Originally Posted by NBrock
Yeah but at least with the nano they didn't scale back the core count. A buddy of mine has one and was able to hit just under 1100 with the stock cooler. I can ask him to fold and see what kinda temps it manages. The fury x just don't clock very well unfortunately. I'm only running 1145 atm. Was running a tad higher but the voltage needed didn't really seem worth it. For 1170 I needed +50 mv. For 1145 only need +6 (hit a wu that seemed to give it some trouble at stock voltage so I upped it a tiny bit). So far it seems pretty stable. I know if I mess around a bit and test different drivers I could get more but I was running out of time for testing before the beginning of the month so I just stuck with it for now. Didn't want to have down time my first month back with tc while I got clocks sorted out.
I was kinda anticipating the lousy overclocking with these cards though. I remember hearing several reviewers saying that they couldn't really push the cards as far as they wanted. Personally, I want one of these cards ((or 2
)) just to say that I own the first gen HBM cards. Also good PPD is nice too.
If you wouldn't mind doing some testing with the nano, I would love to see how it compares to the X. Definitely would be good if we could get more data added to the WU Database.
Originally Posted by WonderMutt
I have a brand new EVGA 950 FTW (THIS ONE
I believe, I'm at work and can't double check the model number), still in the box, still in plastic that I'm willing to part with for $115 shipped if anyone is interested...If I don't get any takers I'll post it in the BST section of the forum in a week or so, but I thought I would give some folders a chance first.
Originally Posted by stickg1
Yes, I want this. Pm sent.
Wait a second what
, I was hoping @u3b3rg33k
would have gotten to it first...
Ah well, hope the negotiations go well!