Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD CPUs › FX 57 & 60 -VS- Opt 165 & 170
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

FX 57 & 60 -VS- Opt 165 & 170

post #1 of 13
Thread Starter 
i hear te opteron 165 outperform 57 stock ? is it true and 170 vs fx60 , it outperforms it
    
OSKeyboardMouse
XP Home 32bit stock stock 
  hide details  
Reply
    
OSKeyboardMouse
XP Home 32bit stock stock 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2 of 13
The FX60 is faster than the 170 at stock, but the 170 will overclock to FX60 speeds. So they might perform the same, but the 170 wouldn't be faster, just much cheaper.
Morpheus Mini
(7 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-6700T SN970 GTX 960 Crucial CT102464BF160B 
Hard DriveOSAudio
Samsung 850 Evo M.2 Windows 10 Pro MOTU Audio Express 
  hide details  
Reply
Morpheus Mini
(7 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-6700T SN970 GTX 960 Crucial CT102464BF160B 
Hard DriveOSAudio
Samsung 850 Evo M.2 Windows 10 Pro MOTU Audio Express 
  hide details  
Reply
post #3 of 13
Well first off the 165 is dual core and the 57 is not plus the 57 is 2.8ghz and the 165 is 1.8ghz. Now the 60 is 2.6 and dual core but the 170 is only 2.0 ghz and dual core. So the FX60 beats the 170 and the 165 is no comparison to the FX57.
Silverbullet
(19 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
4690k MSI Gaming 5  Asus GTX670 DC2OG Corsair Vengeance 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Corsair Vengeance LP Kingston SSDnow 120gb m.2 Kingston SSDnow 240gb Enermax ETS-T40-BK 
OSMonitorMonitorKeyboard
Windows 10 Acer GN246HL Acer X233H Logitech G710+ 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
FSP Aurum 650w Lian Li PC-V1000PII Razer Deathadder Chroma Xtrac Pad Ripper 
AudioAudio
Sound Blaster Z Sennheiser HD598 
  hide details  
Reply
Silverbullet
(19 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
4690k MSI Gaming 5  Asus GTX670 DC2OG Corsair Vengeance 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Corsair Vengeance LP Kingston SSDnow 120gb m.2 Kingston SSDnow 240gb Enermax ETS-T40-BK 
OSMonitorMonitorKeyboard
Windows 10 Acer GN246HL Acer X233H Logitech G710+ 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
FSP Aurum 650w Lian Li PC-V1000PII Razer Deathadder Chroma Xtrac Pad Ripper 
AudioAudio
Sound Blaster Z Sennheiser HD598 
  hide details  
Reply
post #4 of 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by cer0c
i hear te opteron 165 outperform 57 stock ? is it true and 170 vs fx60 , it outperforms it
I don't think it does. Where did you hear that from?
Elite
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
IBM PPC Triple core @ 3.2GHz Custom ATi Xenos 10MB 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
120GB DVD ROM XBox 360 Dashboard Dell 24" 2405FPW 
PowerCase
Big Honkin One Black 
  hide details  
Reply
Elite
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
IBM PPC Triple core @ 3.2GHz Custom ATi Xenos 10MB 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
120GB DVD ROM XBox 360 Dashboard Dell 24" 2405FPW 
PowerCase
Big Honkin One Black 
  hide details  
Reply
post #5 of 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by mycomputersucks
Well first off the 165 is dual core and the 57 is not plus the 57 is 2.8ghz and the 165 is 1.8ghz. Now the 60 is 2.6 and dual core but the 170 is only 2.0 ghz and dual core. So the FX60 beats the 170 and the 165 is no comparison to the FX57.
Yeah, But a overclocked 170 can be just as good as a FX60.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Xp 2800+ Some asus AGP 8800GTX. (9600pro) 512mb PC2700 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
80gb 7200rpm Windows Xp Home Compaq 7500 CRT 16' Saitek Eclipse II 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
200w HP Logitech G5 Allsop gamers ed 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Xp 2800+ Some asus AGP 8800GTX. (9600pro) 512mb PC2700 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
80gb 7200rpm Windows Xp Home Compaq 7500 CRT 16' Saitek Eclipse II 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
200w HP Logitech G5 Allsop gamers ed 
  hide details  
Reply
post #6 of 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by OpTioN
Yeah, But a overclocked 170 can be just as good as a FX60.
You're forgetting that you can overclock the FX-60 as well.
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 2500k Asus P8P67 Galaxy GTX580 8GB G Skill Ripjaws 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Intel 80 gb SSD, Raptor 150 Windows 7 Home Premium 24" Samsung LCD Saitek Eclipse 
PowerCaseMouse
PCP&C 750W Antec P180 Logitech MX-510 blue 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 2500k Asus P8P67 Galaxy GTX580 8GB G Skill Ripjaws 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Intel 80 gb SSD, Raptor 150 Windows 7 Home Premium 24" Samsung LCD Saitek Eclipse 
PowerCaseMouse
PCP&C 750W Antec P180 Logitech MX-510 blue 
  hide details  
Reply
post #7 of 13
Yeah, overclock an FX60 to 3GHz+, and an Opty 170 can't touch it. I doubt you could get a 170 to 3Ghz with anything short of a waterchiller or even phase.
post #8 of 13
The point is you can overclock a 170 to FX-60 GHz and get FX-60 results at stock. This is the whole point of overclocking isn't it, to get more out of something that what is intended. If you do a cost effective analysis with overclocking taken into consideration you would be foolish to spend $1000 plus on an FX-60 when you could buy a 165 and match its performance for a third of the cost.

That way you can laugh at all those suckers who do not overclock and shelled out $1100 for an FX-60. Are the Opteron 165 and 170 as good as a FX-57 or FX-60? No. Are they better when you examine end results and price? You are damn skippy.
Main Rig
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E2180 Gigabyte GA-EP35-DS3L MSI 9800GT Mushkin 2x1GB DDR2-800 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD 400GB / Seagate 80GB Asus 18X DVD-Burner Vista Ultimate 32-bit KDS 22" LCD 
PowerCaseMouse
Mushkin 550W Antec P180B Logitech Mx500 
  hide details  
Reply
Main Rig
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E2180 Gigabyte GA-EP35-DS3L MSI 9800GT Mushkin 2x1GB DDR2-800 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD 400GB / Seagate 80GB Asus 18X DVD-Burner Vista Ultimate 32-bit KDS 22" LCD 
PowerCaseMouse
Mushkin 550W Antec P180B Logitech Mx500 
  hide details  
Reply
post #9 of 13
when ALL ARE OC'ed.

FX-60 wins, opty 170 get #2, FX-57 takes 3rd, and the other opty gets last.
(only becuase the 57 isnt dual core)
Magnum
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i5-4460 Some crappy thing EVGA GTX960 6GB DDR3 PC10600 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Seagate 1TB / 128GB SSD Win 7 23" Samsung Logitech G51 
PowerCase
600W CM Centurion 5 
  hide details  
Reply
Magnum
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i5-4460 Some crappy thing EVGA GTX960 6GB DDR3 PC10600 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Seagate 1TB / 128GB SSD Win 7 23" Samsung Logitech G51 
PowerCase
600W CM Centurion 5 
  hide details  
Reply
post #10 of 13
the 170 might get to the same speed but it doesnt work as well as the 60. diffrent steppings and cores ='s diffrent results in performance(or so i though correct me if wrong)
Deep Blue
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Phenom 2 X4 940 BE MSI DKA790GX Platinum Sapphire HD4890 OC Corsair C5D8500 2x1Gig Kit 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD Cavair Black 500 LG DVD+ RW Windows 7 Ultimate Samsung 2494hs 24 Wide 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Razer Tarantula Enermax Liberty 620W DD Torture Rack Razer Lachesis 
Mouse Pad
Razer Pro Solutions 
  hide details  
Reply
Deep Blue
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Phenom 2 X4 940 BE MSI DKA790GX Platinum Sapphire HD4890 OC Corsair C5D8500 2x1Gig Kit 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD Cavair Black 500 LG DVD+ RW Windows 7 Ultimate Samsung 2494hs 24 Wide 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Razer Tarantula Enermax Liberty 620W DD Torture Rack Razer Lachesis 
Mouse Pad
Razer Pro Solutions 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: AMD CPUs
Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD CPUs › FX 57 & 60 -VS- Opt 165 & 170