Overclock.net › Forums › Video Games › PC Gaming › on engines...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

on engines... - Page 2

post #11 of 12
The Source engine has always looked great in my eyes, TF2 for a prime example. Source engine I wish would spread more. I did enjoy the FC2 engine, it gave nice FPS with stable and provided decent GFX comparable to Crysis IMHO.

The frostbite engine I know will stay with DICE and BF games, so i'm not even gonna say I want to see that spread. That's EAs baby right now. I also do enjoy the RAGE engine.

The only problem with this ice, which I'm sure you might know. All this engines are so tied to one company now-a-days its hard to see them spread. RAGE is owned by Rockstar, its their baby, EA has frostbite, Source and Unreal are open to any dev. We just need a new powerful engine like Frostbite or DUNA or RAGE to be more open, then we can see much better games!
Stinger Be3
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
2500k @ 4.6 ASUS Maximus IV Gene-Z/GEN3 Z68 EVGA GTX 570HD  GSkill Ripsaw 8gb DDR3 1600 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
WD 500GB Blue 6gb SATA - Crucial M4 64GB SSD DVD RW+R H212 Evo Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
SAMSUNG 2343BWX 2048x1152 Razer BF3 Keyboard CORSAIR 1000HX CoolerMaster HAF932 
MouseMouse PadAudio
Razer Deathadder Army Mousepad audio technica ATH-700x 
  hide details  
Reply
Stinger Be3
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
2500k @ 4.6 ASUS Maximus IV Gene-Z/GEN3 Z68 EVGA GTX 570HD  GSkill Ripsaw 8gb DDR3 1600 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
WD 500GB Blue 6gb SATA - Crucial M4 64GB SSD DVD RW+R H212 Evo Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
SAMSUNG 2343BWX 2048x1152 Razer BF3 Keyboard CORSAIR 1000HX CoolerMaster HAF932 
MouseMouse PadAudio
Razer Deathadder Army Mousepad audio technica ATH-700x 
  hide details  
Reply
post #12 of 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlawleZ View Post
I honestly wasn't impressed with FC2 at all. Its interesting that several of you are raving about it, but honestly I thought they were quite poor even compared to the 3 year old Crysis. I was more impressed BFBC2 or MoH than I was FC2. And FC2 also highly favored the Nvidia cards. The graphics, IMO, didn't represent the difficulty it presented on the hardware to run it.
This. The game looked kinda bad, imo. Crysis/Warhead look significantly better.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: PC Gaming
Overclock.net › Forums › Video Games › PC Gaming › on engines...