Overclock.net › Forums › Intel › Intel CPUs › Celeron M beats FX-60
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Celeron M beats FX-60 - Page 3

post #21 of 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by frostbite
This isn't really fair the yonah is 65nm and the fx60 is 90nm they completely different technologies
True, but when I buy new stuff, I care more about the performance in the end than in the underlying technology (although very interesting also). I deliberately got a Northwood over a Prescott, although the Prescott is the 'newer' technology.

Also, I am not believing for one moment that AMD is just staring at Intel without any reaction. They might not be able to immediately match Conroe's price/performance (to me, Conroe's anticipated price is one of its strongest points), but they won't let it pass without a fight.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E8400 @ 3.8 GHz DFI LANPARTY DK X38-T2R eVGA 8400GS 2GB Mushkin DDR2 800 (single stick) 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
250GB WD SATA None Windows XP Pro 32-bit HP Pavilion f1703 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
N/A Corsair HX520 Coolermaster Cavalier N/A 
Mouse Pad
N/A 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E8400 @ 3.8 GHz DFI LANPARTY DK X38-T2R eVGA 8400GS 2GB Mushkin DDR2 800 (single stick) 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
250GB WD SATA None Windows XP Pro 32-bit HP Pavilion f1703 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
N/A Corsair HX520 Coolermaster Cavalier N/A 
Mouse Pad
N/A 
  hide details  
Reply
post #22 of 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chozart
True, but when I buy new stuff, I care more about the performance in the end than in the underlying technology (although very interesting also). I deliberately got a Northwood over a Prescott, although the Prescott is the 'newer' technology.
I went from a 3.0E Prescott BACK to a 2.4 Northwood.

Purely for the fact that they have 21 pipelines and run considerably cooler and hence clock for clock/temps they perform better
Desktop
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Opteron 165 CCBBE 0615DPMW 2.6GHz (9x290) DFI NF4 SLI-D (HR-05-SLI Passive Chipset Cooler) BFG 8800GTS OC 640MB 620/1860 Mushkin Redline 4x1GB DDR475 (3-3-2-7 2T) 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
3x 74GB WD Raptor (RAID 0) + 2.2TB of SATA HDDs NEC DVD/RW SATA XP Home Edition SP3 IIyama H481S 19' TFT 1280x1024 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Eluminix (Backlight) OCZ Modstream520w 28A,12v Single Rail Antec P182 Razer, Copperhead Blue 
Mouse Pad
Razer Exactamat 
  hide details  
Reply
Desktop
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Opteron 165 CCBBE 0615DPMW 2.6GHz (9x290) DFI NF4 SLI-D (HR-05-SLI Passive Chipset Cooler) BFG 8800GTS OC 640MB 620/1860 Mushkin Redline 4x1GB DDR475 (3-3-2-7 2T) 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
3x 74GB WD Raptor (RAID 0) + 2.2TB of SATA HDDs NEC DVD/RW SATA XP Home Edition SP3 IIyama H481S 19' TFT 1280x1024 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Eluminix (Backlight) OCZ Modstream520w 28A,12v Single Rail Antec P182 Razer, Copperhead Blue 
Mouse Pad
Razer Exactamat 
  hide details  
Reply
post #23 of 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by MjrTom
I went from a 3.0E Prescott BACK to a 2.4 Northwood.

Purely for the fact that they have 21 pipelines and run considerably cooler and hence clock for clock/temps they perform better
Do you realise what a 14 pipeline dual core 3 GHz could do? I really think in certain apps even a celeron based on "core" can outrun a FX60. If that's the case guess who's gonna swich to Intel this summer? That's until K8L shows up, of course
Centurion
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II 940 @3.3GHz 1.25V Gigabyte 790X-DS4 XFX 5850 8GB OCZ DDR2-800 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Corsair Force 3 TRUE Win 7 Pro x64 ACER 23" TN  
PowerCase
400W Silverstone Strider Antec P182 
  hide details  
Reply
Centurion
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II 940 @3.3GHz 1.25V Gigabyte 790X-DS4 XFX 5850 8GB OCZ DDR2-800 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Corsair Force 3 TRUE Win 7 Pro x64 ACER 23" TN  
PowerCase
400W Silverstone Strider Antec P182 
  hide details  
Reply
post #24 of 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by dragosmp
Do you realise what a 14 pipeline dual core 3 GHz could do? I really think in certain apps even a celeron based on "core" can outrun a FX60. If that's the case guess who's gonna swich to Intel this summer? That's until K8L shows up, of course
I was already to take the leap into AMD S939 but have now put it on hold until i know what the newer technologies can bring.

I have no brand loyalty what so ever... whatever performs better gets my vote
Desktop
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Opteron 165 CCBBE 0615DPMW 2.6GHz (9x290) DFI NF4 SLI-D (HR-05-SLI Passive Chipset Cooler) BFG 8800GTS OC 640MB 620/1860 Mushkin Redline 4x1GB DDR475 (3-3-2-7 2T) 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
3x 74GB WD Raptor (RAID 0) + 2.2TB of SATA HDDs NEC DVD/RW SATA XP Home Edition SP3 IIyama H481S 19' TFT 1280x1024 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Eluminix (Backlight) OCZ Modstream520w 28A,12v Single Rail Antec P182 Razer, Copperhead Blue 
Mouse Pad
Razer Exactamat 
  hide details  
Reply
Desktop
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Opteron 165 CCBBE 0615DPMW 2.6GHz (9x290) DFI NF4 SLI-D (HR-05-SLI Passive Chipset Cooler) BFG 8800GTS OC 640MB 620/1860 Mushkin Redline 4x1GB DDR475 (3-3-2-7 2T) 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
3x 74GB WD Raptor (RAID 0) + 2.2TB of SATA HDDs NEC DVD/RW SATA XP Home Edition SP3 IIyama H481S 19' TFT 1280x1024 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Eluminix (Backlight) OCZ Modstream520w 28A,12v Single Rail Antec P182 Razer, Copperhead Blue 
Mouse Pad
Razer Exactamat 
  hide details  
Reply
post #25 of 32
That's not a bad OC you getting out of that Northy MjrTom
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E8400 @ 3.8 GHz DFI LANPARTY DK X38-T2R eVGA 8400GS 2GB Mushkin DDR2 800 (single stick) 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
250GB WD SATA None Windows XP Pro 32-bit HP Pavilion f1703 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
N/A Corsair HX520 Coolermaster Cavalier N/A 
Mouse Pad
N/A 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E8400 @ 3.8 GHz DFI LANPARTY DK X38-T2R eVGA 8400GS 2GB Mushkin DDR2 800 (single stick) 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
250GB WD SATA None Windows XP Pro 32-bit HP Pavilion f1703 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
N/A Corsair HX520 Coolermaster Cavalier N/A 
Mouse Pad
N/A 
  hide details  
Reply
post #26 of 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by mootin
its obvious there butt sucking intel in this, im sick of the constant storys of how intel can out beat amd fx60's with just a little bit of overclocking, yes conroe is going to be amazing but thats a different story.But beating an fx60 with a mobile chip, please
end rant .......now
Believe it. Yonah is an amazing chip, and these little mobile Celerons overclock like mad. The article I read about them featured the guy overclocking one from 1.7Ghz to 3.1Ghz on air, with a Super Pi time of less than 21 seconds. Intel's mobile chips are THE most efficient chips (clockspeed vs performance) out there.
post #27 of 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by MjrTom
whatever performs better gets my vote
True, true, that's the most important. I'd be very happy to see a 150€ CPU performing like a 1000€ mamoth. I suppose they are decent OCers also, like all the cellys.
Centurion
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II 940 @3.3GHz 1.25V Gigabyte 790X-DS4 XFX 5850 8GB OCZ DDR2-800 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Corsair Force 3 TRUE Win 7 Pro x64 ACER 23" TN  
PowerCase
400W Silverstone Strider Antec P182 
  hide details  
Reply
Centurion
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II 940 @3.3GHz 1.25V Gigabyte 790X-DS4 XFX 5850 8GB OCZ DDR2-800 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Corsair Force 3 TRUE Win 7 Pro x64 ACER 23" TN  
PowerCase
400W Silverstone Strider Antec P182 
  hide details  
Reply
post #28 of 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chozart
That's not a bad OC you getting out of that Northy MjrTom
Thank mate

I am very impressed myself. It took a LOT of forum reading (like this one ) before i picked my hardware, such as a S478 board that can hit 300FSB stable. I need to do a VDroop mod on it prior to the custom water cooling which i am installing in the next few weeks.

Il let you all know how high i can push it then
Desktop
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Opteron 165 CCBBE 0615DPMW 2.6GHz (9x290) DFI NF4 SLI-D (HR-05-SLI Passive Chipset Cooler) BFG 8800GTS OC 640MB 620/1860 Mushkin Redline 4x1GB DDR475 (3-3-2-7 2T) 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
3x 74GB WD Raptor (RAID 0) + 2.2TB of SATA HDDs NEC DVD/RW SATA XP Home Edition SP3 IIyama H481S 19' TFT 1280x1024 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Eluminix (Backlight) OCZ Modstream520w 28A,12v Single Rail Antec P182 Razer, Copperhead Blue 
Mouse Pad
Razer Exactamat 
  hide details  
Reply
Desktop
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Opteron 165 CCBBE 0615DPMW 2.6GHz (9x290) DFI NF4 SLI-D (HR-05-SLI Passive Chipset Cooler) BFG 8800GTS OC 640MB 620/1860 Mushkin Redline 4x1GB DDR475 (3-3-2-7 2T) 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
3x 74GB WD Raptor (RAID 0) + 2.2TB of SATA HDDs NEC DVD/RW SATA XP Home Edition SP3 IIyama H481S 19' TFT 1280x1024 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Eluminix (Backlight) OCZ Modstream520w 28A,12v Single Rail Antec P182 Razer, Copperhead Blue 
Mouse Pad
Razer Exactamat 
  hide details  
Reply
post #29 of 32
I have stayed completely out of the "Processor Wars" fray because at this time it is still only speculation as to a complete Conroe testing. Only when such tests are final on a platform that is purchased through retail outlets will I begin to look at the AMD vs Intel chip supremacy.

Yes, there is some data out there but it is just data until it can be completely compiled into information and there is not enough data for a complete informational compilation.

Anything else with regards to agreement or disagreement in the "Processor Wars" is early and no better than opinion. Opinion can (when well informed) be correct, however it is still just opinion until the data is compiled into information to prove correctness.

Thus anyone here stating one side versus other views is as a greyhound out of the docks too quickly. Otherwise known as a "False Start".

This is my view at any rate.

R
Roped In
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7 2600k P8P67 Pro Rev (3.1) @ B3 XFX Radeon HD 6950 XXX 16GB G.SKILL Ripjaws 9-11-9-28 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2 X Callisto Deluxe 25nm 60GB Plextor PX-B910SA 4x Blu-ray DVD-RW Win7 64 2 x Samsung 275T+ 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G15 Corsair HX10000 Antec 1200 Logitech G7 
Mouse Pad
Splatter Game Pad 
  hide details  
Reply
Roped In
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7 2600k P8P67 Pro Rev (3.1) @ B3 XFX Radeon HD 6950 XXX 16GB G.SKILL Ripjaws 9-11-9-28 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2 X Callisto Deluxe 25nm 60GB Plextor PX-B910SA 4x Blu-ray DVD-RW Win7 64 2 x Samsung 275T+ 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G15 Corsair HX10000 Antec 1200 Logitech G7 
Mouse Pad
Splatter Game Pad 
  hide details  
Reply
post #30 of 32
Thread Starter 
My theory is that all Intel mobile chips are AMD's that got switched in transit. Yes, that is a joke. However, Pentium M chips act like A64's and XP's.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Intel CPUs
Overclock.net › Forums › Intel › Intel CPUs › Celeron M beats FX-60