We need to bring back important info such as the accel, prediction, LOD and max speed/perfect control.
About the standardization of the list so that the new list would have objective info. Skylit, If you want to have complete QA control over the benchmarks score then you decide if you should use enotus or outterspace and with mousepad to use.
If you want people to be able to contribute to the list then I suggest using a tool that is universally usable and generally foolproof. For that I suppose enotus fits the bill. While outterspace have more accuraccy and info, it is harder to use and I can see various potential where a reviewer could misread results due to incorrect methodologies.
As for a standard mousepad. I suggest using universally available popular mousepad that isn't exotically priced or hard to source. And of course the mousepad shouldn't have known issues with tracking. Also I suggest using both a soft pad and a hardpad. Maybe options like QCK heavy and the 9HD or Destructor. Zowie, Puretrack is harder to find in many parts of the world. whereas established brands like steelseries and razer are easier to find.
The purpose is to standardize the results and to allow as many people to contribute without bias.
What do you guys think?