure intel is hard at work as well.
at any rate im keeping my fingers crossed for bulldozer to surpass my expectations,as im sure it will.








