Overclock.net › Forums › General Hardware › General Processor Discussions › Nanometer processor to picometer processor
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Nanometer processor to picometer processor

post #1 of 12
Thread Starter 
So I started thinking the first nanometer processors were introduced about 6 years ago at a nice whopping 90nm if I can recall right and 6 years later we have gone all the way down to 32nm and rapidly approaching 22nm and smaller. So what happens when we get to 1nm size processors? Well we get to the picometer. Is making a proccesor with a lets say 90picometer or 90pm process technology even possible? If so how long do you think until we start seeing them? Less than 5 years? 5 years? 10 years?

Disclaimer: Sorry if I sound retarded these small scales I'm not familiar with.
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 920 D0 @ 4.0Ghz Asus P6T 2x Sapphire Radeon HD 5850 1GB DDR5 G.Skill 3x2GB DDR3 1600 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
Western Digital 1TB Caviar Black Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit LG 30" 2560x1600 Corsair TX750 watt 
Case
Haf 932 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 920 D0 @ 4.0Ghz Asus P6T 2x Sapphire Radeon HD 5850 1GB DDR5 G.Skill 3x2GB DDR3 1600 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
Western Digital 1TB Caviar Black Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit LG 30" 2560x1600 Corsair TX750 watt 
Case
Haf 932 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2 of 12
I personally think we are reaching physical limits at like 22nm>X>5nm. This is a big question that only patience can answer.
TaXx
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II X4 955 BE @ 3.8 24/7 Asus M4A78T-E EVGA GTX 480 Corsair XMS3 DDR3 @ 1700 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Intel X25-M G2 80gb 2xWD Cav. Black 1TB (RAID0) Samsung something Windows 7 x64 Samsung P2270 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G11 Antec TP 650W Antec 902 Logitech G9 
  hide details  
Reply
TaXx
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II X4 955 BE @ 3.8 24/7 Asus M4A78T-E EVGA GTX 480 Corsair XMS3 DDR3 @ 1700 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Intel X25-M G2 80gb 2xWD Cav. Black 1TB (RAID0) Samsung something Windows 7 x64 Samsung P2270 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G11 Antec TP 650W Antec 902 Logitech G9 
  hide details  
Reply
post #3 of 12
according to moores law and intel it should be within the next decade
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i3 540 @ 4.5 GHz ASUS Maximus III Gene ASUS ENGTX460 DirectCU 1GB @ 900MHz in SLI G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) 1600 MHz 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
1TB Windows 7 Ultimate x64 Acer p243w G15 
PowerCaseMouse
TX850W HAF X Razer Mamba 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i3 540 @ 4.5 GHz ASUS Maximus III Gene ASUS ENGTX460 DirectCU 1GB @ 900MHz in SLI G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) 1600 MHz 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
1TB Windows 7 Ultimate x64 Acer p243w G15 
PowerCaseMouse
TX850W HAF X Razer Mamba 
  hide details  
Reply
post #4 of 12
sounds logical
Ballin Outrageous
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II 1055t GIGABYTE GA-MA790XT-UD4P MSI HD7850 TFIII 2x4GB Samsung M378B5273DH0-YK0 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
WD Black 640GB Crucial M4 64GB Xigmatek HDT S-1283 + ScytheKaze 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
ASUS VK246H Logitech Access Antec TruePower 550 Antec 300 
Mouse
Logitech Optical 
  hide details  
Reply
Ballin Outrageous
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II 1055t GIGABYTE GA-MA790XT-UD4P MSI HD7850 TFIII 2x4GB Samsung M378B5273DH0-YK0 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
WD Black 640GB Crucial M4 64GB Xigmatek HDT S-1283 + ScytheKaze 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
ASUS VK246H Logitech Access Antec TruePower 550 Antec 300 
Mouse
Logitech Optical 
  hide details  
Reply
post #5 of 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by roberts91 View Post
So I started thinking the first nanometer processors were introduced about 6 years ago at a nice whopping 90nm if I can recall right and 6 years later we have gone all the way down to 32nm and rapidly approaching 22nm and smaller. So what happens when we get to 1nm size processors? Well we get to the picometer. Is making a proccesor with a lets say 90picometer or 90pm process technology even possible? If so how long do you think until we start seeing them? Less than 5 years? 5 years? 10 years?

Disclaimer: Sorry if I sound retarded these small scales I'm not familiar with.
22nm they will just call it

220 picometer
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
None Installed Iwill DPK66S  Dual 8800 GT SLI None installed 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
250 GB Western Digital DVD-Burner N/A NONE 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
N/A 610 PPC Thermaltake Armor  N/A 
Mouse PadAudio
N/A None installed 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
None Installed Iwill DPK66S  Dual 8800 GT SLI None installed 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
250 GB Western Digital DVD-Burner N/A NONE 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
N/A 610 PPC Thermaltake Armor  N/A 
Mouse PadAudio
N/A None installed 
  hide details  
Reply
post #6 of 12
I'm not an engineer, but we've seen how fragile the 32nm processors are. 22nm will probably be made of glass and toothpicks, and anything under that is probably beyond the physical limit.

Personally, I think we'll see a completely new type of processor before we see a 90pm processor.


Oh, and, side note - Moore's "law" is such BS. It's not a law at all, just speculation.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 2500k (4.5ghz@1.336v) ASRock P67 Extreme4 SLI Gigabyte GTX470 (800c/1740m) G.Skill Ripjaws 2x2GB 1600 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
G.Skill Phoenix Pro 60gb + WD Caviar Blue 320gb ASUS DVD-RW Windows 7 64bit 22" Acer x223w 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Blackwidow Ultimate Seasonic X650 CM Storm Scout Logitech G400 
Mouse Pad
are you kidding? 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 2500k (4.5ghz@1.336v) ASRock P67 Extreme4 SLI Gigabyte GTX470 (800c/1740m) G.Skill Ripjaws 2x2GB 1600 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
G.Skill Phoenix Pro 60gb + WD Caviar Blue 320gb ASUS DVD-RW Windows 7 64bit 22" Acer x223w 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Blackwidow Ultimate Seasonic X650 CM Storm Scout Logitech G400 
Mouse Pad
are you kidding? 
  hide details  
Reply
post #7 of 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by ayeyo View Post
i'm not an engineer, but we've seen how fragile the 32nm processors are. 22nm will probably be made of glass and toothpicks, and anything under that is probably beyond the physical limit.

Personally, i think we'll see a completely new type of processor before we see a 90pm processor.


Oh, and, side note - moore's "law" is such bs. It's not a law at all, just speculation.
this ^^^^
TaXx
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II X4 955 BE @ 3.8 24/7 Asus M4A78T-E EVGA GTX 480 Corsair XMS3 DDR3 @ 1700 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Intel X25-M G2 80gb 2xWD Cav. Black 1TB (RAID0) Samsung something Windows 7 x64 Samsung P2270 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G11 Antec TP 650W Antec 902 Logitech G9 
  hide details  
Reply
TaXx
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II X4 955 BE @ 3.8 24/7 Asus M4A78T-E EVGA GTX 480 Corsair XMS3 DDR3 @ 1700 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Intel X25-M G2 80gb 2xWD Cav. Black 1TB (RAID0) Samsung something Windows 7 x64 Samsung P2270 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G11 Antec TP 650W Antec 902 Logitech G9 
  hide details  
Reply
post #8 of 12
Biggest problem is heat. You could make it smaller true, but it could become as hot as the exhaust from a rocket.

EDIT: I agree with AyeYo as well. A new design/type of processor will probably come out before it get smaller.
Edited by Sneaky07 - 8/16/10 at 6:29pm
Gaming/Folding
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7-860 ASUS P7P55D-E Pro XFX Radeon HD 5870 4GB DDR3 GSkill Ripjaws 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
1TB 7200RPM WD Samsung Blu-ray Combo Windows 7 64-bit Samsung SyncMaster T260HD 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech Wireless PC Power and Cooling Silencer MK II 750W Cooler Master HAF 932 Logitech Wireless 
Mouse Pad
Red Wings 
  hide details  
Reply
Gaming/Folding
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7-860 ASUS P7P55D-E Pro XFX Radeon HD 5870 4GB DDR3 GSkill Ripjaws 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
1TB 7200RPM WD Samsung Blu-ray Combo Windows 7 64-bit Samsung SyncMaster T260HD 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech Wireless PC Power and Cooling Silencer MK II 750W Cooler Master HAF 932 Logitech Wireless 
Mouse Pad
Red Wings 
  hide details  
Reply
post #9 of 12
What I don't understand is why there's such reluctance towards making the die bigger. I understand the benefits of making the process smaller, but there has to be a limit somewhere, and it would seem easier/more cost effective to just make the die bigger. Who's idea was it to have this completely arbitrary general die size and attempt to always stuff more transistors onto it?

If you have a 5mm x 5mm die with 500 million 90nm transistors, you can either halve the process size to 45nm to get 1 billion transistors or you could just double the die size to 10mm x 10mm... Aside from heat and power consumption, why wouldn't that work?
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 2500k (4.5ghz@1.336v) ASRock P67 Extreme4 SLI Gigabyte GTX470 (800c/1740m) G.Skill Ripjaws 2x2GB 1600 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
G.Skill Phoenix Pro 60gb + WD Caviar Blue 320gb ASUS DVD-RW Windows 7 64bit 22" Acer x223w 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Blackwidow Ultimate Seasonic X650 CM Storm Scout Logitech G400 
Mouse Pad
are you kidding? 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 2500k (4.5ghz@1.336v) ASRock P67 Extreme4 SLI Gigabyte GTX470 (800c/1740m) G.Skill Ripjaws 2x2GB 1600 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
G.Skill Phoenix Pro 60gb + WD Caviar Blue 320gb ASUS DVD-RW Windows 7 64bit 22" Acer x223w 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Blackwidow Ultimate Seasonic X650 CM Storm Scout Logitech G400 
Mouse Pad
are you kidding? 
  hide details  
Reply
post #10 of 12
We are reaching nm boundaries. 22/16/11nm will probably be the end.


To answer ayeyo's question, people always want smaller. Till we find out how small we can make chips, we wont really increase the size of them.
It's TURBO TIME!
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 2500k [Asus P8P67 PRO] ATI 5770 [8GB G.Skill Ripjaws DDR3-1333][7-7-7-21@1.5v] 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
[Spinpoint F3 1TB] Corsair H-60 [Windows 7 Ultimate x64] [22in Asus 2ms 1920x1080] 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Walmart POS [Hiper 880w] [NZXT M59] Razer DeathAdder 
  hide details  
Reply
It's TURBO TIME!
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 2500k [Asus P8P67 PRO] ATI 5770 [8GB G.Skill Ripjaws DDR3-1333][7-7-7-21@1.5v] 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
[Spinpoint F3 1TB] Corsair H-60 [Windows 7 Ultimate x64] [22in Asus 2ms 1920x1080] 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Walmart POS [Hiper 880w] [NZXT M59] Razer DeathAdder 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: General Processor Discussions
Overclock.net › Forums › General Hardware › General Processor Discussions › Nanometer processor to picometer processor