Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › [itocp] Benchmark for i7 2600 @ stock vs i7 875K @ 3.4GHz
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[itocp] Benchmark for i7 2600 @ stock vs i7 875K @ 3.4GHz

post #1 of 72
Thread Starter 
http://www.itocp.com/bbs/thread-74171-1-1.html

Translation to english
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=zh-CN&u=http://www.itocp.com/bbs/thread-74171-1-1.html&ei=tMsRTb7RII-p8QO5kL2CBw&sa=X&oi=translate&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBoQ7gEwAA&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dhttp://www.itocp.com/bbs/thread-74171-1-1.html%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26hs%3D1Z1%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26prmd%3Divns

There is no gaming benchmarks in this review.

And here some sample benchmark from this review

r11.5.jpg

264.jpg

rar.jpg

science.jpg
Edited by ThePath - 12/22/10 at 4:22am
post #2 of 72
The scale on the first cinebench benchmark is misleading.

To get an increase of almost 1 using the same clock speeds is a significant leap forwards. But because they've used the same scale as the openGL benchmark it doesn't look that impressive.
post #3 of 72
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boyboyd;11737069 
The scale on the first cinebench benchmark is misleading.

To get an increase of almost 1 using the same clock speeds is a significant leap forwards. But because they've used the same scale as the openGL benchmark it doesn't look that impressive.

Who cares about the scale ?

I am looking at the numbers

i7 2600 is 17.6% faster in the cinebench CPU benchmark, and 28.3% faster in the opengl benchmark. These results look impressive to me
post #4 of 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePath;11737117 
Who cares about the scale ?

I am looking at the numbers

i7 2600 is 17.6% faster in the cinebench CPU benchmark, and 28.3% faster in the opengl benchmark. These results look impressive to me

Some people don't work like that.

I aggree, i've seen some really impressive increases even at the same clock speed. It looks way better than i expected.
post #5 of 72
Lets see how sb handles multi gpus...
Nice increase right there
The bottleneck
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E5400 @ 3.5 stock volts Msi g31 (no voltage control) Gtx 460 Hawk (Talons attack) 2g Ddr2 @ 651 
Hard DriveOS
250 WD Win 7 64-bit Ultimate 
  hide details  
Reply
The bottleneck
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E5400 @ 3.5 stock volts Msi g31 (no voltage control) Gtx 460 Hawk (Talons attack) 2g Ddr2 @ 651 
Hard DriveOS
250 WD Win 7 64-bit Ultimate 
  hide details  
Reply
post #6 of 72
hmm, this thing might be quick after all. such a shame it doesn't run triple channel memory frown.gif
post #7 of 72
Very nice numbers.
Gaming rig
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-4790K Asus Z97 Pro Wifi EVGA GTX970sc Crucial ballistic 16GB DDR3 1866 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Samsung 850 EVO 256GB SSD WD 1TB HDD Samsung DVDRW Corsair H60 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
W 10 Pro Samsung 23" Logitech g105 Corsair 750w 
Case
Corsair Carbide Spec-02 
  hide details  
Reply
Gaming rig
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-4790K Asus Z97 Pro Wifi EVGA GTX970sc Crucial ballistic 16GB DDR3 1866 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Samsung 850 EVO 256GB SSD WD 1TB HDD Samsung DVDRW Corsair H60 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
W 10 Pro Samsung 23" Logitech g105 Corsair 750w 
Case
Corsair Carbide Spec-02 
  hide details  
Reply
post #8 of 72
Are those 2 with same pricing?
Skylake
(12 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 6700k Asus Maximus VIII Gene GTX 970 Kingston hyperx Savage  
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Samsung 850 PRO NH-D14 Win 7 Philips 60 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Ducky SHine 4 TX950 Air 540 G502 
  hide details  
Reply
Skylake
(12 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 6700k Asus Maximus VIII Gene GTX 970 Kingston hyperx Savage  
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Samsung 850 PRO NH-D14 Win 7 Philips 60 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Ducky SHine 4 TX950 Air 540 G502 
  hide details  
Reply
post #9 of 72
Am I hearing that right: only 1333Mhz DDR3 memory support, and that's it!?
With no way of pushing the bus clock to get that memory speed back, Sandy Bridge has completely lost my support. At least Bulldozer promises DDR3-1866.
post #10 of 72
So glad I sold my LGA 775 rig biggrin.gif

Now I'm just torn between the 2500k or the 2600k, but as I only game, I'll probably go with the 2500k.

That thing will last for ages biggrin.gif
Son of a Bridge
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 2600k @ 4.2ghz | 1.24v Asus P8P67 EVO [B3 Revision] Sapphire HD6870 1GB GDDR5 @ 1ghz Core 4GB Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600mhz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500gb 16MB Cache SATA II SATA LG DVD burner Windows 7 Ultimate x64 Acer LCD 17" 1280x1024 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Corsair TX650 Modded regular case X7 X-760H 2000 DPI N@NO 
  hide details  
Reply
Son of a Bridge
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 2600k @ 4.2ghz | 1.24v Asus P8P67 EVO [B3 Revision] Sapphire HD6870 1GB GDDR5 @ 1ghz Core 4GB Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600mhz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500gb 16MB Cache SATA II SATA LG DVD burner Windows 7 Ultimate x64 Acer LCD 17" 1280x1024 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Corsair TX650 Modded regular case X7 X-760H 2000 DPI N@NO 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Hardware News
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › [itocp] Benchmark for i7 2600 @ stock vs i7 875K @ 3.4GHz