Overclock.net › Forums › Benchmarks › Benchmarking Software and Discussion › Post your 3DMARK11 Scores!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Post your 3DMARK11 Scores! - Page 533

post #5321 of 6999
I just added an EVGA GTX-680 to my 2600K system. There is 16GB of DDR3-1600 Ram in it and it has a 256GB SSD too.
It's pretty snappy considering that the 680 replaced a GTX-570.

post #5322 of 6999
I really hope someone is able to help me, because I'm going to ask again. I can't find out any rhyme or reason to my low physics score. I even upgraded to 16 gigs of ram in a desperate attempt to get slightly better performance.

My system is in my description, but what I'm working with is a 2500k at 4.7 ghz clock speeds, with 16 gigs of corsair vengeance 1600 ddr3 ram.

My graphics score is right around where it should be, but my physics score is WAY to low for a 4.7 ghz overclock.

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/6611446

Now the last time I asked people were wondering for reference what my score was with stock settings on my CPU, here is my physics score/combined

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/6611472

I don't know if this is lower than normal for a 2500k, but I really feel my physics score should be much closer to 8500 with a 4.7ghz overclock. Yes I'm on windows 8, but even before on windows 7 it was maybe only 300 points better it wasn't 1000 points difference.

Please help people.

Also for reference, here is a copy of my firestrike score.

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/477202

Thank you in advance.
post #5323 of 6999
PhysX is a product of NVIDIA and works much better with NVIDIA cards.
post #5324 of 6999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Niexist View Post

I really hope someone is able to help me, because I'm going to ask again. I can't find out any rhyme or reason to my low physics score. I even upgraded to 16 gigs of ram in a desperate attempt to get slightly better performance.

My system is in my description, but what I'm working with is a 2500k at 4.7 ghz clock speeds, with 16 gigs of corsair vengeance 1600 ddr3 ram.

My graphics score is right around where it should be, but my physics score is WAY to low for a 4.7 ghz overclock.

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/6611446

Now the last time I asked people were wondering for reference what my score was with stock settings on my CPU, here is my physics score/combined

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/6611472

I don't know if this is lower than normal for a 2500k, but I really feel my physics score should be much closer to 8500 with a 4.7ghz overclock. Yes I'm on windows 8, but even before on windows 7 it was maybe only 300 points better it wasn't 1000 points difference.

Please help people.

Also for reference, here is a copy of my firestrike score.

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/477202

Thank you in advance.

Windows 8 can make it a bit lower as noted, the 3dmark 11 version can also affect the physics score, 1.01 tends to score physics higher than later versions.
The other player besides cpu frequency is memory, from 1600Mhz with loose timings to 2133mhz with tight timings can make a fair difference in the physics score.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RealNeil View Post

PhysX is a product of NVIDIA and works much better with NVIDIA cards.

There is no physx in 3dmark 11 though, it was just in 3dmark vantage & in a few games.

3dmark 11 uses physics, AMD or Nvidia doesn't matter, it runs on the cpu now the way it is supposed to.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 990x/3930k/3770k/4770k GB x58a-OC/Asus RIVE/x79 gd65/z77 mpower/z77 MV... gtx480s/gtx580s/7970s/680s/Titan Hyper/PSC/BBSE/Hynix/Samsung 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
HDDs/SSDs DVD Air/water/phase/copper pot Windowz 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
samsung 2320 Razer Lycosa ax1200 carboard box 
Mouse
Trackball 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 990x/3930k/3770k/4770k GB x58a-OC/Asus RIVE/x79 gd65/z77 mpower/z77 MV... gtx480s/gtx580s/7970s/680s/Titan Hyper/PSC/BBSE/Hynix/Samsung 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
HDDs/SSDs DVD Air/water/phase/copper pot Windowz 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
samsung 2320 Razer Lycosa ax1200 carboard box 
Mouse
Trackball 
  hide details  
Reply
post #5325 of 6999
Quote:
Originally Posted by FtW 420 View Post

Windows 8 can make it a bit lower as noted, the 3dmark 11 version can also affect the physics score, 1.01 tends to score physics higher than later versions.
The other player besides cpu frequency is memory, from 1600Mhz with loose timings to 2133mhz with tight timings can make a fair difference in the physics score.
There is no physx in 3dmark 11 though, it was just in 3dmark vantage & in a few games.

3dmark 11 uses physics, AMD or Nvidia doesn't matter, it runs on the cpu now the way it is supposed to.

I'm just going to spell it out for you once more, people with the EXACT same setup with the SAME memory timings as me, with LOWER overclocks are scoring 1000 points higher than me WHILE RUNNING WINDOWS 8. There is some kind of other problem here besides what you're describing.
post #5326 of 6999
Quote:
Originally Posted by RealNeil View Post

I just added an EVGA GTX-680 to my 2600K system. There is 16GB of DDR3-1600 Ram in it and it has a 256GB SSD too.
It's pretty snappy considering that the 680 replaced a GTX-570.


My 3570K @ 4.5 ghz and my 7950 at 1160/1510 destroys that. Is everything you have running at stock??
Firestrike
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/473613

Cloud Gate
http://www.3dmark.com/cg/449412

Ice Storm
http://www.3dmark.com/is/501688

post #5327 of 6999
Quote:
Originally Posted by CravinR1 View Post

My 3570K @ 4.5 ghz and my 7950 at 1160/1510 destroys that. Is everything you have running at stock??
Firestrike
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/473613

Cloud Gate
http://www.3dmark.com/cg/449412

Ice Storm
http://www.3dmark.com/is/501688


See if I compare my physics score with this one at 4.5 ghz I should have a slightly higher phyciscs score, is your memory overclocks cravinR1? We all know 2500k and 3570k should perform very similar.

What I mean is, if you compare my 3dmark score with his on a 3570k they are very similar, but I bet if he runs 3dmark11 he still scores 8500ish with his 3570k, and I score 7400ish
Edited by Niexist - 5/22/13 at 7:02pm
post #5328 of 6999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Niexist View Post

I'm just going to spell it out for you once more, people with the EXACT same setup with the SAME memory timings as me, with LOWER overclocks are scoring 1000 points higher than me WHILE RUNNING WINDOWS 8. There is some kind of other problem here besides what you're describing.

I would double check that you are running the same version of the benchmark as the ones that you are comparing to.
I lost quite a bunch of points on my physics score on 3d mark 11 going from an early "free" version , to the latest upgrade version .
Ryzen Shine!
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 1800X @ 4125mhz 1.432 Volts MSI X370 Titanium   Fury  G.SKILL TridentZ Series 32GB (4 x 8GB) 288-Pin... 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Samsung 850 pro Hp 1260 I liquid unobtanium Koolance 480mm radiator, 39... Win 7 HP/Winspy 10 64bit 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
24" hp @ 1900x1200 Logitech G19 PC power and cooling 910 watt silencer Thermaltake P5 
MouseMouse Pad
Logitech MX 518 fUnc industries 
  hide details  
Reply
Ryzen Shine!
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 1800X @ 4125mhz 1.432 Volts MSI X370 Titanium   Fury  G.SKILL TridentZ Series 32GB (4 x 8GB) 288-Pin... 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Samsung 850 pro Hp 1260 I liquid unobtanium Koolance 480mm radiator, 39... Win 7 HP/Winspy 10 64bit 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
24" hp @ 1900x1200 Logitech G19 PC power and cooling 910 watt silencer Thermaltake P5 
MouseMouse Pad
Logitech MX 518 fUnc industries 
  hide details  
Reply
post #5329 of 6999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Niexist View Post

I really hope someone is able to help me, because I'm going to ask again. I can't find out any rhyme or reason to my low physics score. I even upgraded to 16 gigs of ram in a desperate attempt to get slightly better performance.

My system is in my description, but what I'm working with is a 2500k at 4.7 ghz clock speeds, with 16 gigs of corsair vengeance 1600 ddr3 ram.

My graphics score is right around where it should be, but my physics score is WAY to low for a 4.7 ghz overclock.

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/6611446

Now the last time I asked people were wondering for reference what my score was with stock settings on my CPU, here is my physics score/combined

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/6611472

I don't know if this is lower than normal for a 2500k, but I really feel my physics score should be much closer to 8500 with a 4.7ghz overclock. Yes I'm on windows 8, but even before on windows 7 it was maybe only 300 points better it wasn't 1000 points difference.

Please help people.

Also for reference, here is a copy of my firestrike score.

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/477202

Thank you in advance.
see below
Quote:
Originally Posted by RealNeil View Post

PhysX is a product of NVIDIA and works much better with NVIDIA cards.
physx can ONLY run on nvidia.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Niexist View Post

I'm just going to spell it out for you once more, people with the EXACT same setup with the SAME memory timings as me, with LOWER overclocks are scoring 1000 points higher than me WHILE RUNNING WINDOWS 8. There is some kind of other problem here besides what you're describing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cssorkinman View Post

I would double check that you are running the same version of the benchmark as the ones that you are comparing to.
I lost quite a bunch of points on my physics score on 3d mark 11 going from an early "free" version , to the latest upgrade version .

bios and everything else can effect it i know ppl in win 8 that can hit 1500 points more then me, with a saberkitty rev 1 ( still same cpu ) only thing i saw difference was bios at that point...
USS CLM8-1701
(39 items)
 
Her Venom
(21 items)
 
Lil Tough Guy
(15 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
AMD FX-8350 Gigabyte 990FXA-UD7 R7970-2PMD3GD5/OC  R7970-2PMD3GD5/OC  
GraphicsGraphicsRAMHard Drive
R7970-2PMD3GD5/OC  R7970-2PMD3GD5/OC  F3-2400C10D-16GTX  OCZ Agility 3 120GB  
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
OCZ Agility 3 120GB  Seagate Barracuda 1TB  Segate Barracuda 3TB Rosewill RCR-IM5001 USB2.0 75 in 1 internal Car... 
Optical DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
Pioneer BDR-208DBK Blu-ray Writer Swiftech H20-220 EDGE HD Liquid Cooling Kit Swiftech Komodo 7970 Swiftech MCP-35X2 
CoolingCoolingCoolingCooling
Swiftech MCP35X2 Heat Sink Swiftech MCP35X Reservoir Swiftech Komodo 7970 Swiftech Komodo 7970 
CoolingCoolingCoolingCooling
Alphacool 240mm XT45 Alphacool 120mm XT45 Alphacool 120mm UT60 FrozenQ PC Mods UV Meteor Light Limited Edition... 
CoolingCoolingOSOS
Koolance Radiator Mounting Bracket with Quick-R... Swiftech Komodo 7970 Windows 7 Windows 8  
MonitorMonitorMonitorMonitor
ASUS VG248QE Black 24" 144Hz 1ms  ASUS VG248QE Black 24" 144Hz 1ms  ASUS VG248QE Black 24" 144Hz 1ms  XFX FXTRISTAND Triple Display Monitor Stand  
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G510 XFX pro 1250w black edition Caselabs MAGNUM M8 Case Razer Naga 
AudioAudioOther
Sony 2.1 Razer Megalodon XFX pro 1250w black edition 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
8350 batch 1229 pgn  Asus Crosshair V Formula-Z gigabyte 7770 OC gigabyte 7770 OC 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
F3-2400C10D-16GTX OCZ agaility 3 120  OCZ Agility 3 120gb  Seagate 7200rpm 1tb 
Optical DriveOptical DriveCoolingCooling
Pioneer BDR-208DBK Rosewill RCR-IM5001 USB2.0 75 in 1 internal Car... Swiftech MCP-35X White Top Swiftech Quiet Power 240  
CoolingOSOSMonitor
Swiftech Apogee HD Windows 7 Windows 8 LG E2242 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
LG E2242 RAZER Black Lycosa Mirror Special Edition Seasonic x660 Cooler Master Storm Stryker 
Mouse
Razer Lachesis 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
FX 6100 Sabertooth 990fx R2.0 XFX 7770 Core Edition Samsung 1600 2x4 
RAMHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Samsung 1600 2x4 Unknown as of now  Piorneer BDR-208DBK Swiftech H220  
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 8  Samsung 60" 120hz 3d LED TV Unknown Seasonic x750 
CaseMouseAudio
Cooler Master Storm Stryker Unknown Pioneer 5.1 
  hide details  
Reply
USS CLM8-1701
(39 items)
 
Her Venom
(21 items)
 
Lil Tough Guy
(15 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
AMD FX-8350 Gigabyte 990FXA-UD7 R7970-2PMD3GD5/OC  R7970-2PMD3GD5/OC  
GraphicsGraphicsRAMHard Drive
R7970-2PMD3GD5/OC  R7970-2PMD3GD5/OC  F3-2400C10D-16GTX  OCZ Agility 3 120GB  
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
OCZ Agility 3 120GB  Seagate Barracuda 1TB  Segate Barracuda 3TB Rosewill RCR-IM5001 USB2.0 75 in 1 internal Car... 
Optical DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
Pioneer BDR-208DBK Blu-ray Writer Swiftech H20-220 EDGE HD Liquid Cooling Kit Swiftech Komodo 7970 Swiftech MCP-35X2 
CoolingCoolingCoolingCooling
Swiftech MCP35X2 Heat Sink Swiftech MCP35X Reservoir Swiftech Komodo 7970 Swiftech Komodo 7970 
CoolingCoolingCoolingCooling
Alphacool 240mm XT45 Alphacool 120mm XT45 Alphacool 120mm UT60 FrozenQ PC Mods UV Meteor Light Limited Edition... 
CoolingCoolingOSOS
Koolance Radiator Mounting Bracket with Quick-R... Swiftech Komodo 7970 Windows 7 Windows 8  
MonitorMonitorMonitorMonitor
ASUS VG248QE Black 24" 144Hz 1ms  ASUS VG248QE Black 24" 144Hz 1ms  ASUS VG248QE Black 24" 144Hz 1ms  XFX FXTRISTAND Triple Display Monitor Stand  
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G510 XFX pro 1250w black edition Caselabs MAGNUM M8 Case Razer Naga 
AudioAudioOther
Sony 2.1 Razer Megalodon XFX pro 1250w black edition 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
8350 batch 1229 pgn  Asus Crosshair V Formula-Z gigabyte 7770 OC gigabyte 7770 OC 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
F3-2400C10D-16GTX OCZ agaility 3 120  OCZ Agility 3 120gb  Seagate 7200rpm 1tb 
Optical DriveOptical DriveCoolingCooling
Pioneer BDR-208DBK Rosewill RCR-IM5001 USB2.0 75 in 1 internal Car... Swiftech MCP-35X White Top Swiftech Quiet Power 240  
CoolingOSOSMonitor
Swiftech Apogee HD Windows 7 Windows 8 LG E2242 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
LG E2242 RAZER Black Lycosa Mirror Special Edition Seasonic x660 Cooler Master Storm Stryker 
Mouse
Razer Lachesis 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
FX 6100 Sabertooth 990fx R2.0 XFX 7770 Core Edition Samsung 1600 2x4 
RAMHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Samsung 1600 2x4 Unknown as of now  Piorneer BDR-208DBK Swiftech H220  
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 8  Samsung 60" 120hz 3d LED TV Unknown Seasonic x750 
CaseMouseAudio
Cooler Master Storm Stryker Unknown Pioneer 5.1 
  hide details  
Reply
post #5330 of 6999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Niexist View Post

See if I compare my physics score with this one at 4.5 ghz I should have a slightly higher phyciscs score, is your memory overclocks cravinR1? We all know 2500k and 3570k should perform very similar.

What I mean is, if you compare my 3dmark score with his on a 3570k they are very similar, but I bet if he runs 3dmark11 he still scores 8500ish with his 3570k, and I score 7400ish

Seems I may have down clcoked my memory from 1866 to 1600, but i'm not sure frown.gif
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
Overclock.net › Forums › Benchmarks › Benchmarking Software and Discussion › Post your 3DMARK11 Scores!