Quote:
Originally Posted by dougri
it would take low latency and tight timing for 1600 to outbench 2000. and higher speed memory can usually reach faster timings running lower speeds. lower latency (ns, not cycles) as well as tighter timings should make for the most responsive memory. if it is 7-7-7-19 1600MHz vs 9-11-10-28 2000MHz, give me the 1600 memory... even at the same price. But if it is 8-9-8-27 1600MHz vs 9-9-9-27 2000MHz, I'll take the 2000MHz kit.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by reflex99
no, if you 1600MHz is faster than the 2kMHz, you would have more bragging rights
|
No, i thought the guy said whats the point of 2000mhz if you can get 1600mhz without any noticble difference. And i was stating, although there is no performance ingame, you will get a better benchmark result, thus bragging rights.
... or maybe just me who knows
