Overclock.net › Forums › Cooling › Water Cooling › The importance of the "order" of your loop?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

# The importance of the "order" of your loop? - Page 5

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Nordar I think most people agree that there is a difference in temperature between the input and output of radiator. The question is just how much of a difference is there and how does it affect our system? That is why I in my previous post in this thread wrote that there is hardly any difference because my stance on the subject is that the difference is small and in fact so small that it should not be the dictating factor when deciding loop order. The following link is to a test that to the best of my understanding empericaly shows that loop order is insignificant: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...ght=Loop+order /Nordar
+1 rep for the time and the link.
Quote:
Your pretty well right on for a theoretical loop, using my cheat I came out about the same....Heat Transfer (Q = m * c * dT) Equation Solver/Calculator

That would be a static loop with no other variables that would dissipate a set amount of heat dump, with a static heat source.

A real loop would have a lot of variables, convective heat ransfer, thermal coefficients in the heat exchanger and blocks (WMK of materials and thickness) pressure and viscosity changes with temp's, coolants...etc...

But I pretty well agree with what you have there.

Quote:
 Conclusion: From the above (and assuming I made no mistakes in my application of the formula) I personally conclude: There is a difference. However, it is small. The difference in input/output is not enough for me (even for a big system) to dictate loop order. I would personally prefer tidyness, simplicty and reduced tubing (easier to bleed, fill, drain...). Also look at what happens if you spread out the radiators (typically 1 before CPU, 1 after CPU) between each block. Then the radiators share the work of removing the heat and the difference in input/output temperature of EACH radiator will be less. A good question now is: What does a 1C improvement in water temperature do to the CPU tempeature. My guess is very little - a guess that is backed up by the people who says they tried different loop orders without any change in CPU temperature. If one insists on the importance of loop order the above indicates you should put all radiators in series and place them right in front of the CPU to get biggest temperature drop before the water hits the CPU block.
1- A small difference, as I would agree I wouldn't run much extra tubing to get one in that config, although tubing frictional losses are almost nill till you get ridiculous amounts of tubing strung out around the room.

2- Your opinion, which is fine, it's a free country. But opinion is opinion, it may be a fact to the individual that gives their opinion, but that does not make it fact.

3-Agree entirely, placing rad's between components is a waste of time and effort.

4-Not really a lot, I don't think anyone here has said it does. But then again your talking about the most critical measurement, other then actual CPU temp, in a loop.

That would be your rad out to ambient DeltaT. A 10C rad out is close to being no better then a HSF. A 5C rad out delta will let yo make some pretty good OC'es. So 1C in my estimation would be 20% of the cooling potential between that 5C rad out and 10C rad out.

My opinion, I like to OC so I take any advantage I can, especially free ones. There are a lot of little tweaks to optimize a loop. I actually try to stay well under a 5C rad out DeltaT.

But everyone is different and WC for various reasons. If I was doing it for quiet I wouldn't worry about even a 10C rad out to much.

I've set up 100's of loops in many configurations and I always got a little better temp's with the CPU right after the rad. That includes extremely restrictive jet blocks which I thought should cool better if I put them right after the pump from the increased head and flow.

Quote:
 The following link is to a test that to the best of my understanding empericaly shows that loop order is insignificant: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...ght=Loop+order

I would hardly call that empirical at all, there are a couple of flaws in it.

First he's using the Swiftech rad, which is a low fin per inch rad designed for low cfm fans 50-60cfm, they will keep cooling with more cfm but the cooling curve will flatten out big time. He's using 100cfm fans on it, which the rad was never designed to be used with.

The second flaw is stacking his rad's, that has never worked as well as having the rad's separate, the second rad will be pulling several C hotter air through it then the first.

If he had used a rad that is designed for higher pressure and cfm fans he may of gotten a little better temp's.

Did he get banned for trying it rip off the HWBot along with Skinnee in the MSI Lords of Overclocking OC'ing competition? Someone said he did but I've not seen it myself.

Skinnee is in this...
HWBOT response to FM LOC incident
 My System (13 items)
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E8600 4545Mhz*9 w/1.29V DFI DK P45 XFX 8800 GS D9GKX & D9GMH
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSPower
2x Seagate 160 Perp. RD-1 2x Asus Vista Premium Corsair HX 620
Case
Open Bench
 My System (13 items)
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E8600 4545Mhz*9 w/1.29V DFI DK P45 XFX 8800 GS D9GKX & D9GMH
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSPower
2x Seagate 160 Perp. RD-1 2x Asus Vista Premium Corsair HX 620
Case
Open Bench
Quote:
 Originally Posted by ira-k The second flaw is stacking his rad's, that has never worked as well as having the rad's separate, the second rad will be pulling several C hotter air through it then the first.
This is pretty much the exact argument I was making against having your devices daisy chained together in the loop like... CPU-GPU1-GPU2-GPU3 without a rad in between somewhere.

What is the difference between "several C hotter air" and "several C hotter water" ?
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Lucretius This is pretty much the exact argument I was making against having your devices daisy chained together in the loop like... CPU-GPU1-GPU2-GPU3 without a rad in between somewhere. What is the difference between "several C hotter air" and "several C hotter water" ?
With all else being equal the radiators will remove exactly the same amount of heat as added by the components being cooled (in the equilibrium state). This is independent on where in the loop they are placed.

The heat transfer capacity of the radiators will of course depent on the difference between the water temperature and the air pull through them (and hence potential be able to lower the equilibrium temperature). However, as shown above the temperature drop over the radiator is very little so I doubt it will be of great influence. The air pulled through a set of stacked radiators will change temperature much faster because the specific heat (heat capacity) of air is about 1/4 of that of water but more importantly because air weighs much less than water (however, a higher air flow work in the other direction).

So the air in stacked radiators will change temperature a good bit while the water over a series of radiators won't. That is why stacked radiators loose efficiency but radiators in series do not.

For the very OC fixated benchmarker the best bet is to run all the radiators in series in order to maximize the temperature drop over the radiators and then place the CPU after the radiator because it will be the most heat critical part. However, as proven above the effect is small.

I hope I made sense .

/Nordar
Edited by Nordar - 8/23/10 at 5:01am
 My System (17 items)
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
6700k I7 Asus Hero VIII MSI 980Ti 16GB 3200 DDR4
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Intel 750 400GB  OCZ Vertex 2 100GB  HGST Deststar 4TB WD Caviar Black 2 TB
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
XSPC Rads, EKWB blocks, Gentle Typhoons Win 10, Pro 64 bit Dell 27", 1440P Das Keyboard
PowerCase
Silverstone Strider ST-1500 Lian Li PC-A77B
 My System (17 items)
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
6700k I7 Asus Hero VIII MSI 980Ti 16GB 3200 DDR4
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Intel 750 400GB  OCZ Vertex 2 100GB  HGST Deststar 4TB WD Caviar Black 2 TB
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
XSPC Rads, EKWB blocks, Gentle Typhoons Win 10, Pro 64 bit Dell 27", 1440P Das Keyboard
PowerCase
Silverstone Strider ST-1500 Lian Li PC-A77B
Quote:
 Originally Posted by ira-k Your pretty well right on for a theoretical loop, using my cheat I came out about the same....Heat Transfer (Q = m * c * dT) Equation Solver/Calculator That would be a static loop with no other variables that would dissipate a set amount of heat dump, with a static heat source. A real loop would have a lot of variables, convective heat ransfer, thermal coefficients in the heat exchanger and blocks (WMK of materials and thickness) pressure and viscosity changes with temp's, coolants...etc... But I pretty well agree with what you have there.
I agree with you as well that the calculations based on the heat transfer equation is simplified. However, the other factors you mention only have little effect and the effect they have will all work towards reducing the temperature drop (in equilbrium). For instance the tubing and resevoir will work as passive radiators.

Quote:
 Originally Posted by ira-k That would be your rad out to ambient DeltaT. A 10C rad out is close to being no better then a HSF. A 5C rad out delta will let yo make some pretty good OC'es. So 1C in my estimation would be 20% of the cooling potential between that 5C rad out and 10C rad out. My opinion, I like to OC so I take any advantage I can, especially free ones. There are a lot of little tweaks to optimize a loop. I actually try to stay well under a 5C rad out DeltaT. But everyone is different and WC for various reasons. If I was doing it for quiet I wouldn't worry about even a 10C rad out to much.
I admit that I am borderlining my understanding of physics (but that just makes it more interesting). So do take my posts as an attempt to learn.

I was under the assumption that for most radiator tests the water to air delta shown are based on average temperature of the water in the loop (and not rad out water temp). If this is the case is it then possible to compare the 1C temperature drop presented in my calculations above with a 5C delta (for instance)? The average water temperature in the loop is pretty much independent on the radiator placement in the loop.

Quote:
 Originally Posted by ira-k I've set up 100's of loops in many configurations and I always got a little better temp's with the CPU right after the rad. That includes extremely restrictive jet blocks which I thought should cool better if I put them right after the pump from the increased head and flow.

This is very interesting (especially for the serious benchmarker) and is a different experience than posted by others in this thread (that state they do not experience any difference in CPU temp using different loop orders). Maybe it's only measurable at extreme overclocks? or so small an effect that it is hard to meassure? Anyways it encourages one to experiment. .

Quote:
 Originally Posted by ira-k I would hardly call that empirical at all, there are a couple of flaws in it. First he's using the Swiftech rad, which is a low fin per inch rad designed for low cfm fans 50-60cfm, they will keep cooling with more cfm but the cooling curve will flatten out big time. He's using 100cfm fans on it, which the rad was never designed to be used with. The second flaw is stacking his rad's, that has never worked as well as having the rad's separate, the second rad will be pulling several C hotter air through it then the first. If he had used a rad that is designed for higher pressure and cfm fans he may of gotten a little better temp's.
I understand your points but it is I believe the only test available that looks into this matter and even though not conducted using an ideal test setup it still points in the direction that the temperature drop over a radiator is small which the theory backs up.

/Nordar
 My System (17 items)
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
6700k I7 Asus Hero VIII MSI 980Ti 16GB 3200 DDR4
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Intel 750 400GB  OCZ Vertex 2 100GB  HGST Deststar 4TB WD Caviar Black 2 TB
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
XSPC Rads, EKWB blocks, Gentle Typhoons Win 10, Pro 64 bit Dell 27", 1440P Das Keyboard
PowerCase
Silverstone Strider ST-1500 Lian Li PC-A77B
 My System (17 items)
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
6700k I7 Asus Hero VIII MSI 980Ti 16GB 3200 DDR4
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Intel 750 400GB  OCZ Vertex 2 100GB  HGST Deststar 4TB WD Caviar Black 2 TB
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
XSPC Rads, EKWB blocks, Gentle Typhoons Win 10, Pro 64 bit Dell 27", 1440P Das Keyboard
PowerCase
Silverstone Strider ST-1500 Lian Li PC-A77B
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Nordar This is very interesting (especially for the serious benchmarker) and is a different experience than posted by others in this thread (that state they do not experience any difference in CPU temp using different loop orders). Maybe it's only measurable at extreme overclocks? or so small an effect that it is hard to meassure? Anyways it encourages one to experiment. . /Nordar
\$20 says Ira had a probe hooked up to the CPU and wasn't using some type of software monitoring.

My understanding of physics is also limited but if I am understanding everything, the bottom line is, there is a difference and it is beneficial, no matter how small the benefit is. Just because it can't be measured in units of 1C or larger doesn't mean anything. .01C could be an extra 10mhz out of my CPU.

IIRC there is something somewhere that describes what you are supposed to do to accurately measure your CPU temp. It involves carving a channel in the CPU IHS and placing a probe there.
Edited by Shrimpykins - 8/23/10 at 9:12am
 Teh Inturwebz Mahsheen (18 items) Project Al (69 photos)
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 2700k Gigabyte UD4 MSI 580GTX Lightning Xtreme Edition 3GB 2x4GB G.Skill @ 1600mhz CL6
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveOS
OCZ Vertex II SSD OCZ Vertex II SSD LG Blu-Ray/HD-DVD Combo Drive Win 7 Ult
MonitorMonitorKeyboardPower
Achieva Shimian Acer G235H XArmor U9BL Corsair HX1000W
Fractal Define R3 Silver Arrow Razer Naga Ultimate Razer Goliathus Speed Edition Polk Audio RTi-A1
AudioAudio
Dayton Audio DTA-100a Asus Xonar STX
 Teh Inturwebz Mahsheen (18 items) Project Al (69 photos)
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 2700k Gigabyte UD4 MSI 580GTX Lightning Xtreme Edition 3GB 2x4GB G.Skill @ 1600mhz CL6
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveOS
OCZ Vertex II SSD OCZ Vertex II SSD LG Blu-Ray/HD-DVD Combo Drive Win 7 Ult
MonitorMonitorKeyboardPower
Achieva Shimian Acer G235H XArmor U9BL Corsair HX1000W
Fractal Define R3 Silver Arrow Razer Naga Ultimate Razer Goliathus Speed Edition Polk Audio RTi-A1
AudioAudio
Dayton Audio DTA-100a Asus Xonar STX
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Shrimpykins \$20 says Ira had a probe hooked up to the CPU and wasn't using some type of software monitoring. My understanding of physics is also limited but if I am understanding everything, the bottom line is, there is a difference and it is beneficial, no matter how small the benefit is. Just because it can't be measured in units of 1C or larger doesn't mean anything. .01C could be an extra 10mhz out of my CPU. IIRC there is something somewhere that describes what you are supposed to do to accurately measure your CPU temp. It involves carving a channel in the CPU IHS and placing a probe there.
If it can't be measured in 1C or larger, is it really worth it? If it requires extra tubing and more bending (possibly rotary fittings), wouldn't it be better to just make the simplest loop possible? If we are talking about less than 1C, then I'm certainly not going to make my loop more complicated to ascertain it.
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Corrupted If it can't be measured in 1C or larger, is it really worth it? If it requires extra tubing and more bending (possibly rotary fittings), wouldn't it be better to just make the simplest loop possible? If we are talking about less than 1C, then I'm certainly not going to make my loop more complicated to ascertain it.
That completely up to opinion. I have my rad right before my CPU and will have another radiator right before my GPU's and the tubing isn't that complicated IMO.
 Teh Inturwebz Mahsheen (18 items) Project Al (69 photos)
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 2700k Gigabyte UD4 MSI 580GTX Lightning Xtreme Edition 3GB 2x4GB G.Skill @ 1600mhz CL6
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveOS
OCZ Vertex II SSD OCZ Vertex II SSD LG Blu-Ray/HD-DVD Combo Drive Win 7 Ult
MonitorMonitorKeyboardPower
Achieva Shimian Acer G235H XArmor U9BL Corsair HX1000W
Fractal Define R3 Silver Arrow Razer Naga Ultimate Razer Goliathus Speed Edition Polk Audio RTi-A1
AudioAudio
Dayton Audio DTA-100a Asus Xonar STX
 Teh Inturwebz Mahsheen (18 items) Project Al (69 photos)
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 2700k Gigabyte UD4 MSI 580GTX Lightning Xtreme Edition 3GB 2x4GB G.Skill @ 1600mhz CL6
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveOS
OCZ Vertex II SSD OCZ Vertex II SSD LG Blu-Ray/HD-DVD Combo Drive Win 7 Ult
MonitorMonitorKeyboardPower
Achieva Shimian Acer G235H XArmor U9BL Corsair HX1000W
Fractal Define R3 Silver Arrow Razer Naga Ultimate Razer Goliathus Speed Edition Polk Audio RTi-A1
AudioAudio
Dayton Audio DTA-100a Asus Xonar STX
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Shrimpykins That completely up to opinion. I have my rad right before my CPU and will have another radiator right before my GPU's and the tubing isn't that complicated IMO.
I'm going to have it the same way...however getting the better rad to be before the CPU rather than GPU would require a lot more length and a much less clean look in the case.
As mentioned before each to his own. Some see benefit in maximum performance at the potential cost in looks and increased complexity of the tubing. Others see benefit in clean looks and potential minimal tubing which could provide easier filling and bleeding. Either way the difference is small and down to preference.

Personally I will go for clean looks. In my current build I think I actually might end up with res->pump->gfx 1 + gfx 2 (parallel) -> Mostfet 1 -> NB/SB -> CPU -> Mosfet 2 -> radiator 360 -> radiator 240 -> res. I think it will do well anyways even with a decent 4.0-4.2 24/7 OC on my I7 930. I am not into benchmarking.

IF I where to go for maximum performance I would go res -> pump -> radiator 1 -> radiator 2 -> cpu -> the rest...

This would provide maximum temperature drop over the radiators before the water hits the CPU. The CPU with a 150 Watt output or so would only heat the water by about 0.25 degrees with a 2 GPM flow so no need for radiator after CPU.

Thats what I (currently) believe.

/Nordar
 My System (17 items)
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
6700k I7 Asus Hero VIII MSI 980Ti 16GB 3200 DDR4
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Intel 750 400GB  OCZ Vertex 2 100GB  HGST Deststar 4TB WD Caviar Black 2 TB
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
XSPC Rads, EKWB blocks, Gentle Typhoons Win 10, Pro 64 bit Dell 27", 1440P Das Keyboard
PowerCase
Silverstone Strider ST-1500 Lian Li PC-A77B
 My System (17 items)
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
6700k I7 Asus Hero VIII MSI 980Ti 16GB 3200 DDR4
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Intel 750 400GB  OCZ Vertex 2 100GB  HGST Deststar 4TB WD Caviar Black 2 TB
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
XSPC Rads, EKWB blocks, Gentle Typhoons Win 10, Pro 64 bit Dell 27", 1440P Das Keyboard
PowerCase
Silverstone Strider ST-1500 Lian Li PC-A77B
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
Return Home
Back to Forum: Water Cooling
• The importance of the "order" of your loop?
Overclock.net › Forums › Cooling › Water Cooling › The importance of the "order" of your loop?