Overclock.net › Forums › Cooling › Cooling Experiments › Watercooled heatpipe CPU heatsink
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Watercooled heatpipe CPU heatsink - Page 2

post #11 of 52
hmm. sorry to hijack the thread kinda, but what if instead of making a container around the heatsink, you saw off the top of the heatpipes, drain the fluid inside them, weld on a bunch of reducers, and run your liquid cooling through the heatpipes?

Essentially it will be like a radiator+waterblock combined?
post #12 of 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archer S View Post
hmm. sorry to hijack the thread kinda, but what if instead of making a container around the heatsink, you saw off the top of the heatpipes, drain the fluid inside them, weld on a bunch of reducers, and run your liquid cooling through the heatpipes?

Essentially it will be like a radiator+waterblock combined?
No, it'll simply be slightly worse performance than the original heat transfer material inside the heatpipes.
T3h_Fap_Machine
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Q6600 @ 3.2GHz FFFFF Gigabyte EP45-UD3P HD5770 1GB 2x2GB Corsair Dominator 1066MHz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Samsung F3 1TB + WD 3200AAKS LG Super multi something Windows 7 Home Premium x64 BenQ 22" 1080p 40000DCR 5ms 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
crappy gigabyte 430W Antec Truepower Trio CM 690 (modded) Razer Diamondback 3G Flame Red 
Mouse Pad
Razer Goliathus Omega Speed Edition 
  hide details  
Reply
T3h_Fap_Machine
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Q6600 @ 3.2GHz FFFFF Gigabyte EP45-UD3P HD5770 1GB 2x2GB Corsair Dominator 1066MHz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Samsung F3 1TB + WD 3200AAKS LG Super multi something Windows 7 Home Premium x64 BenQ 22" 1080p 40000DCR 5ms 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
crappy gigabyte 430W Antec Truepower Trio CM 690 (modded) Razer Diamondback 3G Flame Red 
Mouse Pad
Razer Goliathus Omega Speed Edition 
  hide details  
Reply
post #13 of 52
Essentially this is a WC setup but with the radiator in direct contact with the heat source, thus the "radiator" can't radiate any heat because it doesn't have an medium to do so.

Cool idea, but in theory a passive system with just a radiator and no fans will cool better.
Test
(10 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 3820 x79-UD3 EVGA GTX 670 Samsung 1.35v low pro 
Hard DriveMonitorKeyboardPower
Crucial M4 Yamakasi Catleap Ducky DK-1087 ST-1000G 
CaseMouse
Lian Li A71F Steelseries - Ikari 
  hide details  
Reply
Test
(10 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 3820 x79-UD3 EVGA GTX 670 Samsung 1.35v low pro 
Hard DriveMonitorKeyboardPower
Crucial M4 Yamakasi Catleap Ducky DK-1087 ST-1000G 
CaseMouse
Lian Li A71F Steelseries - Ikari 
  hide details  
Reply
post #14 of 52
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archer S View Post
hmm. sorry to hijack the thread kinda, but what if instead of making a container around the heatsink, you saw off the top of the heatpipes, drain the fluid inside them, weld on a bunch of reducers, and run your liquid cooling through the heatpipes?

Essentially it will be like a radiator+waterblock combined?
I think this will not be better than using a typical waterblock because the heat transfer surface area between water and the heated area is less than a typical waterblock's (hundreds of pins).

My idea is to discard the push/pull fans (blowing air over the fins to remove heat) and use water to cool the fins.
post #15 of 52
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by fl0w3n View Post
Essentially this is a WC setup but with the radiator in direct contact with the heat source, thus the "radiator" can't radiate any heat because it doesn't have an medium to do so.

Cool idea, but in theory a passive system with just a radiator and no fans will cool better.
I think you misunderstand the setup.
It does not involve any 'radiation' at all. Heat is transferred up the heatpipes and then to the fins which are cooled by flowing water.
post #16 of 52
yes, but what cools the water? Eventually the heat MUST be dissipated to the air. That's what radiators are for - to convert the heat from water into the air.
T3h_Fap_Machine
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Q6600 @ 3.2GHz FFFFF Gigabyte EP45-UD3P HD5770 1GB 2x2GB Corsair Dominator 1066MHz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Samsung F3 1TB + WD 3200AAKS LG Super multi something Windows 7 Home Premium x64 BenQ 22" 1080p 40000DCR 5ms 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
crappy gigabyte 430W Antec Truepower Trio CM 690 (modded) Razer Diamondback 3G Flame Red 
Mouse Pad
Razer Goliathus Omega Speed Edition 
  hide details  
Reply
T3h_Fap_Machine
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Q6600 @ 3.2GHz FFFFF Gigabyte EP45-UD3P HD5770 1GB 2x2GB Corsair Dominator 1066MHz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Samsung F3 1TB + WD 3200AAKS LG Super multi something Windows 7 Home Premium x64 BenQ 22" 1080p 40000DCR 5ms 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
crappy gigabyte 430W Antec Truepower Trio CM 690 (modded) Razer Diamondback 3G Flame Red 
Mouse Pad
Razer Goliathus Omega Speed Edition 
  hide details  
Reply
post #17 of 52
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by T3h_Ch33z_Muncha View Post
yes, but what cools the water? Eventually the heat MUST be dissipated to the air. That's what radiators are for - to convert the heat from water into the air.
Oh! I see you are worrying that end of the loop.
Water is to be cooled by a radiator+fans....just a normal regular watercooling system.

Basically, the idea is to replace a traditional waterblock (with numerous internal pins or micro channels to provide surface area for heat transfer) by the following pic.
Or, the idea is to replace the push/pull fans of a heatsink with water cooling.
post #18 of 52
there is a huge conversation on this over on xs, the block in question was sent to skinnee and it was proved in effective. The block in question was much better designed for the purpose too. It is really a good idea and every tinkerer has thought of it one time or another but it is a big waste of time. Keep up the out of the box thinking however this time it would be in your best interest to move on with a different project. It will not out perform the cheapest waterblock you can find. So your better off getting a waterblock.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
1100T ga-990fx-ud3 gtx 4602win corsair dominator 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
OLD none windows 7 x64 Ultimate 3d projector with 98in screen MOFO 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
DUMB ocz 1000w pretty ugly logitech wireless 
Mouse PadOtherOther
carpet gtx285 classified for physix Nvidia 3d vison  
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
1100T ga-990fx-ud3 gtx 4602win corsair dominator 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
OLD none windows 7 x64 Ultimate 3d projector with 98in screen MOFO 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
DUMB ocz 1000w pretty ugly logitech wireless 
Mouse PadOtherOther
carpet gtx285 classified for physix Nvidia 3d vison  
  hide details  
Reply
post #19 of 52
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shrimpykins View Post
If I could make the bottom of my Heatkiller 2.0 1 atom thick, I would, I can't though.
This is one concern of mine and you have rightly point it out.
post #20 of 52
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by reggiesanchez View Post
there is a huge conversation on this over on xs, the block in question was sent to skinnee and it was proved in effective. The block in question was much better designed for the purpose too. It is really a good idea and every tinkerer has thought of it one time or another but it is a big waste of time. Keep up the out of the box thinking however this time it would be in your best interest to move on with a different project. It will not out perform the cheapest waterblock you can find. So your better off getting a waterblock.
Could you provide the XS link please?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Cooling Experiments
Overclock.net › Forums › Cooling › Cooling Experiments › Watercooled heatpipe CPU heatsink