May 2012, AMD Catalyst 12.4 drivers, MSI Z77a-gd65 + i3570k processor
Multi-Monitor – single vs. multiple video cards.
This has been discussed in other forum posts but it hasn’t really received a lot of attention.
When using a dedicated graphics card in multi-monitor mode; it will draw significantly more power than using 2 video cards with only 1 monitor attached. This is true for AMD & Nvidia solutions. What happens is that when 2+ monitors are being driven by one card; it is running the gpu at a higher frequency and running the memory at FULL speed.
In my case, I have a Asus Radeon HD 6850 / 1gb DDR5 memory.
Radeon => 2 monitors (1920x1200 + 1280x1024)
At idle => GPU 300 mhz / RAM 1100 Mhz (overclocked).
Radeon => 1 monitor (1920x1200)
At idle => GPU 100 mhz/ Ram 150 Mhz
Radeon => monitor 1 (1920x1200) + Ivybridge integrated Graphics => monitor 2 (1280x1024)
At idle => GPU 100mhz/Ram 150 mhz.
Since the discrete graphics draws a lot more power than integrated; you can see a 25+ watt decrease in power usage. This has been documented in other forums as I said but I’ve never heard of it until now!
It has to do with the way the driver’s run to prevent multi-monitor vsync tearing/artifacts and AMD/Nvidia’s solution is just to keep the graphics cards at full speed.
You’ll find that this is less of a problem for low speed cards (ie: radeon 5450 hardly makes a difference since it’s the ram that seems to remain significantly powered a full speed in idle).
I first noted this as a problem as I’m trying to drop case temperatures and noted that the video cooler was hot to the touch at idle!
So… If you have a sandybridge/ivybridge core with IGP. You now have a reason to use both. I don’t bother using Virtu MVP technology as I find that is still buggy at this time. Instead, I have IGP graphics turned on in bios and have 1 monitored plugged into my ATI card and another one to the IGP via my motherboard.
References
http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=173710
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2066336